linusrichard
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 2,710
Every time Obama decides to do something other than talk with a former SoS, that's another chance turned down. And we have plenty of evidence that Obama chooses to do all sorts of things besides talk with former SoSs.
Sometimes he plays golf. Sometimes he campaigns for office. Sometimes he gives press conferences or tries to broker budget deals. Sometimes he even attends PDBs. We have evidence of this. "Intellectually curious" or not, he doesn't spend all of every day with anybody and everybody who has an opinion about Israel-Palestine relations.
And neither does Romney.
You have no idea if Romney didn't want to delve into it because he was about to do his twice-monthly exercise. Or because he'd already heard and considered the SoS's prospect, or because he was already fully occupied that day and simply didn't have time for an ad-hoc mideast briefing at the time the call came in.
You don't know. You don't know, and you have no way of knowing. But even so, you're convinced that he made the wrong decision.
This would be quite a good response if all we know was that Romney had been approached with a prospect by a former SoS, and had blown her or him off. But we know more than that--we know that Romney considered this episode to be worth an anecdote.
And in that anecdote, he gives no reason why he blew the SoS off, leading a reasonable audience to conclude it was lack of interest. Either he is purposely omitting details in an attempt to make himself look worse, or he just wasn't interested.
It is reasonable to suppose that if he had a different or better reason, he would have shared it. And conversely, since he didn't share it, it is reasonable suppose he didn't have one.