• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Regarding Franko...

Originally posted by wraith
your MPB has already selected your choices...
Then it is not a "choice", is it?


MPB does not equal free-will...
Do you agree that your choices have already been selected?
I do not. If it is already selected, then there is no choice. For example. Choose one option from the following list.
  • Option one

2 + 2 does not choose to equal 4...
free-will believers say that it does...
Um... no they don't. Now some people adept at math have shown you that depending on how you define two, you can get various outcomes. However, I assume you are talking about integers (since I suspect you are not familiar with group theory) and I agree 2 + 2 = 4. But this has nothing to do with free will as I have defined it because there are no other options. Remember, free will chooses between available percieved options.

How? You spoke one sentence in french to mock me. That was the perceived benefit. However, you wouldnt type out this whole post in french if you wanted my opinion on something and I didnt understand french...
I did it to prove you wrong, not to mock you. The choice was mine.

actually, your MPB decides whether or not you learn another language...
why not learn mandarin now?
Too damn lazy. Mandarin would be of little use to me, although Spanish would be quite helpful. But I will probably use my free will to opt for being lazy.

In the same way that 2 + 2 chose to equal 4?
Not a choice. No options. See above.



coersion?
You saw that choice as being "beneficial" so you acted upon it...
if you knew that it was going to yield a certain outcome that you would have perceived as non-beneficial, then you wouldnt have "chosen" it.
Why do you think people always say "I wish I could go back in time and done this..."?
In everything you are explain here, you are making the the assumption that I choose. You have said it time and time again. Try it again. Choice means free will. If no free will, there is no choice.

Well, if double standards takes your fancy, then Pixy is kicking my arse.
;)
You have never demonstrated a double standard. You have tried to tell us what Misa thinks, then argued against that. However, most of us here have seen enough straw men to recognize one. You have demonstrated an inability to vary your arguments, an unwillingness to answer questions, and internal contradictions in your logic. Yes, PM is kicking your arse. Of course, you can use your "free will" to engage in self-delusion, but it is obvious to almost everyone else here.

Sorry, bad wording...
Im saying describing free-will is like describing a 4 sided tri...
oh, are you going to show me this 4 sided tri of yours?
haha.
As I have stated, I will show you the 4-sided triangle when you agree to admit free will exists once I have done so. If you do not agree to this in advance, I "perceive no benefit" in doing so, so I will excercise my free will not to show you.

free-will is not MPB
read above!
I agree, they are not exactly the same. Now I will show you the difference.

Tricky said:Think of a number between 1 and 100.
Wraith said:
done
;)
Okay. I don't care what number you chose, but you admit you chose one. I never promised you anything, and even if I had, what possible MPB could you have for choosing the number you did?. There is no benefit to one number over another. This illustrates the rare situation where MBP is different from free will. Usually, you use your free will to choose the most advantageous path. But sometimes, it is impossible to know what path is more advantageous. You have no idea what number I have chosen, and indeed, I didn't even choose one. No number could be perceived more beneficial than another one, and yet, you chose one. This is an example of free will without MPB.
 
Franko said:


Ahh, you could say that She was responsible in the same way that you could claim Bill Gates was responsible for every Window’s based computer-virus that was ever written.
Bill Gates doesn't have complete determisitic-style control over the computer industry (although he certainly would like to).

Does the LG/TLOP control EVERYTHING or doesn't she/it?

Upchurch
 
Bill Gates doesn't have complete determisitic-style control over the computer industry (although he certainly would like to).

Does the LG/TLOP control EVERYTHING or doesn't she/it?

1) Bill Gates is no Logical Goddess
2) You obviously don't know much about the PC industry. More than ANY other person Bill Gates has shaped it's current and future form.
 
Franko said:


1) Bill Gates is no Logical Goddess
2) You obviously don't know much about the PC industry. More than ANY other person Bill Gates has shaped it's current and future form.
Yeah, but he doesn't control how I use my computer or what I use it for. Plus, I can always buy a Mac or use Linix. REGARDLESS, that isn't the point. I was making a joke at Bill's expense (another thing he can't control)

My question is: Does your Logical Goddess control everything in a deterministic fashion so that no human (our made up killer, Hitler, etc.) has a choice but to follow the LG's commands?

Upchurch
 
Upchurch:
Yeah, but he doesn't control how I use my computer or what I use it for.

Sure he does!

Try and use a non-windows PC program on a window’s PC. Remove all of Bill Gate’s Microsoft products off your computer and see how useful it is to you.

Plus, I can always buy a Mac or use Linix.

Yeah, but then you can’t run any of the Microsoft products, and how good is a PC without any Microsoft products?

… REGARDLESS, that isn't the point. I was making a joke at Bill's expense (another thing he can't control)

hehehe … tell that to his goons (:mad: :mad: :mad: ) when they show up on your doorstep … hehehe …
 
Allow me to simplify:

Does your Logical Goddess control everything in a deterministic fashion so that no human (our made up killer, Hitler, etc.) has a choice but to follow the LG's commands?

Upchurch
 
Joshua Korosi said:
It's Linux, not "Linix"...evil A-Theist... :p
D@mn it! I almost spelled it that way, but changed my mind at the last minute. I don't use the stuff anyway and it's irrelevent to the topic at hand.

Upchurch
 
Upchurch said:

D@mn it! I almost spelled it that way, but changed my mind at the last minute. I don't use the stuff anyway and it's irrelevent to the topic at hand.

Upchurch

I know...but whether it is relevant or not is irrelevant.

Do continue, though.
 
Upchurch:
I don't use the stuff anyway and it's irrelevent to the topic at hand.

Ahhh -- so Bill Gates does control you and your computer use after all.

Make sure you tell the goons that! ( :mad: :mad: :mad: )
 
Allow me to help you focus:

Does your Logical Goddess control everything in a deterministic fashion so that no human (our made up killer, Hitler, etc.) has a choice but to follow the LG's commands?

Upchurch
 
Upchurch said:
Does your Logical Goddess control everything in a deterministic fashion so that no human (our made up killer, Hitler, etc.) has a choice but to follow the LG's commands?
Nevermind. Unless you post, "No, Upchurch. My Logical Goddess doesn't control everything in a deterministic fashion", I'm going to assume that you believe that she does, since this is in keeping with your posts in the past.

Therefore, if we take that your system of beliefs are correct, then the LG is responsible for all the good and evil that happens in the world. As such, I have to wonder what is her basis for judging humans (her unwitting tools) and rewarding or punishing them?

It would seem that it is the LG herself who has earned the reward and/or punishment through her responsibility. Our imaginary killer should no more be punished for killing the victim than the gun or bullet should be punished.

Upchurch
 
Upchurch said:

Nevermind. Unless you post, "No, Upchurch. My Logical Goddess doesn't control everything in a deterministic fashion", I'm going to assume that you believe that she does, since this is in keeping with your posts in the past.

Upchurch,

I don´t think Franko has any problem to recognise that the LG is responsible for everything in the Universe. In fact, the example of Hitler`s killers just reinforces his beliefs.

However, wraith said otherwise, that´s why I asked him about it. Wraith is not a Fatalist in this regard.

Upchurch said:

Therefore, if we take that your system of beliefs are correct, then the LG is responsible for all the good and evil that happens in the world. As such, I have to wonder what is her basis for judging humans (her unwitting tools) and rewarding or punishing them?


I have the same question. In a deterministic Universe, punishment and rewards are contradictory.
 
Upchurch:

Does your Logical Goddess control everything in a deterministic fashion so that no human (our made up killer, Hitler, etc.) has a choice but to follow the LG's commands?

Atoms obey the Laws of Physics (TLOP).
You are made of Atoms.
You obey the laws of Physics.

Unless you have some evidence to the contrary … ?

But that doesn’t mean that the LG commanded Hitler to kill anyone. That was ALL Hitler!

Q-Source:
I have the same question. In a deterministic Universe, punishment and rewards are contradictory.

Yeah, it is contradictory in the EXACT same way that a round moving Earth is contradictory.

I mean – come on! The Earth is orbiting the Sun at 65,000 mph!?!?!?! If that is true then how come when I just walked outside a minute ago the wind wasn’t even blowing???

… and if the Earth is Really round … then how come all of the people don’t fall off of the Southern hemisphere?

Or are you claiming that Africa, South America, and Australia are all uninhabited?
 
Franko said:
But that doesn’t mean that the LG commanded Hitler to kill anyone. That was ALL Hitler!
Wait. So if Hitler wasn't being controled by the LG when he killed all those people and he wasn't being controlled by anyone else ("ALL Hitler!"), then Hitler chose to kill those people? Does that mean Hitler had free will? If not, how could have he decided to kill anyone?

Upchurch

edited to add:
Further, how do you find it possible for Hitler to do anything that the LG didn't want him to do? What allowed him to "defy the laws of physics" like that?
 
Franko said:

Yeah, it is contradictory in the EXACT same way that a round moving Earth is contradictory.

Who so?

The LG predetermines my actions, behaviour, decisions and whatever, I am just her puppet.

Are you claiming that a puppet has free will ? :mad:

Q-S
 
Upchurch:
Wait. So if Hitler wasn't being controlled by the LG when he killed all those people and he wasn't being controlled by anyone else ("ALL Hitler!"), then Hitler chose to kill those people? Does that mean Hitler had free will? If not, how could have he decided to kill anyone?

Hitler was compelled to do what Hitler did by his own intrinsic nature.

Like I said, You can’t blame Bill Gates for every windows based computer virus that was ever written just because Gates is responsible for creating windows.

Never-the-less, every programmer who ever wrote a windows based computer virus was controlled in that endeavor by Bill Gates.

Q-Source:
Who so?

The LG predetermines my actions, behaviour, decisions and whatever, I am just her puppet.

Are you claiming that a puppet has free will ?

How are You Her puppet Source?

I thought You were an A-Theist? You don’t even believe She exist.

But I’m Her puppet, and I don’t have any “free will”. When She pulls my trigger, I fire with both barrels with a better than 100% reliability rate (and improved accuracy).
 
Franko said:
Hitler was compelled to do what Hitler did by his own intrinsic nature.
heh. That's what Latimer said you would say. Specifically, he told me:
Originally PMed by Latimer
So, he may arguie that Hitler was a graviton snatched by the LG and put into this universe for testing purposes; and that he turned out to be a bad graviton was because it was his 'intrinsic nature,' which the LG does not control. I think that's what he will say, anyway.
It's interesting that you believe that there is a part of humans that is not controlled by the Logical Goddess, by the laws of physics. A part of us that acts according to our own selves (our natures) and is not controled by any outside agency. A part that even the Logical Goddess doesn't know what we will do (for if she did, she's just as responsible for Hitler's acts as she would be setting fire to an explosive's fuse).

I can finally define "free will" within your own context, Franko.

"Acting according to one's free will" is the same thing as "acting according to one's intrinsic nature". It's the same thing that absolves your LG of responsibility of the actions of us humans. It's the same thing that allows her to justly judge us for reward and punishment.

your "intrinsic nature" = everyone else's "free will"

Upchurch
 
Upchurch:

your "intrinsic nature" = everyone else's "free will"

If you insist. :confused:

I guess it is kind of like how My round Earth is you and all the rest of the A-Theist's flat Earth ???

... or is it more like:

your "The Laws of Physics" = everyone else's "God"?

... or is it more like:

your "not a religion" = everyone else's "THAT'S A RELIGION!!!"


Upchurch don't you think that maybe it is time to stop calling the round earth a flat one for the sake of your religious beliefs, and just concede to Agnosticism?
 

Back
Top Bottom