• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Regarding Franko...

Franko:
Why should I believe your "superior" metaphsical belief system based on absolutely no evidence?

MRC:
Why, you shouldnt. First of all, my belief system is not metaphysical, secondly, one of the few dogmas of my belief system is that nobody should believe in anything without evidence.

So what if your evidence for believing you have “free will”? And if you do not have any evidence for “free will”, then how can you claim that there is no evidence for “God”?

Franko:
What about Fatalism and Determinism. They seem like direct evidence for God to me? How do you refute this? Why do you believe that there is more evidence for "free will" then there is for "God"? If you honestly believe this then why have you repeatedly refused to provide a side by side comparsion of the evidence?

MRC: (Bug in the code)
I quite agree, Fatalism and Determinism don't make sense at all without a god. However, Fatalism and Determinism have some difficulties in the face of empirical evidence (you have still ignored my challenge to explain a simple phenomenon like phosphorescense in a deterministic way).

Actually I did explain it. But why are you trying to shift the burden onto me? If you are claiming that phosphorescence is evidence of Indeterminism, then please explain what you mean? Why am I required to read your mind?

Just for the record though … are you seriously contending that phosphorescence is not controlled/governed by the Laws of Physics? Once AGAIN you are confusing Determinism with OMNISCIENCE! Why don’t you go and check one of your inerrant Dictionaries for the well documented Differences in the meaning of those two terms!

Franko:
I don't see any evidence that YOU have "free will'. I don't see ANY evidence that Indeterminism is True. I don't see any evidence that there is a "YOU" to even make decisions, "YOU" are nothing but a physical brain made up of atoms (chemicals) and obeying the natural laws of chemistry (TLOP).

MRC:
If you dont see an evidence of a "ME" why do you keep trying to communicate with me? If you dont believe I can make decisions, why do you keep telling me what I should do?

Actually I ask you a lot of questions about what You think, and why you think it. Probably exactly what you would have programmed me to do if you got stuck in this algorithm for too long.

Franko:
Besides if your decisons are not made algorithmically (deterministically, like a computer), then how exactly are they being made? That makes no sense what-so-ever, and you have repeatedly refused to address this point? Why are you so embarassed to posts your beliefs?!?!

MRC:
I dont know, Frank. All I know is that observations show that the world is not Deterministic.

Congratulations MRC, You manage to contradict yourself in only Two sentences. If you “don’t know”, then you “DON’T KNOW” that the world is NOT Deterministic.

Besides, ALL of the evidence shows that the world is clearly Deterministic.

You explain it too me MRC. Explain the traffic light. How does it work in your universe. You approach the red traffic light. You clearly perceive and recognize that it is red.

Now, I say that based on your previous experiences you quickly extrapolate:

1) STOP = Good
2) GO = Bad

But you seem to be saying that even in situations when You clearly perceive and recognize that the traffic light is red, that occasionally you will not base your decision on the past, and “randomly” run the red light because of the magic of Quantum mechanics?

MRC, you are looking more and more like a dancing monkey.

Franko:
MRC, why would the Universe make us, and then force us to watch a show? It is not like we can actually change anything that is going to happen, because it is all cause and event as decreed by TLOP and the Initial State.

MRC:
Thats your cosmology, not mine. Do try not to mix our beliefs up, it makes you seem insincere.

Okay, so the only difference I see in our cosmologies at this level of detail is that I believe the “giant sky program” is completely deterministic based on a fixed initial dataset, whereas you believe that some of the variables in the program are randomly generated.

You know a little programming MRC – don’t you? Are you telling me that it is impossible to write a computer program with random variables? That would give you your magic “Indeterminancy” … unfortunately for you it would still make you an Algorithm, and there would still be a bigger more conscious Algorithm controlling You.

Franko:
What’s the YOU making the decisions Han-job?

MRC:
I dont know.

Well how can you claim to have “free will” then? The atoms in your physical brain obey TLOP exactly the same as the atoms in the ham sandwich you ate for lunch. Ergo your brain has just as much “free will” as a (toasted) ham sandwich.

Franko:
You never could explain that? Aren't YOU just atoms obeying TLOP?

MRC:
I dont know.

Yet Christians and Theists everywhere are idiots for thinking similarly?

Franko:
How can TLOP control your brain and be less conscious then YOU?

MRC:
The same way as a wall can control me and be less conscious than me.

What makes you think that wall would even exist if the Dungeonmaster hadn’t told you where it was? Besides TLOP controls you regardless of the presence of Walls.

Franko:
How can TLOP control your brain and be less conscious then YOU?

MRC:
The same way as the rules of baseball can control the players and be less conscious than them.

Ohhh, so now you are claiming that the “rules of baseball” magically appeared out of the void JUST LIKE TLOP? Because I always thought that “the rules of baseball” were created by a CONSCIOUSNESS!?!? I thought you were going to give us an example of a non-conscious creation controlling you?

Were you ever emotionally moved by a film, or a book? You do realize that when a book, or film communicates an idea (a meme) to you, it is really just communicating by proxy for the original consciousness who transmitted the meme. Take this post for example … it’s not me talking to you directly … it’s TLOP relaying to you what I have transmitted.

Franko:
I guess the same way that YOU control CAR while being less conscious then CAR? Or is it more like your BRAIN controls your LEGs, ergo LEGS are more conscious then your BRAIN (for you that's prabably True).

MRC:
I think not.

I don’t know MRC … I think your legs put up a much stronger argument.
 
Franko said:
Well explain how computer languages work then? I notice you tend to skip questions in my posts when they point out the obvious flaws in your arguments. Face it MRC, you are a brainwashed A-Theist desperately trying to cling to your absurd dogmatic magical beliefs. You have NO evidence for “free will”, and without “free will” your no god claim has more holes than Swiss cheese. You A-Theists all think you are so smart, but the fact is you are the biggest bunch of religious idiots to ever walk the Earth. You all going down …

phark yeah!
 
to Franko:

from Franko:
You know a little programming MRC – don’t you? Are you telling me that it is impossible to write a computer program with random variables? That would give you your magic “Indeterminancy” … unfortunately for you it would still make you an Algorithm, and there would still be a bigger more conscious Algorithm controlling You.

Hah! So it IS God's fault when someone goes to hell!
He actually does choose who goes! The SOB! I knew it!
 
Re: to Franko:

the_ignored said:
from Franko:


Hah! So it IS God's fault when someone goes to hell!
He actually does choose who goes! The SOB! I knew it!

What makes you so sure that you were created by God?
 
(Another A-Theist)
Hah! So it IS God's fault when someone goes to hell!
He actually does choose who goes! The SOB! I knew it!

God’s fault? Why is it that You A-Theists are always sooo eager to have someone else be responsible for your bad karma? If you can’t believe you have magic “free willy” powers that alleviate you from consequences you quickly have to find a way to blame God for your bad behavior.

Here’s a suggestion for you: Why don’t you just start behaving as if there might be consequences for your actions? Wouldn’t that be the better play for everyone concerned? Besides, since there is no possible way you are certain that there is no God, you might actually exist a little longer if you modify your behavior thusly. At very least you will be spared from casting yourself as a dishonest, hypocritical religious fanatic.

Ohh, and you should listen to the Wraith … God didn’t make you.
 
to Franko:

God’s fault? Why is it that You A-Theists are always sooo eager to have someone else be responsible for your bad karma? If you can’t believe you have magic “free willy” powers that alleviate you from consequences you quickly have to find a way to blame God for your bad behavior.
If you don't believe we have "free will" but are rather just puppets of some higher being, then how in hell could it be our fault, eh? We're just puppets, he's pulling the strings.

Guess what? We atheists don't believe in god. We do believe in free will, and we do believe in consequences for our actions. We just believe the consequences are in this world, for us and those that come after us. Since we know that there is no god, we also know that when we do something bad, we have no choice but to take the responsibility for the actions ourselves. So, therefore, your statement about athests always wanting to find a way to blame someone else for what we do is pure ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊. Not even many christian apologetics sites are that ignorant.

I am just trying to show you the holes in your own premise. You argue against free will, yet you still assign blame to us, when we're just doing what god makes us do.

Here’s a suggestion for you: Why don’t you just start behaving as if there might be consequences for your actions? Wouldn’t that be the better play for everyone concerned? Besides, since there is no possible way you are certain that there is no God, you might actually exist a little longer if you modify your behavior thusly. At very least you will be spared from casting yourself as a dishonest, hypocritical religious fanatic.
Guess what, that's what atheists do generally already. (go to "Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers Website") for example.

No problem. As for casting anyone as "dishonest, hypocritical religious fanatics", since atheism is not a religion, I'll leave that kind of behavour up to christians like you who show again and again that you don't know what you're talking about.
 
Re: to Franko:

the_ignored said:
We atheists don't believe in god. We do believe in free will, and we do believe in consequences for our actions.

Can you do anything you want to? Can you jump from a 50 story building, get up and wipe the dust off and then go have a beer? No, you are restricted by TLOP. You do not have free will and never will.

It always interests me how A-Theists do think they have free will. Always remember that you as an individual operate in a very chaotic system with rules. Since there are rules, you have no free will.

JK
 
Can you do anything you want to? Can you jump from a 50 story building, get up and wipe the dust off and then go have a beer? No, you are restricted by TLOP. You do not have free will and never will.

It always interests me how A-Theists do think they have free will. Always remember that you as an individual operate in a very chaotic system with rules. Since there are rules, you have no free will.
Free will does not mean that we can do anything and everything. There is free will, it's just not absolute. If you can't tell the difference between having some free will and not having any free will then this conversation is useless because we'll be talking about two different things.

While we won't survice that fall, we can decide to: either take the elevator down or walk back down the stairs. How do the laws of physics take away our "free will" there?

More examples:
(ie. What career do I take, what person do I decide to be friends with, who do I marry? Should I marry, should we have kids, etc) Again, what do the laws of physics have to do with that?


While the laws of physics are useful in helping us make some decisions, ie. whether to jump off or not, (why the hell would I want to anyway?!) We can still make an adundance of choices on our own. Just see the examples above.

Also, is there some hidden meaning or insult that we're to take from the spelling of A-Theist? Do the laws of physics compell you to spell "atheist" as "A-Theist"? Or is it something you've decided to do to try and honk somebody off?

If you don't believe in free will at all, then try answering these:
1) How do the laws of physics compel you to sign up here and debate?

2)How do the laws of physics compell you to take Ian McDiarmid's character's picture as an avatar?
 
Damn. Speaking of RESET. :(

Come on, somebody fess up it's a sock puppet. Or are we going to do it all over again from scratch? :D
 
I keep saying that reality is a lot more like Groundhog Day then people think, but the A-Theists just don't seem to perceive it.
 
Can you jump from a 50 story building, get up and wipe the dust off and then go have a beer?

Can you identify anyone who has made this claim? Show me their quotes.

No, you are restricted by TLOP.

No, TLOP simply describe the nature of the universe.

You do not have free will and never will.

If the only thing that you will accept as evidence of free will is activity outside that which is described by TLOP, then you are merely argueing with a strawman. If someone has made the claim that they have free will because they can act outside TLOP, please show me their quotes. You get extra points if you can provide quotes which demonstrate that you must also be an atheist in order to hold this belief.

It always interests me how A-Theists do think they have free will. Always remember that you as an individual operate in a very chaotic system with rules. Since there are rules, you have no free will.

Have you ever played Monopoly? If you have the rules handy, pull them out. You will see that they describe the entire monopoly universe:

TROM = The Rules Of Monopoly

Players obey TROM.
You are a Player.
You obey TROM.

TROM makes/controls YOU makes/controls CAR (or tophat, or thimble, iron, whatever)

I am sure that you find no flaws in the TROM arguement.

So with TROM in hand, which are much more simplistic than TLOP, please let me know how I will fare in the next ten games of monopoly that I play with three other players. Please let me know what place I will finish, and which square on the board I will occupy at the end of each game. If you are unable to do this with the monopoly rulebook (TROM) in hand, please explain what additional information is required.

I don't think the heretical practice of winning money for landing on free parking need be discussed.
 
Max560 said:
Can you jump from a 50 story building, get up and wipe the dust off and then go have a beer?

Can you identify anyone who has made this claim? Show me their quotes.

No, you are restricted by TLOP.

No, TLOP simply describe the nature of the universe.

You do not have free will and never will.

If the only thing that you will accept as evidence of free will is activity outside that which is described by TLOP, then you are merely argueing with a strawman. If someone has made the claim that they have free will because they can act outside TLOP, please show me their quotes. You get extra points if you can provide quotes which demonstrate that you must also be an atheist in order to hold this belief.

It always interests me how A-Theists do think they have free will. Always remember that you as an individual operate in a very chaotic system with rules. Since there are rules, you have no free will.

Have you ever played Monopoly? If you have the rules handy, pull them out. You will see that they describe the entire monopoly universe:

TROM = The Rules Of Monopoly

Players obey TROM.
You are a Player.
You obey TROM.

TROM makes/controls YOU makes/controls CAR (or tophat, or thimble, iron, whatever)

I am sure that you find no flaws in the TROM arguement.

So with TROM in hand, which are much more simplistic than TLOP, please let me know how I will fare in the next ten games of monopoly that I play with three other players. Please let me know what place I will finish, and which square on the board I will occupy at the end of each game. If you are unable to do this with the monopoly rulebook (TROM) in hand, please explain what additional information is required.

I don't think the heretical practice of winning money for landing on free parking need be discussed.

You don't get it and it is so simple. If there are rules, which there are, you have no free will. Philosophy 099.

JK
 
Franko said:


hehehe ... imagine me banging my fist on the pulpit while I shout it, does that make it look/sound better? ... hehe ... :cool:

NOW THAT would echo power!
 
Re: to Franko:

the_ignored said:
If you don't believe we have "free will" but are rather just puppets of some higher being, then how in hell could it be our fault, eh? We're just puppets, he's pulling the strings.

Yes, but that doesnt imply that we're not responsible for our actions

Guess what? We atheists don't believe in god. We do believe in free will, and we do believe in consequences for our actions. We just believe the consequences are in this world, for us and those that come after us..

youre "free-will" is your Free-Willy God....you dont what to know life without Him ;)

How do you believe that you have consequences for your actions?
Whats to stop you from stealing a million bucks if know one is watching?

Since we know that there is no god,

The fatal flaw... :eek:

we also know that when we do something bad, we have no choice but to take the responsibility for the actions ourselves. So, therefore, your statement about athests always wanting to find a way to blame someone else for what we do is pure ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊

Perhaps you should understand Fate first?

I am just trying to show you the holes in your own premise. You argue against free will, yet you still assign blame to us, when we're just doing what god makes us do.

Again, you dont understand Fate...
Do your desires/emotions warp from the void aswell?

No problem. As for casting anyone as "dishonest, hypocritical religious fanatics", since atheism is not a religion, I'll leave that kind of behavour up to christians like you who show again and again that you don't know what you're talking about.

actually, atheism is a religion...you guys go around saying that TLOP is a non-conscious force, then demand that people should take on board what youre saying as being "true" without ANY evidence/logic

sounds like the words of a religious fanatic to me
 
If the only thing that you will accept as evidence of free will is activity outside that which is described by TLOP, then you are merely argueing with a strawman. If someone has made the claim that they have free will because they can act outside TLOP, please show me their quotes. You get extra points if you can provide quotes which demonstrate that you must also be an atheist in order to hold this belief.

Why don’t you start by defining “free will”. I bet you cannot do it without a logical contradiction in the process. If you were a real Skeptic you would have bothered to take the time and consider this before embarrassing yourself here.

How exactly is arguing against “free will” a “strawman”? I notice that every time someone is Skeptical of the religion of A-Theism some A-Theists starts screaming “Strawman”!

Seriously, you nitwits are like Pavlov’s Dog’s on that. If you cannot precisely define what the specific “strawman” is then all you are doing is making yourself look like a religious nitwit with nothing to back up his absurd dogma. Either explain the “strawman”, or shut the f*ck up.

If you are obeying TLOP then your claim that there is no “god” looks as ridiculous as Willy Nelson at a “Just Say No Rally”.

TLOP (God) controls YOU controls CAR

Unless you want to claim that your CAR has more “free will” than YOU do?
 
Max560 said:
Jedi says: No, you are restricted by TLOP.

Max: No, TLOP simply describe the nature of the universe.

TLOP describes the moon, yet the moon has the ability to disobey TLOP?

If the only thing that you will accept as evidence of free will is activity outside that which is described by TLOP, then you are merely argueing with a strawman. If someone has made the claim that they have free will because they can act outside TLOP, please show me their quotes. You get extra points if you can provide quotes which demonstrate that you must also be an atheist in order to hold this belief.

Anyone who argues for free-will is really saying that the present is not based on the past aka magic

Have you ever played Monopoly? If you have the rules handy, pull them out. You will see that they describe the entire monopoly universe:

TROM = The Rules Of Monopoly

Players obey TROM.
You are a Player.
You obey TROM.

TROM makes/controls YOU makes/controls CAR (or tophat, or thimble, iron, whatever)

I am sure that you find no flaws in the TROM arguement.

So with TROM in hand, which are much more simplistic than TLOP, please let me know how I will fare in the next ten games of monopoly that I play with three other players. Please let me know what place I will finish, and which square on the board I will occupy at the end of each game. If you are unable to do this with the monopoly rulebook (TROM) in hand, please explain what additional information is required.

I don't think the heretical practice of winning money for landing on free parking need be discussed.

In other words, youre saying that TROM should also take control of TLOP?

The roll of the dice for example, should obey TROM.

YOU obey TLOP obeys TROM...

I dont think so Max ;)
 
Jedi Knight said:


You don't get it and it is so simple. If there are rules, which there are, you have no free will. Philosophy 099.

JK

No, you don't get it. We do have free will, since you can't use the rules to demonstrate with absolute certainty all outcomes.

I asked some specific questions in that post. Can we safely assume that you lack the courage to answer them?
 
Max560 said:


No, you don't get it. We do have free will, since you can't use the rules to demonstrate with absolute certainty all outcomes.

I asked some specific questions in that post. Can we safely assume that you lack the courage to answer them?

Did the folks who were roasted alive inside the nightclub in Rhode Island recently (all 96 of them) have free will? I think they were willing themselves a way out of there, but TLOP nailed them.

All outcomes are absolute beyond the scope of human interference. There is no free will.

JK
 
Franko said:


Why don’t you start by defining “free will”. I bet you cannot do it without a logical contradiction in the process. If you were a real Skeptic you would have bothered to take the time and consider this before embarrassing yourself here.

How exactly is arguing against “free will” a “strawman”? I notice that every time someone is Skeptical of the religion of A-Theism some A-Theists starts screaming “Strawman”!

Seriously, you nitwits are like Pavlov’s Dog’s on that. If you cannot precisely define what the specific “strawman” is then all you are doing is making yourself look like a religious nitwit with nothing to back up his absurd dogma. Either explain the “strawman”, or shut the f*ck up.

If you are obeying TLOP then your claim that there is no “god” looks as ridiculous as Willy Nelson at a “Just Say No Rally”.

TLOP (God) controls YOU controls CAR

Unless you want to claim that your CAR has more “free will” than YOU do?

So I take it that you can't answer any questions in my quote either.

The way you abuse semantics to get your point across is astounding. You want everyone to ascribe to your strawman definition of Free Will so that you can ridicule it. Your strawman definition seems to be "the ability to break TLOP" or some elaboration on that theme. This is why you whip out Your TLOP arguement repeatedly.

I reject your TLOP controls YOU controls CAR statement because TLOP are descriptions of how the universe works, and not an entity with agency.

You would argue with a statistician that there is no such thing as magical "degrees of freedom": How can the number six choose? Does the number 5.7 have more freedom than 3.2? Etc.

In any case where I have 2 or more alternatives to choose from, and only I can predict which I will choose, thats Free Will in action. I don't care what factors come into play when making the decision- as long as I get the final word, thats free will.
 

Back
Top Bottom