• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Race-Based Grading

Thermal said:
Meeeeeeh...I dunno. Passing a class is more than memorizing facts and figures. There is an element of functioning in a society, too. Would you want to hire a straight-A student who doesn't show up for work or do what they are told, even if they understand the job? Would a college want to accept a student who is not prepared for the most basic requirements of lab work?

I mean, a public education is more than just the three Rs, isn't it?
Click to expand...

I've employed hundreds of people over my years, never once did I think an "A" grade or a "1" etc. in a subject told me anything about their attendance or their behaviour and so on as a kid at school or even college and university, it told me about a sliver of their academic capability. If the USA is using academic grades as a proxy for attendance and behaviour that seems very strange to me as I can't see any way a prospective employer can "decode" what that grade meant. Are they thick but turned up for every lesson, are they intelligent but only turned up for half the lessons, are they average but disruptive in class? How do you work it out?
 
Brainster said:
To repeat, I did not know the source was anything other than a small-town newspaper, which is why I didn't look into the source further. I did link to some of the material presented which at least backs up the main claims--that they are trying to reduce or eliminate grading based on attendance or submission of assignments, and that this is being done in the name of "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion." That this is code for "based on race" is the assumption of the writer, yes, but is it an unreasonable assumption?
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
So, the "story" appealed to your opinions/prejudices and you swallowed it, hook, line and sinker, before regurgitating it here, spreading the lie as it's creators intended.
Maybe you should re-think your trust of sources that supposedly support your opinions?
 
Anatomy of a fake
What a viral fake news story about "race-based grading" tells us about our media ecosystem

...

Awash in pink slime
Local Government Information Services is the publisher of lots of local news media in Illinois, with titles like “Southern Illinois News” and “SW Illinois news.” LGIS is part much larger network of local news in multiple states. As local news media has disappeared “pink slime” outlets like LGIS have taken their place, relying on low-cost or automated content repeated across sites, and eschewing basic journalistic practices.

Just how big and how connected these local news outlets is difficult to discern. In 2020, the New York Times counted about 1,200 connected local news outlets that had arisen in just 10 years.
Click to expand...

https://donmoynihan.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-fake?s=w

An exploration of how these fake newspapers operate and the gullible rubes that credulously believe and spread their stories.
 
theprestige said:
Ad homs are a fallacy, and thus a bad reason to reject a claim.
Click to expand...

I think, though, that source credibility is an ok starting point for some cases.

If you hear a sensationalist headline, it might be difficult or time consuming to check out the truth of the headline, but if it comes from a source that is constantly giving sensationalist headlines that aren't true, then it makes sense to just dismiss it without further investigation.

In this case, I did some further investigation and verified it was hogwash, but I couldn't fault people who decided not to do that investigation simply based on the rather incredible claim from a source that has no credibility.
 
Oh, for ****'s sake:

Statement regarding grading practices

https://www.oprfhs.org/news/1742090/statement-regarding-grading-practices

In full:
Posted May 31, 2022

It has come to the District’s attention that a recent article in the online West Cook News inaccurately states that at the Board of Education’s May 26 meeting, Oak Park and River Forest High School announced that it will implement a race-based grading system in the 2022-2023 school year. This is not true.

OPRFHS does not, nor has it ever had a plan to, grade any students differently based on race. The article contains a variety of misleading and inaccurate statements. The article’s mischaracterization of the Board meeting is unfortunate and has caused unnecessary confusion.

As part of the Board of Education’s strategic plan, the OPRFHS Grading and Assessment Committee was formed to examine national research on objective, unbiased practices for determining whether students have mastered academic content. At the Board of Education’s May 26 meeting, the administration’s representative to the OPRFHS Grading and Assessment Committee provided an initial report that included a progress update on the committee’s examination of grading practices.

At no time were any statements made recommending that OPRF implement a race-based grading approach.

Prior to implementing grading changes, if any, recommendations will be made to the Board at a public meeting. Again, contrary to the title of the article, the district has not implemented, and has no intention of implementing, any grading and assessment policy based on race.

As the OPRFHS Grading and Assessment Committee continues its work, the district is committed to keeping the community updated to any changes. We encourage the community to seek information directly from the district or other reliable news sources rather than internet sources that continue to share inaccurate information.
Click to expand...

I have no other comment I would be permitted to make in this forum.

:jaw-dropp
 
Meadmaker said:
I think, though, that source credibility is an ok starting point for some cases.

If you hear a sensationalist headline, it might be difficult or time consuming to check out the truth of the headline, but if it comes from a source that is constantly giving sensationalist headlines that aren't true, then it makes sense to just dismiss it without further investigation.

In this case, I did some further investigation and verified it was hogwash, but I couldn't fault people who decided not to do that investigation simply based on the rather incredible claim from a source that has no credibility.
Click to expand...

Sure. It's a heuristic I use all the time. The important thing is, I don't argue that other people should reject it based on my application of an ad hom.
 
Shepherd said:
Here's the school's response to the article:

"Statement regarding grading practices | Oak Park and River Forest High School"

Posted May 31, 2022"

https://www.oprfhs.org/news/1742090/statement-regarding-grading-practices
Click to expand...
Given how often that particular "news site" has lied about the school they probably have a template.

EaglePuncher said:
So one could say that the OP was.........content free?
Click to expand...
Truth free. It had lots of lies and dogwhistle terms to attract the dumber more gullible 'conservative'.
 
Brainster said:
Well, I would hope that some people have said the highlighted. The other part is the one the education establishment can control, and there are some indications it is going on--the elimination of AP courses and magnet schools are just one indicator.

That said, I admit the headline is inflammatory and I should not have used it for the OP title, or at least added a question mark. My bad definitely there.
Click to expand...

Well, at least your humble enough to know when you are clearly wrong about something.

So thanks much for that.

Also, I hope that in the future if you see one such inflammatory article, then you will take the effort to do a bit of basic research in order to determine if said article is actually legitimate or not.

After all, there is great deal of fake stuff in the world: coins, antiques, identification cards, news items and so on, therefore one needs to be wary.
 
Darat said:
What a waste of time for the school to have to keep dealing with this type of crap, one wonders if there is a need to have more cases like the Sandy Hook parents suing Jones so that people stop lying.
Click to expand...
It;s the third or fourth such task for them.

Meadmaker said:
I think, though, that source credibility is an ok starting point for some cases.
Click to expand...
It is. Some people just love to engage in contrarian trolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom