Questions for Jesus-Freak

jesus_freak said:
Like webster I guess...Why?
1.a domesticated canid, Canis familiaris, bred in many varieties. 2.any carnivore of the dogfamily Canidae, having prominent canine teeth and, in the wild state, a long and slender muzzle, a deep-chested muscular body, a bushy tail, and large, erect ears
Click to expand...

so, if a breed of dog was breed to loose those attributes, ie the canine teeth etc and it became hairless and had hooves and horns, would it still be of the 'dog' family?
 
So only Christians can be good people?
Click to expand...
Wow do you even read what I write or do you just make these things up...Don't make me ignore your post like I already do cyborgs.
2)Atheist, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddist...none can be good people...
Click to expand...
 
Yes DangerousBeliefs, don't make JF ignore you.

Seriously, you're 29? You're acting like a child.
 
jesus_freak said:
If a judge on earth sentences a criminal to prison does that not make him a merciful loving man/woman? No it makes him just
Click to expand...
Perhaps you missed the word "eternal" in the question.

and God is waaaaaay more just than any man.
Click to expand...
Wait, is God merciful, or is God just? They are contradictory terms.
 
Completely different question: Do you believe the earth orbits the sun, or vice versa? The standard biblical argument is Joshua, Chapter 10 "The sun stood still" quote, implying the sun is doing the moving.
 
Last edited:
merciful means forgiving and loving.
just means fair. Exactly. Like I said, they are contradictory.
Click to expand...
If you say so.
I have no problem answering questions anyone has for me... Can we however use this as a learning thread of how others feel or what they beleive. I am very courious to see how many of you feel about some topics and I do not try to change your mind or imply that you are stupid for thinking that. I am just here representing what I beleive and what I think and if you dont like my answers well just ignore them or dont ask any questions...k thanks!
 
jesus_freak said:
If you say so.
Click to expand...
So you agree?

ETA: It's not me that's not liking your answers; apparently, you are starting to realize the contradictions contained in your answers and therefore not liking your answers yourself. Which is excellent, and the only way progress is made.
 
Last edited:
Completely different question: Do you believe the earth orbits the sun,or vice versa? The standard biblical argument is Joshua, Chapter 10 "The sun stood still" quote, implying the sun is doing the moving.
Click to expand...
I do beleive the earth orbits the sun...I don't know for sure but maybe this miracle refers to the sun moving in the same way as the earth. I know that there are many different views of this one and all I know is that God can do anything.
 
So you agree?

ETA: It's not me that's not liking your answers; apparently, you are starting to realize the contradictions contained in your answers and therefore not liking your answers yourself. Which is excellent, and the only way progress is made.
Click to expand...
How can I answer this one?...hmmmmm.....I guess with just a no.
 
jesus_freak said:
I don't.
Click to expand...



uh yeah you do. You said you do. You said you know very little, and still have a strong opinion. Thats ignorance. There is no harm in reading both sides of an issue and THEN deciding instead of just picking whatever you feel is right.
 
jesus_freak said:
I do beleive the earth orbits the sun...I don't know for sure but maybe this miracle refers to the sun moving in the same way as the earth. I know that there are many different views of this one and all I know is that God can do anything.
Click to expand...

The point of my question and your answer was to demonstrate that religion can concede certain aspects of the natural world to science without losing its coherence. By stating that the earth orbits the sun, you are following current church doctrine, which is directly opposite of early church doctrine. Will you agree that the church can change its stance in the face of evidence when required?
 
I believe that the Second Law of Thermodynamics went into effect at the time of the Fall and was probably not a feature of the original creation. (This did not mean energy did not previously flow from hot to cold reservoirs--the Second Law is only about the increasing unavailability of energy to do useful work as time moves forward). The present tendency of the universe to decay and deteriorate (as described in Romans 8) is a result of human evil and/or evil amongst the angels. Likewise it has been suggested there was no radioactivity before the Fall, but that the radioactive decay of certain heavy atoms was switched on at the time of the Fall.

We do not observe God at work in the everyday world of nature because He almost always works within the framework of His own Laws. And also, "His ways are beyond our discovery,"

This might be why radio carbon dating is not accurate.

http://www.ldolphin.org/creationphysics.html
 
Wait... so heavy atoms decay as a result of man's evil?

That's not even wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom