Here's a place to continue the questions that were brought up in the Jesus-Freak Challenge topic and others if that seems convenient.
Jesus-Freak, in particular I would like to challenge you to answer my question that I posted in the Bible is 100% true topic. Can you as a Bible-believing Christian accept the scientific evidence for evolution as being reasonable and apparently true, and assume that God made it to appear that way for His own reasons? If not, why not? This is what I would ask your radio show people if I were to call in.
Second, I would like to ask you if you could talk about about microevolution, the change between what creationists call 'kinds' versus macroevolution, which creationists call the change between animals which are not 'kinds'? Can you talk about this without moving to abiogenisis?
Jesus-Freak, in particular I would like to challenge you to answer my question that I posted in the Bible is 100% true topic. Can you as a Bible-believing Christian accept the scientific evidence for evolution as being reasonable and apparently true, and assume that God made it to appear that way for His own reasons? If not, why not? This is what I would ask your radio show people if I were to call in.
Second, I would like to ask you if you could talk about about microevolution, the change between what creationists call 'kinds' versus macroevolution, which creationists call the change between animals which are not 'kinds'? Can you talk about this without moving to abiogenisis?