For the millionth time, a combination of wishful thinking and coincidental recovery.Badly Shaved Monkey said:[HandInAir]Ooh...Ooh...I know..I know...
[/GivesUpAndLetsSomeoneElseAnswer]
Carbohydrate metabolism is much more efficient than fat metabolism assuming adequate oxygen is available (ie aerobic metabolism). But once VO2max has been reached, and anaerobic metabolism takes over, the efficiency of carbohydrate metabolism drops off dramatically. Carbohydrate will produce 19 times as many units of ATP per gram when metabolized in the presence of adequate cell oxygen supplies (aerobic) as opposed to its metabolism in an oxygen deficient (anaerobic) environment.http://www.cptips.com/bscphys.htm
Kumar said:Are these the replies of my question?
Lots of people in this forum have told you things, Kumar. Why do you ignore them, and refuse to listen to them, but then keep coming back here wittering about what other people have told you?Kumar said:Someone told that ....
Rolfe said:Lots of people in this forum have told you things, Kumar. Why do you ignore them, and refuse to listen to them, but then keep coming back here wittering about what other people have told you?
Rolfe.
Kumar said:Diabetes oral medicines(most) & insulin are sulphur based. Can these cause adverse allergic reactions (as sulpha durgs can do) lactic acidosis or acidosis conditions. Can these behave differantly in sulpha senstive persons or in persons who tends to get lactic acid excesses by taking metformin?
A number of non-antimicrobial drugs such as thiazides, furosemide, some oral anti-diabetes drugs, and celecoxib (Celebrex) contain a sulfonyl component similar to that found in sulfonamide anti-microbial agents. Therefore the use of such agents has been considered contra-indicated in individuals with documented allergy to sulfa antimicrobials. But is there convincing evidence to support this impression?
Almost all of the evidence to support this contention has come from anecdotal case reports, persisting to the present (1,2). However, in a careful review of all the evidence in this area (3), Shapiro and Shear of the Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Canada came to a different conclusion. They pointed out that, in addition to containing the sulfonyl component common to the other agents mentioned, sulfa antimicrobials contain an aromatic amine group at the N4 position, and a substituted ring at the N1 position. Neither feature is present in the non-antimicrobial agents containing the sulfonyl component. The aromatic amine group at the N4 position alone is thought to be critical for the development of the sulfa hypersensitivity reaction and severe skin reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis. The substituted ring at the N1 position appears to be critical as the target for IgE-mediated adverse responses to sulfa anti-microbials.
There is no convincing epidemiologic evidence that there is an increased frequency of reactions to the non-antimicrobial agents containing the sulfonyl moiety in those allergic to sulfa anti-microbial agents. The listed contraindications appear to be based on theoretical concepts which do not appear to be valid.
References
1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72(10):930-1.
2. Cutis. 2003 ;71:235-8
3. Drug Saf 2001;24:239-47
http://www.aaaai.org/aadmc/quiz/2003/0703answer.html
materia3 said:re sulfa sensitivity, good question .....but the answer is no. Meformin was discussed previously as was lactic acidosis. I am happy to say that I personally know of no sulfa sensitive diabetic on sulfonyl oral anti diabetic agent who has ever developed an allergic reaction (adverse IgE mediated reaction) to their anti diabetes drug as they would to a sulfa based antimicrobial. The reason has been studied and is given below:
Many factors may contribute to the accumulation of lactic acid that causes lactic acidosis. Congestive heart failure or a temporary but severe fall in blood pressure during a heart attack can lead to a buildup of lactic acid. Metformin should be stopped when one of these conditions is discovered. It should not be used in someone with heart failure or liver disease.
Lactic acid levels increase when strenuous exercise or other conditions (such as heart failure, a severe infection, or shock) reduce the flow of blood and delivery of oxygen throughout the body. Lactic acid levels can also increase when the liver is severely damaged or diseased, because the liver normally breaks down lactic acid.
Do not take GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR if you:
have kidney problems
have liver problems
have heart failure that is treated with medicines, such as Lanoxin® (digoxin) or Lasix® (furosemide)
drink a lot of alcohol. This means you binge drink for short periods or drink all the time
are seriously dehydrated (have lost a lot of water from your body)
are going to have an x-ray procedure with injection of dyes (contrast agents)
are going to have surgery
develop a serious condition, such as heart attack, severe infection, or a stroke
are 80 years or older and you have NOT had your kidney function tested
LDH is most often measured to evaluate the presence of tissue damage. The enzyme LDH is in many body tissues, especially the heart, liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, brain, blood cells, and lungs.
LDH catalyzes the interconversion of pyruvate and lactate. Exercising muscles convert (and red blood cells metabolize) glucose to lactate. Lactate is released into the blood and is eventually taken up by the liver. The liver converts lactate back to glucose and releases glucose into the blood. This glucose is then taken up by resting muscles, red blood cells, and other tissues.
Lisa Simpson said:Completely and utterly anecdotal, but my sister-in-law is allergic to sulfa drugs, but took insulin just fine.
Badly Shaved Monkey said:First, define "sulphur based"
Kumar said:"S" is there in its chemical formula.![]()