sodakboy93 said:
An anti-vaxer I deal with on another board suggested that drug companies "control the curriculum" at medical schools.
Has he himself been to medical school? Has he taught in medical school? What knowledge does he have of the medical school curriculum, outside of his speculation? Has he seen the medical school curriculum?
That's what you should ask him, how he knows this.
sodakboy93 said:
How much influence, if any, do drug companies have other med school curriculum? Her claim was that what doctors know about vaccination is taught to them by Big Pharma.
Absolute rubbish. If anything, most "ivory tower" professors, especially during the pre-clinical part (i.e., first two years) of medical school have a high level of
disdain for pharma companies, who don't really provide much (if any) of the funding for their research... which is, I'm sure, what this anti-vaxer is insinuating or misrepresenting as part of his position. Most of them are bench PhDs, and they have next to ZERO interaction with pharma.
In the clinical years, the docs at the university teaching hospitals are on salary. They are academic researchers (most of them) involved in their own projects. Therefore, they don't listen to big pharma - they actually tell big pharma what to do, especially at the big institutions. We don't even use brand names of pharmaceutical compounds in school (which is a little difficult to get used to when you actually get into the clinic; you have to re-learn a lot of medicines you already know by their brand names).
This guy's insinuation is garbage. He's making the assertion; he should prove it. My guess is this is just some hot-air notion he dreamed up to support his crackpot theories, and he has no real idea of what he's talking about. At least, this has
fully been my experience in medical school: pharma companies have
no say in my curriculum. Not everything in medicine is about giving
medicines.
-TT