MG1962
Unregistered
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 17,252
Thanks to everyone who commented on the Galileo case. I believe that even in light of the information available in his day, Galileo’s arguments were much better than those of his opponents. But Thomas Henry Huxley and Augustus De Morgan thought otherwise, and I just wanted to read their statements in context.
A side issue: Galileo could be abrasive, but the arguments his contemporaries brought against him would try anyone’s patience, including that of a modern reader who tries to sort them out.
Galois
One of the hardest parts of any discussion like this is putting ourselves into the mindset of the people involved as well as the personalities. We only have the writings of the time to base our opinions off - The Church is not going to write anything that puts itself in a bad light and Galileo is not going to talk himself down either.
All up though regardless of your position it is a fascinating moment in history that provides endless musing and complications about events