The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 36,372
To me, this is possibly the worst kind of all, as it disguises itself under a veneer of respectability by quoting statistics.
An example would be black Americans incarceration and violence rates, using the criminal data to come to a conclusion that black Americans are a bad people who will not drag themselves out of the ghetto.
At least the Stormfront-style racist is quite open - he just wants nothing to do with people who are not white and considers them second-class, barely human animals. "Anthropoid" is the pejorative of choice of many, indicating that people of non-white colour are not quite human.
Good targets for intellectual racists include Native Americans, Hispanic and black Americans, New Zealand Maori and Australian Aboriginals.
There is no doubt each of those groups is hugely over-represented in negative criminal, health and social outcomes, yet the intellectual racist will never ask why that should be, merely content with sweeping those groups under the mat as "bad/weak/lazy people".
I believe there are a myriad of reasons why those people have such negative life outcomes, and much of it is the fault of those white racists and their forebears. Having destroyed their cultures through violence and introduced disease, white people left those groups to pick up their own pieces. And they have largely failed.
Germany and Japan were both given massive assistance after WWII which enabled them to recover, but when have we ever invested more than lip service in trying to raise the bar of the people oppressed for centuries in many cases?
Continuing the bigotry by quoting statistics without searching for the reasons behind the problem is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
An example would be black Americans incarceration and violence rates, using the criminal data to come to a conclusion that black Americans are a bad people who will not drag themselves out of the ghetto.
At least the Stormfront-style racist is quite open - he just wants nothing to do with people who are not white and considers them second-class, barely human animals. "Anthropoid" is the pejorative of choice of many, indicating that people of non-white colour are not quite human.
Good targets for intellectual racists include Native Americans, Hispanic and black Americans, New Zealand Maori and Australian Aboriginals.
There is no doubt each of those groups is hugely over-represented in negative criminal, health and social outcomes, yet the intellectual racist will never ask why that should be, merely content with sweeping those groups under the mat as "bad/weak/lazy people".
I believe there are a myriad of reasons why those people have such negative life outcomes, and much of it is the fault of those white racists and their forebears. Having destroyed their cultures through violence and introduced disease, white people left those groups to pick up their own pieces. And they have largely failed.
Germany and Japan were both given massive assistance after WWII which enabled them to recover, but when have we ever invested more than lip service in trying to raise the bar of the people oppressed for centuries in many cases?
Continuing the bigotry by quoting statistics without searching for the reasons behind the problem is part of the problem, not part of the solution.