• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proof positive that evolution is false

CORed said:
I wouldn't mind having a tail, but, how do I make pants work with that. Since I live in the US, where walking around with genitalia exposed will get you thrown in jail and in some states, including mine, get you put on a sex offender list, going without would not be an option, so, do tuck it down one leg (sounds uncomfortable, but, never having has a tail, I can't be sure), cut a hole in my pants (and underwear) to let the tail stick out (which runs a risk of showing a forbidden part of my anatomy), or do I modify my pants to have sort of a "third leg" to hold my tail? The last alternative might make getting dressed a little tricky.
Click to expand...
Kilt. :)
:SCOTLAND:
 
CORed said:
I wouldn't mind having a tail, but, how do I make pants work with that. Since I live in the US, where walking around with genitalia exposed will get you thrown in jail and in some states, including mine, get you put on a sex offender list, going without would not be an option, so, do tuck it down one leg (sounds uncomfortable, but, never having has a tail, I can't be sure), cut a hole in my pants (and underwear) to let the tail stick out (which runs a risk of showing a forbidden part of my anatomy), or do I modify my pants to have sort of a "third leg" to hold my tail? The last alternative might make getting dressed a little tricky.
Click to expand...

Firstly let me say...I WANT A TAIL! (prehensile, of course)

Secondly, you bring up vitally important points of tail etiquette.

I suppose it would depend whether we found it to be an erogenous zone. Perhaps, like ankles it was once a forbidden sight, requiring tail-socks and, as you suggest, a pouch in the back of trousers to accomodate it, but over time it would become accepted, then you could have a 'backfly' created so when hanging out in a bar you let it all hang out, but if your maiden aunt should visit then you could tuck it away again, just in case?
 
Debaser said:
Firstly let me say...I WANT A TAIL! (prehensile, of course)

Secondly, you bring up vitally important points of tail etiquette.

I suppose it would depend whether we found it to be an erogenous zone. Perhaps, like ankles it was once a forbidden sight, requiring tail-socks and, as you suggest, a pouch in the back of trousers to accomodate it, but over time it would become accepted, then you could have a 'backfly' created so when hanging out in a bar you let it all hang out, but if your maiden aunt should visit then you could tuck it away again, just in case?
Click to expand...

And persons over 40 years of age should not let their tails hang out in public. That's what the internet is for.
 
What is not humorous is that there are literally millions of otherwise normal-looking people in this country (U.S.) who agree 100% with the contents of that cartoon. What is sad is that they largely don't believe such things because they're necessarily less intelligent than folks who recognize this crap for what it is, but because they've been indoctrinated to believe it from childhood.
 
The Shrike said:
What is not humorous is that there are literally millions of otherwise normal-looking people in this country (U.S.) who agree 100% with the contents of that cartoon. What is sad is that they largely don't believe such things because they're necessarily less intelligent than folks who recognize this crap for what it is, but because they've been indoctrinated to believe it from childhood.
Click to expand...
You must live in the southeast.
 
I noticed something about this Chick track this time that I've never really seen before: Tyler (the headed-for-hell child) looks wacko-nuts with twirling eyes from the first panel. I think he was doomed from the start.
 
Maia said:
I noticed something about this Chick track this time that I've never really seen before: Tyler (the headed-for-hell child) looks wacko-nuts with twirling eyes from the first panel. I think he was doomed from the start.
Click to expand...

Nah, he's the smart one 'cause he asks questions. Cathy is the really creepy one, as is every fundie I've ever met who says crap like that.
 
Maybe God will evolve and eventually have another son that will let people out of hell after a mere million years or so.
 
Maia said:
I noticed something about this Chick track this time that I've never really seen before: Tyler (the headed-for-hell child) looks wacko-nuts with twirling eyes from the first panel. I think he was doomed from the start.
Click to expand...

It's true. Only the saving power of Jesus can clear up "wacky eye syndrome."
 
Hmmmm... so, if I understand that enlightening comic strip correctly, anyone who believes something other than what I believe should be demonised.

How deliciously christian of them to suggest. It's a special brand of tolerance.

It's like some sort of graphical hate crime. This person is probably working in political election advertising.
 
What I really enjoy is how Jack projects his racism onto evolution. He's innocently asking, "Well without God, there is no one to protect the blacks and the jews, so the master race will exterminate them, right?" The implicit assumption that he's made—that his racial group is obviously superior—is the poison in that soup, but he assumes that only God's moral influence holds people in check from making this "obvious" conclusion.

I always find these so revealing. Jack Chick is a large part of what helped me to escape conservative Christendom.
 
KirinDave said:
What I really enjoy is how Jack projects his racism onto evolution. He's innocently asking, "Well without God, there is no one to protect the blacks and the jews, so the master race will exterminate them, right?" The implicit assumption that he's made—that his racial group is obviously superior—is the poison in that soup, but he assumes that only God's moral influence holds people in check from making this "obvious" conclusion.

I always find these so revealing. Jack Chick is a large part of what helped me to escape conservative Christendom.
Click to expand...
Jack Chick is one thing that caused me to abandon religion altogether.
 
CORed said:
I wouldn't mind having a tail, but, how do I make pants work with that. Since I live in the US, where walking around with genitalia exposed will get you thrown in jail and in some states, including mine, get you put on a sex offender list, going without would not be an option, so, do tuck it down one leg (sounds uncomfortable, but, never having has a tail, I can't be sure), cut a hole in my pants (and underwear) to let the tail stick out (which runs a risk of showing a forbidden part of my anatomy), or do I modify my pants to have sort of a "third leg" to hold my tail? The last alternative might make getting dressed a little tricky.
Click to expand...

Nah, it would be simple. Just picture a smaller fly for the back of your pants, just like in the front, but without a zipper. Pull your pants up, position your tail, and do the snap above it.

Ya gotta go to furries with questions like these. We've been thinking about it for years. ;)
 
Last edited:
quarky said:
Maybe God will evolve and eventually have another son that will let people out of hell after a mere million years or so.
Click to expand...

I was just trying to be up-beat about eternal damnation, people.

Christ, skeptics can be so non-religious.
 
Screw evidence.

At some point, faith comes into it.

Evidence sucks.

Why is it so hard to see this?
 
Cainkane1 said:
The Duke of Wellington had a tail.
Click to expand...

Is that actually true? I can find no reliable account of the alleged tail.......

CORed said:
I wouldn't mind having a tail, but, how do I make pants work with that. Since I live in the US, where walking around with genitalia exposed will get you thrown in jail and in some states, including mine, get you put on a sex offender list, going without would not be an option, so, do tuck it down one leg (sounds uncomfortable, but, never having has a tail, I can't be sure), cut a hole in my pants (and underwear) to let the tail stick out (which runs a risk of showing a forbidden part of my anatomy), or do I modify my pants to have sort of a "third leg" to hold my tail? The last alternative might make getting dressed a little tricky.
Click to expand...
Would a tail count as genetalia? I can see that they'd made a lot of day-to-day activities somewhat uncomfortable without modifications to furniture et cetera. However I'm sure we'd adapt.
They just seem so useful. And fun.

Debaser said:
Firstly let me say...I WANT A TAIL! (prehensile, of course)

Secondly, you bring up vitally important points of tail etiquette.

I suppose it would depend whether we found it to be an erogenous zone. Perhaps, like ankles it was once a forbidden sight, requiring tail-socks and, as you suggest, a pouch in the back of trousers to accommodate it, but over time it would become accepted, then you could have a 'backfly' created so when hanging out in a bar you let it all hang out, but if your maiden aunt should visit then you could tuck it away again, just in case?
Click to expand...
Well it'd have to be prehensile, what's the point otherwise?:)
patchbunny said:
Nah, it would be simple. Just picture a smaller fly for the back of your pants, just like in the front, but without a zipper. Pull your pants up, position your tail, and do the snap above it.

Ya gotta go to furries with questions like these. We've been thinking about it for years. :)
Click to expand...
I bow to your superior knowledge of tail etiquette.:D But should one keep one's tail elevated? Or let it drag?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom