Proof of God's existence! 1 million dollar challenge at the end! Randi better pay-up!
Jedi Knight
Banned
- Joined
- May 21, 2002
- Messages
- 2,712
muscleman said:
I agree completely with this. Completely. Men have no free will.
JK
How can you hate something that doesn't exist?Franko said:
Emotional nonsense. Skeptics don't hate theists; we just get tired of doing their thinking for them.Franko said:
Skeptics and freethinkers don't burn books. That's the church's job.Franko said:
No, that's the Catholics.Franko said:
Give me an example where he has posted spam.Franko said:
No, that's you, Franko.Franko said:
Skeptics are rarely clueless, and unlike theists, when we don't know something, we admit it.Franko said:
No, that's theists.Franko said:
What does this mean in English?Franko said:
No.Franko said:
Here's a motion for you:
This house proposes that Franko is a trolling whackadoo.
Any seconds?
Has the proof been given yet?
Filippo Lippi
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 5,353
I hope he hasn't spent any of the $1million yet
I am honor'd.
I fear I have rather reduced the Bigotted Coward et Liar et Hypocrit to a level normally exhibited by muscrat that attempted to rut with an electric fence.
I had thought it impossible for him to sink lower in the estimations of Gentlemen and Ladies of Quality.
It appears I overestimated him.
As for the Bigotted Coward et Liar et Hypocrit, one can only hope he has spent some of his imaginary bullion upon typing and basic grammer skills.
--J.D.
I fear I have rather reduced the Bigotted Coward et Liar et Hypocrit to a level normally exhibited by muscrat that attempted to rut with an electric fence.
I had thought it impossible for him to sink lower in the estimations of Gentlemen and Ladies of Quality.
It appears I overestimated him.
As for the Bigotted Coward et Liar et Hypocrit, one can only hope he has spent some of his imaginary bullion upon typing and basic grammer skills.
--J.D.
muscleman
Unregistered
M
THIS TOPIC IS OVER. TRULY ATHEISTS' OMNISCIENCE/FREEWILL ARGUMENT TOPIC IS OVER...
Beleth has given me a perfect example. She claimed that if "God" was responsible for the existence of evil humans, then she would blaim God for them, but if the cause is NOT called "God", but called "Something else", then she would NOT blaim it but instead blaim the evil man, not the cause..
It seems like she got some hatred towards the word or the name "God", because if its mentioned, she would bring RESPONSIBILITY to him, but if the word "quantum mechanics pop into her mind, she dont care (AND THE FACT IS THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE REGARDLESS THE TITLE AND THE NAME YOU GIVE IT "QUANTUM MECHANICS, GOD, GHOSTLY INVISIBLE PHYSICS, ETC.").
So she denies it as she pleases, DENYING THE REALITY OF CAUSE, THAT EVEN SCIENCE SAYS THERE IS A CAUSE....
She insist that she has a cause, but the cause doesnt have control over her..THEREFORE DISAGGREING WITH SCIENCE. THE FACT IS WE ARE UNDER THE LAWS OF NATURE AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS..
beleth is now saying that she is supernatural...
beleth also disagrees when a driver hits his car and if both gets hurt (God and humanity). She doesnt agree with that, she only wish that the car DOES NOT get wrecked, ONLY THE DRIVER..
She has some sort of hatred against God, AND DISAGREES WITH SCIENCE..
But she claims to believe in God and believe in science..
strange isnt it, and she defends atheism....
----------------------------------------------------------------
Beleth, Ossai, has pointed to me by their own words, that the only think that is contradictory to this is "God is malicious for creating evil".. THATS IT, other than that, nothing contradicts.. But the fact is God is not just malicious, God is also good.. Atheists like to takes things out of context..
Why do I say we have freewill? BECAUSE ATHEISTS AND THEISTS COULD AGREE ON THE FACT THAT WE BOTH EXIST.. And if we both exist, then we should acknowledge freewill. bELETH ABOVE IS JUST BEING MORONIC....
Freewill= own accord; self act, etc.
To say humans dont have freewill is like saying "Tables, chairs, dont exist. But when I see a table, I see a tree where it comes from.". Your trying to say that iof you scratch the table, your not scratching the table, but your scratching the tree where it came from. Or scratching the designer responsible for its existence....
At some point we have to acknowledge that the table is its own existence, and the tree is a separate matter.. The table has been designed and some form of metals has been added to it.
Unless you acknowledge that the table exist, then you can never acknowledge freewill exist..
If we dont have freewill, then why bother putting peeps in prison? why bother? After all, they are not ON THEIR OWN ACCORD, THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE, BUT THEIR CAUSE IS (GOD, QUANTUM GHOSTLY PHYSICS, ETC...)..
The fact is we need to acknowledge our own responsibility and our own accord instead of blaiming the cause of our existence.,..
Beleth is an example of an atheists (complete moron). She would blaim her cause if its labeled "God"... But if her cause is labeled as "Quantum ghostly physics", then she would NOT blaim it, but blaim herself....
She is showing hatred for God, and also denying science..
SHE DENIES BEING UNDER THE LAWS OF NATURE AND DENIES BEING UNDER THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.. SHE IS CLAIMING TO BE SUPERNATURAL....
this argument proves atheism is a joke...
OSSAI KEEPS ON TELLING ME I HAVENT RESPONDED IN HIS POST, WHEN HIS POST HAS BEEN LONG DEBUNKED AND ANSWERED ALREADY...
DOCTOR X IN THE OTHER HAND IS TOO STRANGE, TRYING TO DEBATE TO ME ON THE EXISTENCE OF SOUL, WHEN I ALREADY TOLD HIM EVERYTHING I KNOW ABOUT A SOUL...
NOW SHALL WE MOVE ON SO THE PROOF OF GOD CAN BE PROVIDED?
Beleth has given me a perfect example. She claimed that if "God" was responsible for the existence of evil humans, then she would blaim God for them, but if the cause is NOT called "God", but called "Something else", then she would NOT blaim it but instead blaim the evil man, not the cause..
It seems like she got some hatred towards the word or the name "God", because if its mentioned, she would bring RESPONSIBILITY to him, but if the word "quantum mechanics pop into her mind, she dont care (AND THE FACT IS THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE REGARDLESS THE TITLE AND THE NAME YOU GIVE IT "QUANTUM MECHANICS, GOD, GHOSTLY INVISIBLE PHYSICS, ETC.").
So she denies it as she pleases, DENYING THE REALITY OF CAUSE, THAT EVEN SCIENCE SAYS THERE IS A CAUSE....
She insist that she has a cause, but the cause doesnt have control over her..THEREFORE DISAGGREING WITH SCIENCE. THE FACT IS WE ARE UNDER THE LAWS OF NATURE AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS..
beleth is now saying that she is supernatural...
beleth also disagrees when a driver hits his car and if both gets hurt (God and humanity). She doesnt agree with that, she only wish that the car DOES NOT get wrecked, ONLY THE DRIVER..
She has some sort of hatred against God, AND DISAGREES WITH SCIENCE..
But she claims to believe in God and believe in science..
strange isnt it, and she defends atheism....
----------------------------------------------------------------
Beleth, Ossai, has pointed to me by their own words, that the only think that is contradictory to this is "God is malicious for creating evil".. THATS IT, other than that, nothing contradicts.. But the fact is God is not just malicious, God is also good.. Atheists like to takes things out of context..
Why do I say we have freewill? BECAUSE ATHEISTS AND THEISTS COULD AGREE ON THE FACT THAT WE BOTH EXIST.. And if we both exist, then we should acknowledge freewill. bELETH ABOVE IS JUST BEING MORONIC....
Freewill= own accord; self act, etc.
To say humans dont have freewill is like saying "Tables, chairs, dont exist. But when I see a table, I see a tree where it comes from.". Your trying to say that iof you scratch the table, your not scratching the table, but your scratching the tree where it came from. Or scratching the designer responsible for its existence....
At some point we have to acknowledge that the table is its own existence, and the tree is a separate matter.. The table has been designed and some form of metals has been added to it.
Unless you acknowledge that the table exist, then you can never acknowledge freewill exist..
If we dont have freewill, then why bother putting peeps in prison? why bother? After all, they are not ON THEIR OWN ACCORD, THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE, BUT THEIR CAUSE IS (GOD, QUANTUM GHOSTLY PHYSICS, ETC...)..
The fact is we need to acknowledge our own responsibility and our own accord instead of blaiming the cause of our existence.,..
Beleth is an example of an atheists (complete moron). She would blaim her cause if its labeled "God"... But if her cause is labeled as "Quantum ghostly physics", then she would NOT blaim it, but blaim herself....
She is showing hatred for God, and also denying science..
SHE DENIES BEING UNDER THE LAWS OF NATURE AND DENIES BEING UNDER THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.. SHE IS CLAIMING TO BE SUPERNATURAL....
this argument proves atheism is a joke...
OSSAI KEEPS ON TELLING ME I HAVENT RESPONDED IN HIS POST, WHEN HIS POST HAS BEEN LONG DEBUNKED AND ANSWERED ALREADY...
DOCTOR X IN THE OTHER HAND IS TOO STRANGE, TRYING TO DEBATE TO ME ON THE EXISTENCE OF SOUL, WHEN I ALREADY TOLD HIM EVERYTHING I KNOW ABOUT A SOUL...
NOW SHALL WE MOVE ON SO THE PROOF OF GOD CAN BE PROVIDED?
muscleman
Unregistered
M
HOW IS THE PROOF OF GOD PROVIDED?
The proof of God is provided this way..
DEBUNKING ALL OF ATHEISTS ARGUMENT...
FOR INSTANCE, WHEN YOUR IN THE COURT AND SOME PROSECUTER ACCUSED YOU OF RAPING AND MURDERING HIS CLIENT'S DAUGHTER.. WITH THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED THAT YOU WERE LAST SEEN WITH HER, ETC.
YOUR JOB IN THE OTHER HAND IS TO DEBUNK ALL OF THE ACCUSATIONS, AND PROVE IT TO BE FALSE, BY USING SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND COMMON SENSE...
THATS HOW I AM GOING TO PROVE GOD... BY DEBUNKING ALL OF ATHEISTS ARGUMENT..
SO FAR ALL OF THEM HAS BEEN DEBUNKED ALREADY... ALL OF THEM (SOME OF YOU JUST SIMPLY DONT KNOW ABOUT IT..)
BUT THERE IS ONE MORE...
SO FAR THERE IS ONLY ONE LEFT I KNOW OF TO BE DEBUNKED...
AND THAT IS THE FAMOUS WORDS "SUPERNATURAL"...LOL
WHEN THIS TOPIC IS BEING DEALT, THE REAL FACE OF ATHEISM WILL APPEAR, COMPLETELY IGNORANT AND STUPID...I GUARANTEE IT....
The proof of God is provided this way..
DEBUNKING ALL OF ATHEISTS ARGUMENT...
FOR INSTANCE, WHEN YOUR IN THE COURT AND SOME PROSECUTER ACCUSED YOU OF RAPING AND MURDERING HIS CLIENT'S DAUGHTER.. WITH THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED THAT YOU WERE LAST SEEN WITH HER, ETC.
YOUR JOB IN THE OTHER HAND IS TO DEBUNK ALL OF THE ACCUSATIONS, AND PROVE IT TO BE FALSE, BY USING SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND COMMON SENSE...
THATS HOW I AM GOING TO PROVE GOD... BY DEBUNKING ALL OF ATHEISTS ARGUMENT..
SO FAR ALL OF THEM HAS BEEN DEBUNKED ALREADY... ALL OF THEM (SOME OF YOU JUST SIMPLY DONT KNOW ABOUT IT..)
BUT THERE IS ONE MORE...
SO FAR THERE IS ONLY ONE LEFT I KNOW OF TO BE DEBUNKED...
AND THAT IS THE FAMOUS WORDS "SUPERNATURAL"...LOL
WHEN THIS TOPIC IS BEING DEALT, THE REAL FACE OF ATHEISM WILL APPEAR, COMPLETELY IGNORANT AND STUPID...I GUARANTEE IT....
muscleman
Unregistered
M
Revelation is all Im interested, not convertion.. ( because we all know your guys are pigs..)
Now lets talk about supernatural little cults..
WHAT IS SUPERNATURAL? BEYOND THE LAWS OF NATURE? IF IT IS SUPERNATURAL THEREFORE IT DONT EXIST???
Now lets talk about supernatural little cults..
WHAT IS SUPERNATURAL? BEYOND THE LAWS OF NATURE? IF IT IS SUPERNATURAL THEREFORE IT DONT EXIST???
Perhaps it is a sense of noblese obligue that I correct some errors:
Better late than never?
Waiting. . . .
He shoots . . . he . . . misses the basket . . . opposing player gains possession, runs around him whilst he stands "amaz'd" and slam dunks.
I, for one, have yet to see any arguments actually address, let alone debunked. Of course, I am sure, in his imagination he has many wonderful fantisies, hopefully none of them involving children or bunnies [Stop that!--Ed.]
Nevertheless, I have yet to see him address the Child.
He is like a boxer claiming victory between spitting out teeth on the canvass having come to forty-five minutes after the arena cleared to celebrate with the victor. . . .
Then, again, at least the boxer had the courage to show up.
--J.D.
Better late than never?
Waiting. . . .
He shoots . . . he . . . misses the basket . . . opposing player gains possession, runs around him whilst he stands "amaz'd" and slam dunks.
I, for one, have yet to see any arguments actually address, let alone debunked. Of course, I am sure, in his imagination he has many wonderful fantisies, hopefully none of them involving children or bunnies [Stop that!--Ed.]
Nevertheless, I have yet to see him address the Child.
He is like a boxer claiming victory between spitting out teeth on the canvass having come to forty-five minutes after the arena cleared to celebrate with the victor. . . .
Then, again, at least the boxer had the courage to show up.
--J.D.
alfaniner
Penultimate Amazing
Re: HOW IS THE PROOF OF GOD PROVIDED?
Um, no. Just no.
muscleman said:
Um, no. Just no.
Penrich
Unregistered
P
Twisting someone's words does not mean that you have debunked their argument. Typing in all CAPS does not mean you have debunked any arguments.
Even debunking all atheist arguments will not prove YOUR God, because you will still have to debunk every other God that has ever "existed". Including the Invisible Pink Unicorn.
Even debunking all atheist arguments will not prove YOUR God, because you will still have to debunk every other God that has ever "existed". Including the Invisible Pink Unicorn.
Regnad Kcin
Penultimate Amazing
Wow.
Wow wow wow wow wow.
Wow wow wow wow wow.
neutrino_cannon
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2002
- Messages
- 2,574
Re: HOW IS THE PROOF OF GOD PROVIDED?
I see that you may be having some trouble with the "caps lock" on your keyboard.
I don't beleive that atheism is silly, and in fact, given what I have found about other religions, I find atheism to be the most logical veiw ong [G]od(s).
So what about atheism is stupid or ignorant as compared to other religions?
muscleman said:
I see that you may be having some trouble with the "caps lock" on your keyboard.
I don't beleive that atheism is silly, and in fact, given what I have found about other religions, I find atheism to be the most logical veiw ong [G]od(s).
So what about atheism is stupid or ignorant as compared to other religions?