*snip*
The first life form to evolve from earth is "Cell", the building blocks of life. It would take about 40,000 of your red blood cells to fill this letter O. A cell is alive-as alive as you are. It "breathes," takes in food, & gets rid of wastes. It also grows & reproduces (creates its own kind). And in time, it dies. An optical microscope can magnify a cell up to 2,000 times. An electron microscope can magnify a cell by 1 million times. An ant magnified 200,000 times would be more than 21/2 miles (4 kilometers) long. But even with such tremendous magnification, the detailed structure of some cell parts still cannot be seen.
Is it possible that a detailed and complex form happens by chance w/out an intelligent cause?
Yes, there is quite a chance. The primordial cells, or protocells were MUCH simpler than even the simplest cells we see to-day. They were really just a compound of primitive proteins. All these primitive proteins have been created in the laboratory, under conditions that probably existed in the early Earth.
Maybe there's a chance that computers could b formed by a series of hurricane/lightning/earthquake/ by Chance. Perhaps the lightning struck some rocks in place which caused it 2 melt & created wirings then the wind placed it in location where in *snip*
Nobody ever claimed that cells like the ones we know to-day just poped into existence. Bear in mind that those early biological entities had no competition.
For many years of observation & study, biochemists can only limitedly identify & label what’s contained in a cell, but never successful in creating one. *snip*
There is still things to be know about cells, but we have discovered most by now. No, we have not yet created one. Actually I dont know how hard we are trying, after all, it would be of limited use.
To use "natural physics" as an explanation for the atom to transform into a cell is not only unscientific, but also impossible!*snip*
We cannot explain EXACTLY how it happened, but it is far from impossible.
Don’t try to compare organisms to automobiles, car parts can wait before creating the rest of the parts, did u actually think there’s a brain lying around waiting for the rest of the parts to develop*snip*
This is a Creationist argument. I know you are a devout Catholic. Your Church accepts Evolution, so we need not discuss this.
Ill make it easier for atheist, lets make a magic step over the impossible of the impossible, let’s just pretend that scientists were able to successfully build a cell together! Even then Ill still believe in God for the fact is, intelligence is the cause of the detailed & complex effect (scientist effort) not series of tornado, earthquake, & lightning. If the super impossibility of creating a cell were made possible, it still won’t survive for it requires one or more of its own kind! (Observed & studied) Lets make another super ultimate impossibility possible, let’s just say it survived, how then did u expect it to multiply from a single cell considering the lifespan of it is very short?
Uh, this is simle ignorance. Single-celled organisms multiply by dividing. A single cell can multiply. This is easily observable and common biological knowledge.
If the dinosaurs with ultimate defense mechanism became instinct, how did u expect a defenseless delicate cell survive & replicate? By accident, coincidence, "chance", magic?
Well, it was more or less alone. An entire Earth, and no competition.
Evolution take is there was an earth w/a pond, hydrogen, methane & ammonia were in the pond & when lightning struck amino acids were formed, this has been demonstrated in the lab. Not all aminos were formed, however. Amino can form protein, & protein formed the first single cell. We have grave problems here because no one explains where the lightning, hydrogen, methane & ammonia came from & how to get around the missing aminos which are required for the over 200,000 proteins required for the single cell. No one can explain where ammonia, methane, hydrogen come from,
Dead wrong! Thide sustances were abundant on the early Earth, they are abundant in the Universe, and they are still abundant here to-day, but most are now tied up in more complex compounds.
but for the sake of sorry atheist, lets move on; Lets just say ammonia, methane, hydrogen popped out of nowhere magically & it formed amino acids/proteins thanks to lightning, the first single cell is composed of proteins, so what? So what if you can find a spare leg, heart, lungs, or arms out there? Does it mean that lightning, wind, & earthquake can gather the body parts together & create a living being? Do you think the wind will carry the arms, then the earthquake will shake the heart, &then the lightning will glue them together, &later on the spare parts became a living breathing person!? That’s absurd.
This is an Intelligent Design argument. We could look into that, but you should not need it, as your church accepts Evolution.
So what if lightning can create amino *snip* this HAVE NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF, NEVER HAVE AND NEVER EVER WILL. PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.the impossible of the impossible.
You are now repeating yourself. It has not been scientifically PROVED how life started. it has, however, been shown how it probably stared.
I don’t care what theory you use, *snip*top of the paper isn’t going to bring the red ink to life, weirdo.
You are now raving. Strong language wont prove your point.
Another especially strong evidence of God is the so-called anthropic principle, according to which the universe seems to have been specially designed from the beginning for human life to evolve. If the temperature of the primal fireball that resulted from the big bang some fifteen to twenty billion yrs ago, which was the beginning of our universe, had been a trillionth of a degree colder or hotter, the carbon molecule that is the foundation of all organic life could never have developed. The number of possible universes is trillions of trillions: only one of them could support human life: this one. Sounds suspiciously like a plot. *snip*
You are mistaking cause and effect. The present universe offers an exhaustive range of conditions. The Earth is not ideal for our life forms in order to accomodate us, its the other way around: We are here because this is the place where conditions are favorable.[
/b]
But doesn’t evolution explain everything without a divine designer? Just the opposite: Evolution is a beautiful example of design, a great clue to God. There’s very good scientific evidence for the evolving, ordered appearance of species, from simple to complex. But there is no scientific proof of natural selection as the mechanism of evolution, Natural selection "explains" the emergence of higher forms w/out intelligence design by the survival-of-the-fittest principle. But this is sheer theory. There is no evidence that abstract, theoretical thinking or altruistic love makes it easier for man to survive. How did they evolve then?
You are talking through your hat. Evolution is not sheer theoty, it is supported by a heavy amount of observation. Noe only that, but observations that seem to contradict evolution as the origin of humand are practically non-existent.
Furthermore, could the design that obviously now exist in a man & in a human brain come from something with less or no design? Such an explanation violates the principle of causality, which states that u cant get more in the effect than u had in the cause. If there is intelligence in the effect (man), there must b intelligence in the cause. But a universe ruled by blind chance has no intelligence.
How about the intelligence in some animals? Nobody ever claimed it happened by chance.
Therefore there must b a cause for human intelligence that transcends the universe: a mind behind the physical universe. (Most of the great scientists (Albert Einstein, etc.) have believed in such a mind, by the way, even those who did not accept any revealed religion.)
This doesn't follow at all. Einstein was a great physicist; this doesnt make him an authority on religion.
What created the first life form? Ask yourself that question. We have an explanation, we call it God. *snip*
You have that explanation. You might be right, but there is no proof, period.
"In the beggining was the Word, the Word was *snip* However, we disagree with "chance, coincidence, or Super Luck" as the cause for the extremely detailed & complex life form "cell", as I wrote above, that's already proven through scientific demonstration to be impossible!
Seems you have no idea what "scientific proof" means
