Prediction - August 4th 2004

Sorry Claus, but you have lost me on the whole "negligence" angle.

Imagine Luci really did have a vision of an attack, and he really did get the information "100+ casualties" and "Western target". What do you suggest he should do to prevent this disaster? What would "the authorities" (whoever they might be, since the country is not known) do about it?

You know yourself how vague it is. That's what makes it utterly useless, even if it's true.
 
TheBoyPaj said:
Sorry Claus, but you have lost me on the whole "negligence" angle.

Imagine Luci really did have a vision of an attack, and he really did get the information "100+ casualties" and "Western target". What do you suggest he should do to prevent this disaster? What would "the authorities" (whoever they might be, since the country is not known) do about it?

I don't know, but that is not Lucianarchy's problem. His problem is that if he really believes that he has a premonition about something that will kill people - and we are not talking about a few deaths here - then he has to contact the authorities, at least where he lives right now.

Of course, someone reporting a carnage like this would either be dismissed as a kook, or be hauled in for interrogation. If it later turned out that the prediction came true, he would most certainly be hauled in for a very thorough interrogation. But that's no excuse for not reporting it.

TheBoyPaj said:
You know yourself how vague it is. That's what makes it utterly useless, even if it's true.

Yes, I know. But if Lucianarchy later claims that he predicted such a bloodbath, then he also knew about it beforehand. Why should it matter how he knew about it? Heck, psychics can solve crimes, right?
 
I'm getting flashes that all these high-level security alerts are a godsend for Luci, of course something just awful was going to happen, but the vigilance of the authorities thankfully prevented it.

Rolfe.
 
My prediction is that on 4 August, 2004 +/- 24 hours Luci will finally implode from frustration, thus initiating the End Times.
 
Luci, I have read all of the previous posts about this subject.

I realize that you have no new information on the subject. I am merly asking for you to define for us what you have already predicted. You used the term "Western Target". I'm not asking you what "western target"; I'm asking you how you define western target. You used the word "attack". I'm not asking what kind of attack, I'm asking what you would define as an attack. Would a train derailing do to negligence be considered an attack? Would natural disasters be considered an attack by God? I wouldn't think so, but it's not my prediction. I'm asking if you think so.

All these questions are asking for your definition of something you've already predicted. I'm not asking for any new predictions.
I only want you to clarify what you mean in your original prediction.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Claus Larsen, for instance, on the Fallujah police station attack, said it was not a particularly nasty attack and refused to accept that the US/Coalition installed puppet police station in Fallujah .


So predictions have a left of center spin? Interesting.
 
I've seen this kind of thing on the web before, with missing children usually. The psychics always predict doom and gloom, never a happy outcome.

The reason: If the missing child indeed turns out to have been murdered, the psychic was right and she has scored a hit. Win for the psychic.

If the child turns up safe and well, the psychic says she was praying for this outcome and no-one could be happier that she is wrong: "I'm just so glad it's all over" etc. The psychic fawns over the child's 'miraculous' safety, and the skeptic is left with nowhere to go because he can't oppose the psychic without giving the appearance to observers that he is unhappy that the child is safe.
 
Countdown begun: Aug. 4th

The 4th of August has begun.

Let's recap. Lucianarchy has made the following prediction:

Lucianarchy said:
I percieve that something awful will occur that day. An attack on a Western target (UK, USA, Europe).

...

The 'awful' aspect of the perception seemed to project over 100 casualties (death or serious injury). I really hope I am wrong. But the perception was strong.

...

I perceive a Western target as one controlled / operated / symbolic of the Western forces of power - armed / industrial / social.

It has to be from terrorists:

Lucianarchy said:
It would only be significant if the allegations were proven and the attack was from terrorists

It has to be an "attack". It cannot be a natural disaster or accident:

Lucianarchy said:
I have said the perception was of an attack, not a accident or anything. There was definately malicious intent involved.

As to whether it is "self-evident", Lucianarchy has created a nice "out" for himself, though:

Lucianarchy said:
The significance needs to be self-evident.

...

There will be no judging, it will be self-evident, either way.

Lucianarchy has also made it clear that it means "self-evident, if anyone considers it self-evident". That means: If he thinks it is, then it is.

Where can we expect this?

Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, FYR Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican City, USA. There are some countries where only part is considered "European", but let's be generous and include everything. Let's also throw in Canada for good measures.
Source: Wikipedia

So, for the next 24 hours, let's watch the news....
 
This may have already been covered, but what side of the International Date Line are we talking about? It's still Aug. 3rd where I am.

(Better make it the next 48 hours).
 
CFLarsen said:
Where can we expect this?

Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, FYR Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican City, USA. There are some countries where only part is considered "European", but let's be generous and include everything. Let's also throw in Canada for good measures.
[/B]
What, Canada but not Mexico...?
 
mark tidwell said:
This may have already been covered, but what side of the International Date Line are we talking about? It's still Aug. 3rd where I am.

(Better make it the next 48 hours).

Fine with me. As long as it is August 4th anywhere on this planet.
 
I realise that at this point it's Aug 4th somewhere. Will this attack be a ingle event or the accumulated death/injuries throughout Aug 4th?

For example does this count if added to other things that might happen throughout the day?

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/08/03/iraq.main/index.html
Suicide car bomb kills 4 at Iraqi checkpoint Tuesday, August 3, 2004 Posted: 9:58 AM EDT (1358 GMT)
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Four Iraqi National Guardsman were killed and six wounded Tuesday when a suicide car bomb rocked a checkpoint near the eastern city of Baquba, police said.The suicide bomber was driving a 1979 Corona, and an Iraqi man believed to be involved in the attack was arrested, police said. Paperwork in the car indicated that the owner was Sudanese
The bomber was seen following vehicles of U.S.-led multinational forces, and the car bomb was detonated as they passed the checkpoint in the city north of Baghdad.

The morbid body count would now stand at:
dead / wounded
4 / 6

we might be 1/10th of the way if these are to be included.

JPK
 
JPK said:
Will this attack be a ingle event or the accumulated death/injuries throughout Aug 4th?

No. It has to be one attack:

An attack on a Western target

It has to be 100+ casualties:

over 100 casualties (death or serious injury).

It has to be by terrorists:

It would only be significant if the allegations were proven and the attack was from terrorists
 
TheBoyPaj said:
I would expect it to be August 4th at the place of the attack, rather than anywhere in the globe. Also, since Alaska is enjoying daylight saving time, the last few hours of August 4th will be limited to a few islands.

It would absolutely be the most reasonable. When did the 9-11 attacks happen in the Pacific? On 10-11??
 
CFLarsen said:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by BPSCG
What, Canada but not Mexico...?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Nope.
Why not? Canada is not part of the U.S. (guy on an Air Canada flight once felt it necessary to impart this little-known fact to me), and neither is Mexico.

If Canada is considered western by dint of being in the western hemisphere, so is Mexico, last time I checked.

If Canada is considered western because its ancestry is tied to a European country, so is Mexico.

C'mon - give Luci the benefit of one extra country.
 
BPSCG said:
Why not? Canada is not part of the U.S. (guy on an Air Canada flight once felt it necessary to impart this little-known fact to me), and neither is Mexico.

If Canada is considered western by dint of being in the western hemisphere, so is Mexico, last time I checked.

If Canada is considered western because its ancestry is tied to a European country, so is Mexico.

C'mon - give Luci the benefit of one extra country.

Fine. Whatever. Mexico is in.
 

Back
Top Bottom