Brown
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 12,984
From the Des Moines Register:
And by the way, which god or gods were being prayed to? Could we use a study like this to determine which religion is the correct one?
Hmm, I wonder how "retroactive" prayer is defined and controlled. Well, no matter. I guess it means that those who were prayed for died less often than others, eh? No, that doesn't seem to be the case:Olshansky and his co-author, Larry Dossey, the journal's executive editor, reviewed research that studied 3,393 septic patients. The researchers found that "retroactive" prayer, offered even four to 10 years later, affected the outcomes of the patients' cases.
Now, I haven't read the study (it appears in the British Medical Journal) and maybe I'm missing something, but does the study suggest that prayer isn't very effective where it counts? After all, one would think that the really important statistic is the one pertaining to whether people die, not the statistic pertaining to how long they are in the hospital. Does the study demonstrate that God is not omnipotent? In other words, does the study suggest that the Almighty is pretty successful in the fever-breaking department, but not too successful in the keeping-people-from-dying department?While the rate of mortality was similar between the prayer group and the non-prayer group, the length of stay in the hospital and the duration of fever were both shorter in the prayer group.
And by the way, which god or gods were being prayed to? Could we use a study like this to determine which religion is the correct one?
