• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pope Francis, Ratzinger, Welby, Prince Phillip "sued" for satanic ritual abuse

:)

Why is it always the Jesuits? ;)

And these "8 eyewitnesses". I expect they recovered the "memory" of the event through hypnosis. :oldroll:
 
Orphia Nay said:
From Judy Byington's Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/childabuserecovery
Click to expand...

Wow, they're stretching it. How far back goes this cult?
Evidence also could link to cult ceremonies [...] Dutch Queen Wilhemina, her family and consort King Hendrick, Belgian Royals and Bilderberger founder Crown Prince Bernhard.
Click to expand...
Queen Wilhelmina died in 1961. Her husband, prince consort Hendrik van Mecklenburg-Schwerin (and not Hendrick with an extra 'c'), died already in 1934.

And pfff, at last someone mentioned Bernhard. That was about time, no CT is complete without him (*). But who made him crown prince? Like Hendrik, he was prince consort.

(*) and with what is known about Bernhard, you can make non-Orangist (**) people believe anything about him.

(**) the Dutch meaning of "Orangist", not the Irish/Scottish one, Craig. ;)
 
Last edited:
Craig B said:
The pope raping two young girls and simultaneously murdering and eating babies in the presence of at least eight witnesses! I'm surprised none of these witnesses has succumbed to the temptation to sell the story to a tabloid newspaper. A pity the News of the World is defunct. It liked stories about naughty clerics, and would have paid well for this, I have no doubt.
Click to expand...

Are you sure about that? Weren't they just in on it as well, and exposed a few naughty low-level clerics to help hide the far more serious crimes of the upper echelons? Do you really believe the story that those bags Charlie Brooks disposed of in his garage only contained a laptop and porn DVDs? Hmm? Those are serious questions to be answered.
 
ddt said:
Are you sure about that? Weren't they just in on it as well, and exposed a few naughty low-level clerics to help hide the far more serious crimes of the upper echelons? Do you really believe the story that those bags Charlie Brooks disposed of in his garage only contained a laptop and porn DVDs? Hmm? Those are serious questions to be answered.
Click to expand...
Maybe the porn DVDs contained images of the pope engaged in the rape of two adolescents while dismembering and devouring babies. If so, no wonder Charlie hid it.
 
ddt said:
(*) and with what is known about Bernhard, you can make non-Orangist (**) people believe anything about him.

(**) the Dutch meaning of "Orangist", not the Irish/Scottish one, Craig. ;)
Click to expand...
You can make "Orangist" (Irish / Scottish sense) people believe the Pope rapes young girls while dismembering and eating babies at the altar. It's the "non-Orangist" (Irish / Scottish sense) people who are harder to convince of this.
 
pakeha said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that whois entry posted up earlier points to a Californian joke or prank of some sort.
I wonder why Byington fell for it?
Click to expand...

It's not an intentional joke. Kevin Annett really believes this stuff. It's just that the court's website isn't hosted in Brussels.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link, dear pakeha.

Hmm, I'm not sure how we can be sure whether it's an intentional scam or if he really believes he has the jurisdiction to convict anyone.

The court website no longer has the page about Freeman on the Land which Rational Wiki linked to, but it does have a guide to common law which mentions "sovereign" 6 times. ("Freeman on the Land" = "Sovereign Citizen Movement".) I'd suspected Annett might be a believer of that crap when I first heard of his "court".
 
Glad to oblige, Orphia Nay.
As always, follow the money, not the stated beliefs featured in the presentation. ;)
 
Thanks for the link, though it's very, very sad reading about the antics of these people.
Those FOTL are very easily manipulated and thus make easy prey for scammers.
 
Now I'm a fan of Kevin Annett. What an entertaining guy. Should recruit the equally entertaining ""Plenipotentiary-Judge" : David-Wynn: Miller to serve in his court.
 
ddt said:
The tigers, and other game, might disagree. He even shot a tiger after he founded the WWF. According to the Independent, his total tally of killing animals exceeds 30,000.
Click to expand...

Yes, and while I don't condone it, Philip's position on hunting is no different than many other aristocrats of his generation. If you are going to put him in the dock for the number of animals he has killed, you'd better line up quite a few Scottish and British landowners right beside him.

Doesn't make it right, but he's not alone. And, as I recall, the Queen also killed a tiger in Africa at one point in her reign. Add her to the dock.

How many of those other landowners are also raising society awareness of conservation? And how much of what they kill is all part of land and animal population management? I've read the Queen and Philip do make use of animals hunted at Balmoral and Sandringham and Windsor, between the royal kitchens and feeding their various staffs. I'm sure the WWF has accomplished some good in its history. So there is some give as well as take there, on Philip's part.

That doesn't excuse him for producing Charles, though. :D
 
desertgal said:
Yes, and while I don't condone it, Philip's position on hunting is no different than many other aristocrats of his generation. If you are going to put him in the dock for the number of animals he has killed, you'd better line up quite a few Scottish and British landowners right beside him.

Doesn't make it right, but he's not alone. And, as I recall, the Queen also killed a tiger in Africa at one point in her reign. Add her to the dock.

How many of those other landowners are also raising society awareness of conservation? And how much of what they kill is all part of land and animal population management? I've read the Queen and Philip do make use of animals hunted at Balmoral and Sandringham and Windsor, between the royal kitchens and feeding their various staffs. I'm sure the WWF has accomplished some good in its history. So there is some give as well as take there, on Philip's part.
Click to expand...
And add Philip's colleague and co-founder of the WWF, prince Bernhard of the Netherlands to the dock too. He loved to shoot elephants until he started to protect them through the WWF.

As far as I'm concerned, recreational hunting would be outlawed. But I recognize there's a vast difference between hunting abundant species like rabbits, or pheasants that are specially bred for the hunt, and endangered species like tigers. Philip and Bernhard should very well have known by the time they founded the WWF that tigers and elephants were endangered with extinction. The shooting of a tiger after he found the WWF is just gross.

desertgal said:
That doesn't excuse him for producing Charles, though. :D
Click to expand...
:D
 
desertgal said:
And, as I recall, the Queen also killed a tiger in Africa at one point in her reign. Add her to the dock.
Click to expand...
Since tigers are not native to Africa, she must have shot the beast in a zoo. I'm surprised she didn't end up in the dock for that.
 
Craig B said:
Since tigers are not native to Africa, she must have shot the beast in a zoo. I'm surprised she didn't end up in the dock for that.
Click to expand...

False dichotomy. It could also have been a tiger that escaped from an African zoo and roamed the streets. In which case, she should have gotten a medal for it. :boxedin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom