• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

>>> Please stop the CT-Troooth-Movement!

Bell said:
BS101 = Bull 5h!t 101 = TruthSeeker1234

101 is a term used for basic explaination on subjects.
Click to expand...

Ah! :blush: I fear he still does not know what i was talking about... Or he get´s paid for being BS101 ...or he is one of the higher troofers who makes his jokes with us... or he and christophera are the same person...

I apologize for my reaction, but this bomb, dust, CD-Crap makes me sick because it is so senseless to think about it - even for troofers... :mad:

ETA: Oh yes ... i forgot. They don´t use to think.
 
Last edited:
Seriously: What shall we do against these "Troofers"?
The most Parts in here are "blah blah blah" - what about getting active?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Say what you like, it is NIST which has violated the scientific method by ignoring so much relevant data. It is wholly unscientific to assert, without foundation, that "global collapse ensued". RMackey, and others, have asserted that "global collapse is obvious, inevitable". This is not a logical discussion, it is a naked assertion. It is not scientific to declare as "obvious" something unprecendented. Especially when doing so appears to violate fundamental laws of physics (in this case, the official story appears to violate conservation of energy).
Click to expand...
This is astonishing.

I hadn't even visited this thread, and you're still taking shots at me? Badly, I might add.

While I find the attention flattering, it would appear you're developing a rather unhealthy obsession with me. You might want to keep an eye on that.
 
If getting active would mean confronting the deniers on their own forum... well, you know what will happen to you :)
 
Bell said:
If getting active would mean confronting the deniers on their own forum... well, you know what will happen to you :)
Click to expand...

Mhmm, we could flood the whole forum with logic questions if we post them with many people at the same time over different threads. They would be to confused to bann everyone immediately and it would be hours of work to clean the board from the "JREF-truth"... But a lot of "innocent", non-militant CT´ists would get confronted with these questions... :rolleyes:


ETA:
It´s a bad Example because it´s about children, but what i mean, works nearly the same way:

"Children yearn for information. In most cases the adult will give them the information they want but there are other ways. In
this material there are examples of how an adult interrupts a dialogue without having given an answer, asks a counter question, attempts to further the mutual problematization among the children by remaining silent, gives information, recounts personal experiences and clarifies the child's question.

Children use questions which indicate a desire for reflection as well as knowledge. To these questions the adult responds with counter-
questions, by comparing and searching for knowledge and by offering his or her own knowledge and experience."
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom