There's two impressions on Powell here, not mutually exclusive.BPSCG said:During Clinton's second term, there was a lot of interest in Powell as the Republican nominee in 2000, and few people doubt he could have had the nomination for the asking.
Thing is, he didn't ask; in fact, he stated flat-out that he would not run. The "inside baseball" on this is that he didn't have the great passion to do so, while his wife was absolutely dead-set against it.
Zep said:And I believe I've mentioned before that more than one person thinks his current backpedalling from Bush's cabinet and campaign are a sign he knows, or at least suspects, he's on a losing team (even if Bush gets back in, it won't be good to be on his side). And no-one likes losers in US politics - losing rubs off on others. So better to sit this next term out, divorce himself from the current debacle, and reappear in 2008 or even 2012 as a clear winner. If he does, Kerry won't stand a chance...
richardm said:Oh, do try to get a sense of perspective. Charlie Brooker writes a humourous column in the TV pages of the Guardian. It's not intended to be a serious piece.
richardm said:....and published an apology, which he did, in fact, write himself.