No, I mean the claims that religious communities make that are easily shown false. Pretty much anything geological or historical. When they have a book, we get to point out passages and say them nay. Information theory, as practiced by the wooster, is much more slippery than that. There are a slew of terms they can miss-define and misuse. It becomes more of a philosophical stance than a mathematical one.
I remember when it was the fashion to dodge with Godel's Incompleteness theorem -- it had the sheen of mathematical truth, but was misapplied horridly, extended dreadfully, and if you tried to point this out, devotees would happily ignore anything that looked like a difficult (although correct) explanation.
To see how Shannon, codes and information theory is being misused already, take a look at this guy's site: http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/atheists-riddle-2/
