• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Philip Zelikow, impartial?

Dog Town said:
You sure see lots of shadows.
Click to expand...

Come off it. Who did they appoint first? Henry Kissinger.

Do you think they will appoint people who will view them critically? I think you start looking for shadows. After you have removed your head from the sand
 
gumboot said:
Why would he favour any myth? He's more likely to realise it IS a myth. And say so.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

He could be influenced to steer that commision to give a certain view to the public.

The commissioners should be chosen independently, thats all I ask.
 
I think this thread has lost its original meaning.


The Exucutive Director of the commission is an expert in creating "public myths".
Click to expand...

Now that we proved once and for all that he wasn't good at CREATING myths, can this thread be put to rest?
 
Docker said:
But he was appointed by Bush, so which myth do you think he will favour? A commission appointed by the government cant be impartial.
Click to expand...

Why not?

Judges and prosecutors are connected in a similar way, but I don't see every ruling in a prosecutors favor.

You're not even saying he just had a bias anymore, you're saying he's corrupt. I'm sorry to call you on this like everyone else, but if you're going to call the members of the 9/11 Commission corrupt, you're going to need at least some evidence.

Or do we need a commission to investigate the commission now too?
 
Docker said:
He was very connected to the administration. Wrote a book with condoleeza rice.
Click to expand...

Who was in "Bicentennial [N-word]", with Don King, who was in "The Devil's Advocate" with Charlize Theron, who was in "Trapped" with Kevin Bacon.

Connections mean next to nothing if you can't connect them with anything important.
 
Last edited:
dirtywick said:
Why not?

Judges and prosecutors are connected in a similar way, but I don't see every ruling in a prosecutors favor.

You're not even saying he just had a bias anymore, you're saying he's corrupt. I'm sorry to call you on this like everyone else, but if you're going to call the members of the 9/11 Commission corrupt, you're going to need at least some evidence.

Or do we need a commission to investigate the commission now too?
Click to expand...


Show me the post where I called him corrupt.
 
I think this thread has lost its original meaning.


The Exucutive Director of the commission is an expert in creating "public myths".
Click to expand...

Now that we proved once and for all that he wasn't good at CREATING myths, can this thread be put to rest?



*cough*
 
Garb said:
I think this thread has lost its original meaning.




Now that we proved once and for all that he wasn't good at CREATING myths, can this thread be put to rest?



*cough*
Click to expand...

How did you prove this?

You weren't involved in this discussion. You just jumped on the gravt train, pun intended
 
Docker said:
TAM if I were accused of negligence in my job would it be right that I choose the panel to investigate? Of course not.
Click to expand...

Ahhh...you are assuming that at the time the commission was hired to investigate the actionsof BUSH et al, but was that the purpose. The people that called for the 9/11 Investigation did not do so because they thought BUSH was negligent. Noone called for that investigation to look for BUSH negligence.

TAM
 
Docker said:
How did you prove this?

You weren't involved in this discussion. You just jumped on the gravt train, pun intended
Click to expand...

...

So what if I wasn't involved? Does that mean I can't provide a relevant discussion in this thread? No.

So essentially Docker has read a statement "my area of expertise is Adolf Hitler" and translated that as "I am Adolf Hitler".

Awesome. Keep up the good work.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

You remember.
 
I'll give you this - if you start with the premise that the US gov was a suspect in the crimes of 911 then any commission appointed by the US gov would be less than ideal. I start with a different premise - that someone else did it. Inasmuch that the US gov may have been asleep at the wheel then possibly we didn't get the most exhaustive and unbiased investigation of that. MYHOP or LIHOP has insufficent evidence to launch a new investigation. There is just no good evidence, just a lot of cynical, suspicious, opinions.
 
Docker said:
I dont trust the administration. There is a difference. Thats the tenth time I have been misrepresented in this thread. Nice tactic
Click to expand...

You are aware, it is a Republican dominated congress correct? Not trying to misrep ya in the least.
 
Docker said:
So this pdoherty is no longer here? Nice of you to talk about him when he cant respond..
Click to expand...
pdoherty in his own words...
pdoherty76 said:
my critical thinking skills are not good enough and i hope to improve them here
Click to expand...
pdoherty76 said:
this forum just amazes my because i have never been exposed to this "show me the proof" tactic before.
Click to expand...
pdoherty76 said:
if this site is for critical thinkers then surely thoughts will suffice not reams of evidence.
Click to expand...
pdoherty76 said:
What is wrong with speculation?...
I dont have to have evidence to have an opinion...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom