• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Personal speed test

wipeout said:
Running until you puke is just silly. You ever see a professional athlete do that when competiting? Nope.
Nice of you to answer your own question, but you're wrong. I've seen it many times.

And I'm not seriously suggesting that Suezoled run until she throws up. Lighten up.
 
Puking after strenuous exercise is a result of "lactate poisoning". Different people have different tolerance levels but everyone can experience the feeling if after a week of inaction goes to the gym and does 2 sets of 20 for every big muscle group.
 
When I was younger I could run a mile in close to 6 minutes. Now I'd be lucky to beat 10 minutes.
I'd be lucky to be able to get up from this chair in 10 minutes.
 
El Greco said:
Just for the record, running faster and faster after you achieve a certain VO2max and after you have got used in running close to the lactate threshold, requires to lose a good amount of weight. Assuming that a runner is already lean enough, the extra weight can only be muscle mass. Look at how undermuscled the best runners are.

Yet I read in some of those runner/workout magazines (yes, I know, such a consistently reliable source) that in order to be able to run without injury in the long term, muscle that is not worked so much when running must be worked in other ways, like weight lifting, to "even it all out."

The assertion was that running uses some muscles. If you don't exercise the muscles running doesn't touch, you risk greater injury because you've become "unbalanced;" too powerful in one group of muscles.

Hm, looking at this, it seems to make less sense than when I read it...
 
Suezoled said:


Yet I read in some of those runner/workout magazines (yes, I know, such a consistently reliable source) that in order to be able to run without injury in the long term, muscle that is not worked so much when running must be worked in other ways, like weight lifting, to "even it all out."

The assertion was that running uses some muscles. If you don't exercise the muscles running doesn't touch, you risk greater injury because you've become "unbalanced;" too powerful in one group of muscles.

Hm, looking at this, it seems to make less sense than when I read it...

This is a long subject, but in general, running without injuries has little to do with running as fast as you can. Many times, a balanced exercise program will compromise your running performance. In general, depending on the sport, there are some training regimes designed specifically in order to overcome SAID. In such training programs a very important parameter is the transfer of training result which is a measure of how effective the training is in improving sport-specific performance.

I could go on for ever here, but a good book on these things is Zatsiorsky's "Science and practice of strength training".
 
Michael Redman said:
Nice of you to answer your own question, but you're wrong. I've seen it many times.

Nicer still of me to give basic but useful information about heartrates too. Anyhow, I've seen enough sport to know that athletes throwing up from the physical stress of competition must be very rare as I've never seen it happen. I've seen just about everything else, but never that.

The point here is that if professionals don't it (or, at most, rarely), there's no need for amateurs to even get close.

And I'm not seriously suggesting that Suezoled run until she throws up. Lighten up.

My post used terms like "puke-free" and ends with a --->:p

Perhaps not completely serious itself, it would seem.
 
wipeout said:

Going up to the human maximum of 200 beats-per-minute, collapsing in a heap and then puking sounds stupid enough to have originated from the military.


200 bpm is hardly the human maximum. Many bike racers, both amateur and professional see numbers equal to or slightly higher than that.
 
My recollection is.....

Maximun Heart Rate = 220 - age

And you train at about 75 - 80% of that
 
Yep, BillyJoe just said what I've read as well.

John Harrison said:


200 bpm is hardly the human maximum. Many bike racers, both amateur and professional see numbers equal to or slightly higher than that.

That's terror for you. :D Actually, I know they did a heartrate study in F1 in 1982 which showed one driver getting up to 210 BPM briefly. It's at the end of Prof. Sid Watkins first book on medicine in F1.

For exercise, as far as I know from reading cycling magazines, the limit young adults would be looking at is 190 to 200 BPM but they don't need to go anywhere near that to train unless they are sprinting or something.
 
A lot of it is conditioned by individual talents and capabilities as well. I understand Lance Armstrong can maintain 190 + through an hour-long time time trial.
He supposedly has an incredible tolerance to lactic acid buildup.
 
Bikewer said:
A lot of it is conditioned by individual talents and capabilities as well. I understand Lance Armstrong can maintain 190 + through an hour-long time time trial.
He supposedly has an incredible tolerance to lactic acid buildup.

Yeah, here's the stats from Armstrong's official website, including the time trial one you mention:

Be like Lance - you wish:
Ever wondered what kind of numbers the boy can generate? Lance's coach, Chris Carmichael sent us these key stats for LA:

Resting heart rate: 32-34
VO2ml/kg: 83.8
Max power at VO2: 600 watts
Max heart rate: 201
Lactate Threshold HR: 178
Time Trial HR: 188-192
Pedal rpm's during TT: 95-100
Climbing rpm's: 80-85, sometimes faster when attacking
Average HR during endurance rides (4-6 hrs): 124-128
Average watts during endurance rides: 245-280 watts
Training miles/hours, endurance rides: 5- 6 hrs / 100-130miles

http://www.lancearmstrong.com/lance/online2.nsf/html/FAQ

Another 5 times tour winner, Miguel Indurain, had a resting heartrate of 28 BPM and his recovery rate of his heart was 190 BPM (at the top of a climb) down to 60 BPM (starting the descent) in 30 seconds!

No wonder he was called an alien by the other riders. :D
 
BillyJoe said:
My recollection is.....

Maximun Heart Rate = 220 - age

That's just a ballpark figure. My max heart rate is at least 192 - the formula would suggest 181. The cycling books I've read tend to emphasize lactate threshold as the important number anyway.

--Terry.
 
I didn't start running till I was about 27. Then I ran on average 3 miles a day till I was about 45, with about a 2 year gap after a knee injury. Osteo arthritis in both knees finally put an end to running in 2001.

My advice is stay off tarmac, concrete or steel surfaces. (I ran a lot on offshore helidecks. Not good.)

Certainly, noone sprints a mile. In my mid thirties, I could crank 8 miles in about 52 minutes. That wasn't sprinting, it was letting the power flow nice and steadily. I never ran against anyone, but I Thought I was pretty good, till one day I was passed by a UK Commonwealth runner (female), who went by me so fast I was nearly sucked off my feet by the vortex.

I still enjoyed running after that, but somehow it was never quite the same.

Look after your body. Soft surfaces, good shoes. Warm up properly and learn how to stretch. Drink plenty water, before you get thirsty. And run with a friend. It's twice the fun.
 
If god had wanted us to run, he wouldn't have given us the automobile.
 

Back
Top Bottom