Pentagon Theories

JihadJane said:
It's in the past tense because I stopped following Pentagon stuff because the whole controversy appeared to be a deliberately encouraged hoax, a red herring set up to distract and discredit 911 skeptics.
Click to expand...
Oh, do elaborate...
 
JihadJane said:
The 911 attacks weren't surprise, unexpected attacks, despite what people such as Kindasleezy Rice might have claimed at the time.
.
Click to expand...

So the many warnings of an Al Qaeda attack were real?

The declaration of war, by Al Qaeda, on the US was real?

PS, this is derailing this thread, start a new one if you wish.

 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
It's in the past tense because I stopped following Pentagon stuff because the whole controversy appeared to be a deliberately encouraged hoax, a red herring set up to distract and discredit 911 skeptics.
Click to expand...

Or, employing Occam's razor, it is also possible just that the "911 skeptics" are made up largely of paranoid fantasists prone to jumping to wild conclusions not based in fact, who descredit themselves as a result of this.

I am just throwing this out there for your consideration...
 
Last edited:
JamesB said:
Or, employing Occam's razor, it is also possible just that the "911 skeptics" are made up largely of paranoid fantasists prone to jumping to wild conclusions not based in fact, who descredit themselves as a result of this.

I am just throwing this out there for your consideration...
Click to expand...

Most people are remarkably easy to manipulate, not just fantasy, gossip-column stereotypes.
 
JihadJane said:
Most people are remarkably easy to manipulate, not just fantasy, gossip-column stereotypes.
Click to expand...

Unlike you who said

JihadJane said:
The 911 attacks weren't surprise, unexpected attacks, despite what people such as Kindasleezy Rice might have claimed at the time.
Click to expand...

So................

stateofgrace said:
So the many warnings of an Al Qaeda attack were real?


The declaration of war, by Al Qaeda, on the US was real?

PS, this is derailing this thread, start a new one if you wish.
Click to expand...

Were the warnings real? Or part of the same fantasy?
 
Last edited:
PhantomWolf said:
I know double o but I'm going to as well.

I know that when Boston got hold of NY to tell them about 11, they were told that they were busy dealing with a hijack (175) and Boston assumed they meant 11. I also know that when NY tried to get hold of the FAA Bosses in regard to 175, they were all in a meeting dealing with 11, but I haven't heard anything about 77 being an issue, especially since Indy wasn't involved with 11 and they all thought that 77 had crashed until they learned of 11 and 175 about 30 minutes later. Can you referance a source, or is it just confusion over flight numbers?
Click to expand...

I was remembering it from the movie based on the 9/11 commission report, the one hosted by Kevin Costner. I don't own the movie and I was going solely by memory. Maybe someone here owns it and can help me out.

ETA: On Native Soil. That's the movie. I'm not a very good googler.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
Most people are remarkably easy to manipulate, not just fantasy, gossip-column stereotypes.
Click to expand...

Manipulation implies some plan by a nefarious third party, there is also the fact that most people, and this does include the fantasists, are just stupid in their own right.

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
-Hanlon's Razor-
 
JihadJane said:
It's years since I've read much about Flight AA 77. I was more interested in where the Pentagon was hit than what hit it, why it was undefended and why the plane was not intercepted. At the time it seemed like the "what" controversy had been deliberately started by the lovely Mr Rumsfeld.

Witness reports and physical evidence appeared to indicate that a Boeing 757 had hit the building and that it was flight AA 77.
Click to expand...

Why would we need to defend it jane? has it got gold in it like fort knox? perhaps a whole ****load of munitions? some radioactive material? does it have biological weapons or nerve gas?

NO!! it has NONE of tha above. its an EFFIN OFFICE BUILDING!! The largest office building in the world. Care to target a specific individual like Rummy? or Cheney? Good luck with that!! Find out what wing their in. or even ring. they may be or may not even be there. Look what percentage of the frickin building was totaled when a jumbo jet crashed into it at 500mph jane. less that 20%!! Truthers need to get their heads out of their ***.
 
JihadJane said:
It's in the past tense because I stopped following Pentagon stuff because the whole controversy appeared to be a deliberately encouraged hoax, a red herring set up to distract and discredit 911 skeptics.
Click to expand...

Yep, Thierry Meyssan, Dylan Avery, whoever made In Plane Site, Ranquis, Cap'n Bob, et al, are all working for Dick Cheney or somehow, unbeknownst to them, encouraged by him in order to discredit "real truthers". That is so much more likely than the obvious answer that these people are complete idiots. Disinfo shills! You've figured it all out! Congratulations!
 
Last edited:
Off topic posts moved. Please post on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom