• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Peer Reviewed Windshield

Unsecured Coins

Hoku-maniac
Unsecured Coins
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
5,905
A split from the peer review thread where Skippy makes the claim that this

CE350.gif

is a bullet hole that is bug enough to "put a pencil through"

upon further, closer-upper review, this is that "bullet hole"
CE350W.gif

Now, i give Rev91 a shot at proving that the above image is in fact, a hole in glass made by a 6.5 x 52 mm bullet. Is that really the exit wound that a bullet of that caliber would leave, or is it something more.... devious?

one_million_dr_evil.jpg
 
Since it's well known that Mike Myers is from Canada, and it's also well known that all Canadians are Alien Lizard people (see photo as passed through several Photoshop to prove he's an Alien Lizard):

one_million_dr_evil_LIZARD.jpg

And since you place the crack through the same filters, you get his image repeated throughout the crack:

CE350WLIZARD.jpg

The crack is no doubt caused by the Hollywood Scienzionists making yet another really bad Mike Myers movie.

CE350_DOYOUSEE.jpg
 
Unsecured Coins said:
upon further, closer-upper review, this is that "bullet hole"
http://home.comcast.net/~the-puzzle-palace/CE350W.gif
Now, i give Rev91 a shot at proving that the above image is in fact, a hole in glass made by a 6.5 x 52 mm bullet. Is that really the exit wound that a bullet of that caliber would leave, or is it something more.... devious?
Click to expand...

What you have to understand is that an eyewitness said it was a bullet hole, and that is more reliable than photographic evidence. In the same way, the photographs of the north side of WTC7 that show small fires prove that there weren't any fires on the south side, because photographic evidence is more reliable than eyewitness testimony. Just like the fact that AA77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, because cunning logical deduction is more reliable than eyewitness testimony and physical evidence combined.

Dave
 
It's not a hole, it's a crack. The damage was done to the inside of the windshield and doesn't extend to the outer surface of the glass. It's not a hole, and the fragment that hit it came from inside the car.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
bump for rev
Click to expand...
Sparky has a habit of disappearing when threads aren't going his way and by not going his way, I mean he's required to focus on a single issue and he's backed himself into a corner. This forum is littered with threads like that.

He loves those threads that bounce around which lets him cherry pick the ones he can fire off his zany one liners.
 
awww... but I was soooo looking forward into seeing how far his ballistic knowledge was...


i am a sad panda
 
It's probably Hungarian glass. It has all sorts of weird properties; when the Soviets came in and put down the 1956 revolution, many of the rebel leaders committed suicide by jumping out windows that, to the untrained observer, seemed to close after them.
 
Dave Rogers said:
What you have to understand is that an eyewitness said it was a bullet hole, and that is more reliable than photographic evidence. In the same way, the photographs of the north side of WTC7 that show small fires prove that there weren't any fires on the south side, because photographic evidence is more reliable than eyewitness testimony. Just like the fact that AA77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, because cunning logical deduction is more reliable than eyewitness testimony and physical evidence combined.

Dave
Click to expand...

ha ha ha ha

This is exactly the mindset of a conspiracy theorist.
 
hellaeon said:
ha ha ha ha

This is exactly the mindset of a conspiracy theorist.
Click to expand...

The only missing element is the reference to the reliability of the witness, who's a respected member of his local community. Are you calling him a LIAR?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom