To paraphrase William Paley (Natural Theology), if you're walking along and find a finely crafted Iron Maiden, with fresh blood stains on it, no less, do you suppose it was put together by chance, or an Intelligent Designer?
I actually just had a creationist try that with me on BlizzForums! Here was my reply:
….
You (or any creationists) basically have two options here. The first is to concede that God created a fairly grotesque assortment of parasites specifically designed to cause a great deal of gratuitous suffering to both people and animals. Look up the symptoms of Bancroftian filariasis, for example. The second is to concede that changes wraught by mutation and natural selection are capable of producing complex, multipart "irreducibly grotesque" adaptations from earlier benign ones, which pretty much destroys any apologetic value of the design argument. Take your pick.
Silicon said:I would enjoy this more if it were a straight parody, OR if it were a straight instructional tool on how the wheels fall off the ID wagon.
I would drop the "I hope an id proponent mistakes this for real and starts to use it" approach.
Much MUCH cooler would be if you were using it as a creationist argument that GOD IS EVIL! REALLY REALLY EVIL! Heheh.
But COOLER STILL would be if you wrote it as a serious lesson in where ID fails...
Yahzi said:To paraphrase William Paley (Natural Theology), if you're walking along and find a finely crafted Iron Maiden, with fresh blood stains on it, no less, do you suppose it was put together by chance, or an Intelligent Designer?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genius!!!
Scot C. Trypal said:It’d be interesting to know which is seen as more preferable, or if another option is taken (Though I’m not sure what that’d be).
The implications are interesting. In The Extended Phenotype, Dawkins talks about organisms having genetic information which essentially codes for traits in another organism.Originally posted by sorgoth
The mind-control barnacles are the most... "WTF?" though.
I didn't even know things like that existed!
I'm guessing something along the lines of:Scot C. Trypal said:WinAce wrote:
Was there a choice made?
It’d be interesting to know which is seen as more preferable, or if another option is taken (Though I’m not sure what that’d be).