I'm just starting a Bachelor of Education and my teacher for Gr. 1-8 Mathematics told us in the first class that she had a math problem with no answer next week. She shared the anecdote that a student from last year had written her afterwards asking what the "real" answer was, which was laughable because there wasn't one. Now I'm sure there are good questions like that, but I was shocked when this turned out to be the question:
I saw it and immediately saw the answer was +20. Because of what she'd said in advance, I tried numerous strategies and always got the same answer. So I was confused. Most people in the class ended up getting +20 as well, which puzzled the professor until one girl admitted to getting +10. Apparently all her other sections got several different answers to this question (scary!!). She tried to explain how she'd done it, and she'd used a confusing verbal approach, which to me isn't a valid strategy when you talk yourself into a wrong answer. So I asked what exactly what was open-ended about this question, because she'd been presenting it as though a variety of answers was a good thing. Apparently she'd done it herself individually and with a team of other adults and gotten different answers. But I argued that since we were dealing with concrete numbers, this was not a question with different possible answers. I recognize the value of questions with multiple solution strategies, but I told her I was sure I could find some better "open-ended" problems. I mentioned the Missing Dollar and Monty Hall and forwarded those to her, but I was wondering if anyone else knew some good ones that aren't so pathetically easy. Or even better, that have multiple valid answers. Is that even possible in say, high school level math?A woman bought a horse for $50 and sold it for $60. She then bought the horse back for $70 and sold it again for $80.
What do you think was the financial outcome of these transactions? The woman . . .
- Lost $10
- Earned $10
- Lost $20
- Earned $20
- Came out even
- Other (Describe)
Explain your reasoning.
Last edited: