davefoc
Philosopher
Caveat: I've hardly read any of this thread.
How do the US gun violence per capita statistics compare with the Australian gun violence per capita statistics?
It seems like a comparison might be useful, given the similarities between the US and Australia.
I looked around a bit trying to find an answer to my question without a great deal of success but I did find a statistic that said that US gun death rate was 10.2 per hundred thousand and the UK death rate was .25 per hundred thousand. But the US is a country of immigrant hot heads whereas the UK is a country of calm people that are happy where they were born, so maybe that's a more important factor than gun ownership. So a comparison with Australia might control for that factor since I believe that Australia consists of the descendants of criminals from England and the indigenous people.
My apologies to everybody concerned. It was late and it seemed funny when I wrote it. It clearly was taken more seriously than I intended and now people have made posts noting that I was a jerk and I was wrong, which is what happens I guess when you are a jerk and you are wrong.
Still I am curious about how the gun deaths stack up between the three countries. And since the UK has so many less gun deaths than the US does that translate into more murders and more suicides by other causes or do less guns just translate into less deaths? I am pretty sure the per capita murder rate in the UK is less than that of the US. Is gun ownership the principal difference?
I know from watching a lot of Inspector Morse episodes that the British are always having affairs and killing each other over them and then killing more people to cover up from the murders caused by the affairs so I guess the must translate into quite a few murders?
The last paragraph is my sad attempt at another joke.
ETA: It was interesting that the percentage of immigrants in the UK was higher than in the US.
Last edited: