Par
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 2,768
ETA: That was directed at Galileo, not Par.
I'm glad to hear the Oxford Dictionary agrees with me.
Do you only read every other word of a given piece of text? It would explain a lot.
ETA: That was directed at Galileo, not Par.
I'm glad to hear the Oxford Dictionary agrees with me.
Fighter Pilots are not preprogrammed zombies, they occasionally use their brain and their skill to do the job they are asked to do. While it may seem to be a minor issue to those who haven't been asked to do this, I can assure it is important to the Fighter Pilot Community. Thanks....
********! Everybody knows that fighter pilots, just like the FDNY, the special forces, the FBI, the CIA and the MIB are trained since childhood to execute without question and reservation all orders given to them. That's why the dozen of people responsible for rigging the WTC with explosive will never come to light, as they don't know remorse and are pround to have followed the orders from their Master Bush without question.
If they weren't controlling the fighters, then who was? Please refer to the quote from my first post.
This clearly indicates it is an Navy controller who is talking to the fighters, doesn't it?
Huh? Are you kidding? Didn't you read the 9/11 Commission Report? The most important communications of the day, the actual orders to the fighters in their cockpits, seem to have disappeared.
BTW (to all) how long does it take to scramble a couple of fighters and get them airborne?
Quit 2-5 and Quit 2-6 (The Langley fighters) were airborne at 0930EDT. They only flew in the wrong direction for four minutes. Allowing 8 minutes of incorrect flying direction (4 minutes out, 4 minutes back), and subtracting that from the time they arrived over Washington DC, we get an on-site arrival time of 1002EDT - too late to stop AA77.
-Gumboot
It made all the difference with regards to what?I guess that 8 mins made all the difference.
I guess that 8 mins made all the difference.
Quit 2-5 and Quit 2-6 (The Langley fighters) were airborne at 0930EDT. They only flew in the wrong direction for four minutes. Allowing 8 minutes of incorrect flying direction (4 minutes out, 4 minutes back), and subtracting that from the time they arrived over Washington DC, we get an on-site arrival time of 1002EDT - too late to stop AA77.
-Gumboot
They mention it here...Gumboot, Do you have a reference for that arrival time over DC or are you guessing? I thought they pulled the stops out after they realized the urgency.
Vanity Fair said:09:38:50
NASYPANY: We need to get those back up there—I don't care how many windows you break!… Goddammit! O.K. Push 'em back!
But the Pentagon is already in flames, American 77 having plowed through the E-ring of the west side of the building seconds before, at 9:37:46. The Langley fighters will not be established over Washington for another 20 minutes.
...
Then, over a crackly radio, one of the Langley fighter pilots, now in a combat air patrol over Washington, is calling in urgently.
10:07:08
PILOT: Baltimore is saying something about an aircraft over the White House. Any words?
CITINO: Negative. Stand by. Do you copy that, SD [Major Fox]? Center said there's an aircraft over the White House. Any words?
FOX: M.C.C. [Nasypany], we've got an aircraft reported over the White House.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?printable=true¤tPage=all
With regards to the 9/11 Commission Report they talk about the arrival of the fighters over Washington here (emphasis mine)...Gumboot, Do you have a reference for that arrival time over DC or are you guessing? I thought they pulled the stops out after they realized the urgency.
9/11 Commission Report said:After the 9:36 call to NEADS about the unidentified aircraft a few miles from the White House, the Langley fighters were ordered to Washington,D.C. Controllers at NEADS located an unknown primary radar track, but “it kind of faded” over Washington.The time was 9:38.The Pentagon had been struck by American 77 at 9:37:46.The Langley fighters were about 150 miles away.
9/11 Commission Report said:At the same time, the NEADS mission crew commander was dealing with the arrival of the Langley fighters over Washington,D.C., sorting out what their orders were with respect to potential targets. Shortly after 10:10, and having no knowledge either that United 93 had been heading toward Washington or that it had crashed, he explicitly instructed the Langley fighters: “negative—negative clearance to shoot” aircraft over the nation's capital.
I have had questions for some time about a NORAD incident in 1983. It seems after some failures by personnel to launch their missiles in drill scenerios, the US briefly put the entire system completely under computer control.
I have seen evidence that a young high school student was able to hack into the War Operation Plan Response computer at NORAD and convince it to run a simulation of global thermonuclear war. This began a chain of events that came seconds from ending in the launch of a comprehensive nuclear first strike against the Soviets.
My information indicates that NORAD was utterly unable to control its own systems and, in the end, the same teenager was the only one who could disable the computer.
Can you honestly deny this?
With regards to the 9/11 Commission Report they talk about the arrival of the fighters over Washington here (emphasis mine)...
Quit 2-5 and Quit 2-6 (The Langley fighters) were airborne at 0930EDT. They only flew in the wrong direction for four minutes. Allowing 8 minutes of incorrect flying direction (4 minutes out, 4 minutes back), and subtracting that from the time they arrived over Washington DC, we get an on-site arrival time of 1002EDT - too late to stop AA77.
-Gumboot
However, whichever way it goes, 8 minutes would likely be the maximum possible time they lost, the likelihood is it was a lot less. (of course that makes the case of them getting there too late regardless even stonger.)
I.m not familiar with that conversation, but the two fighters at Otis were handed off to FACSFAC VACAPES (Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility, Virginia Capes) for a short period of time, my guess is the same could have happened down there. They control all of the warning areas from W-105 south of Nantucket, all the way down to South Carolina. There Call Sign is "Giant Killer". After the fighters got off from Otis, and the WTC had been reported to be hit, there was no real need for the fighters to go over the city, for what at that time was considered an accident. They were cleared into W-105. This also was obviously a mistake. Remember Boston Center did not know that UAL175 had been hijacked. That aircraft was hijacked on the frequency transfer from Boston to New York Center. After the second tower was hit the fighters were there lickity split.Gumboot,
I have learned from one of your posts that it was actually Navy ATC controlling the fighters scrambled from Otis and Langley.
Who exactly were the Navy controllers who were handling the fighters? Who was the guy Huckabone wanted to choke? Do we know their names? What is their story? Where were they based? Were they housed inside the NEADS complex in upstate New York? Or were they out to sea at the time?
Cheap Shot, I would like to hear your input on this as well.
The military and the FAA at the time of the initial review by the 9-11 commision were basing their responses on the information available at the time. Though they did not have the exact conversation on tape why the Langley fighters were launched, they determined it was for AAL77 becasue that is what made sense at the time. When the other NEAD tapes were reviewed between September of 2002 through January 2003, the more precise information was revealed, that the fighters were actually launched for the Phantom AAL11, and that the military was never notified by the FAA regarding AAL77 except just prior to impact at the Pentagon.We know that some of the initial accounts told to the 9/11 Commission regarding the responses of various entities were false. When the truth came out, the commission members remarked that the truth put everyone in a better light. As I understand it, the truth is what was included in the 9/11 CR, since this was exposed during the investigation.
Which leads to the question of where and why the false stories were told. It seems to me that the false stories inflate the abilities of the pre-9/11 entities to respond and communicate. A plausible reason for this, in my opinion, is to ward off any potential terrorist attacks by putting out misinformation about how close the US came to intercepting the flights. I welcome any comments yea or nay on this.