• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

No matter what I say, the Christian won't budge...

Checkmite

Skepticifimisticalationist
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Messages
29,007
Location
Gulf Coast
Another Long Post™ from yours truly!

First, the backstory. Last night (or more technically "two nights past", since it's 1 in the morning now), I was returning from a visit to a friend in Huron. Here in Ohio, Huron lies approxamately halfway between the towns of Vermilion and Sandusky, along the lakeshore. Check a map. Anyway, I was driving along a desolate section of SR 6 west of Vermilion when I developed a flat tire. I was getting out the donut and jack and all that, when an old white Suburban which had passed me suddenly stopped and reversed. Coming up next to me, the driver asked if I needed help. I told him I didn't; but since he could see I didn't have much light, he practically insisted on parking his truck with the headlamps on at an angle which illuminated the bad tire. (Yes, yes, I'm coming to the relevant part...bear with me.)

He got out and helped with the frozen lugnuts, and proceeded to chat me up while I was changing the tire. I didn't mind, as there really wasn't much else he could do anyway. He asked where I was from, or going, (Lorain, I told him) and small things like that.

He said to me, "You look familiar...where do you go to church? In Lorain?" It brought me up short for only an instant, and I replied that no, I went to the Unitarian Church in Oberlin...you can all thank Upchurch for that. He asked if that were some sort of nondenominational-type church, to which I replied - in all honesty - "yes". I asked him where he went, and he said "Church on the North Coast, on (route) 58". That was all, as far as church discussion went.

Naturally, being as proficient as I am with cars (bask, bask) I was quickly tightening the lugnuts on the donut. After thanking him, he turned back towards his truck. Halfway there, he stopped and turned around, coming back to me. By way of explanation, he said "The Lord just spoke to my heart. He wants me to give you this..." and he held out a ten-spot. I quickly told him it was all right, that I really didn't need money at that time. He waved it off, "No, I'm sure God wants you to have this." Well, who am I to argue with God? I took it. After exchanging pleasantries, he left. I packed up all the gear and threw the offending tire in the trunk, and continued on back home.

On the entire way home, I was thinking about the encounter. The funny thing is, I was having something of an argument in my head. There was a cynical side, trying to make me angry, and an understanding side, trying to explain things better. The subject was the man's actions.

Perhaps I should explain. I've had experiences with Church on the North Coast before. The place opened up, I think, while I was in high school. It has its own school of course, with a Youth Minister and all that, but being Christian it is not content with what it has and seeks to expand. It had called (culled?) a number of students from my school with whom I was familiar; several of them were real bad types before going to the Church, but afterwards they were practically glowing. I attended, out of curiosity, a meeting of the Bible Club they set up in my school. There already was a sort of liberal "Christians" club, which I didn't belong to but didn't look down upon. This new club, however, was odd. What started out as a "prayer guidance" session with another new kid turned into a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ revival, in which they encouraged him to speak in tongues. It was actually quite funny...he didn't know the first thing about "tongues", so they explained that he just needed to "let the sounds happen". Well he let some rather repetitive sounds "happen", but it was clear he wasn't convinced. I ditched the party.

I have an old friend who had a delinquent son who was protected by the Church after he stole the family van and ran off. The van was found later, but the son wasn't...he went to stay with someone, and ended up going to the Church. Acting on a tip, the police went to visit the Church on one of their "Wednesday youth potlucks", hoping to apprehend the kid; they were stalled at the door by the Youth Minister long enough for the kid to "sneak out the back" for all intents and purposes. The cops are not fond of the Church.

I've never been inside the Church, or seen their program. They've got a website here, though it seems to be in very bad shape compared to the last time I looked in on it a few years ago. However, the way its people act reminds me of another church I have had a more direct experience with, The Cornerstone Church in San Antonio. Both churches are not content to let their members be "Sunday-morning Christians", but involve everyone in a sort of "cirriculum". Cornerstone divides its congregations into Prayer Cells (yes, cells...sounds almost cryptic, doesn't it?), and one of the activities at weekly cell meetings involves members standing up and speaking out about whatever "good deeds" they have done that week. This was also a key feature of the new "Bible Club" in my school that was started by the North Coasters, so it's not unreasonable to believe that the North Coast Church has its members do something similar.

All this ran through my mind when playing over the events of night before last. I remembered how the man drove past, then reversed and stopped to help. I remembered how he went to his truck, then stopped and came back to explain the God wanted me to have an extra ten dollars. The cynical side of me kept thinking, "I'm just his weekly "Good Deed", another point to get into heaven, or at the very least to brag to his "cell", or whatever the hell they call them at North Coast, about. I remembered him chatting me up and quickly introducing church talk. I felt preyed upon...a man in need of help is an easy mark, after all.

But then I reconsidered. The guy helped me out, and hadn't pressured me into anything. Why was I getting angry at him? Indeed, Christians' world viewpoint differs vastly from my own. But do such differences warrant anger? As I thought this over, I recalled a thread on this very forum, from a while ago. The thread starter (I think) was in a department store line and noticed the person ahead of him was short some money. He gave the extra money needed, whereupon the cashier (again, I think...IIRC) remarked "You must be Christian". This made the thread starter - and a lot of people who replied - angry. Indeed, I suppose the insinuation is insulting...are only Christians able to be generous? But it seems to me that the cashier probably wasn't consciously thinking of sleighting non-Christians. What makes people think things like this then?

Well, it's obvious that "God" did not talk to my highway benefactor. It was nothing more than his own conscience, urging him to be generous. Deep down inside, this guy was just a really good person. Even if it did take him a moment or two to consider stopping, or a moment or two to consider giving the money. So why the talk about "God"?

The talk about God was the result of what he'd been led to believe his entire life. It is a result of the worst thing - in my opinion - about Christianity, which just so happens to be such a core concept of Christianity that without it, there would be no Christianity. The concept is simply this - that humans are inherently evil. People can, autonomously, do nothing good or pure. Original sin. Most people think Grace is the core concept of Christianity, but it isn't - it's this Evilness, this ipso-facto taint upon us all, simply by virtue of what we are, that makes Grace necessary. We need to be saved, because of this taint. We are already lost in sin. There's only one way out.

This man, along with all Christians, has been led to believe this: that "whenever someone, even if it is myself, has a moment of good conscience, of generosity, or of something resembling altruism, it is because God is speaking to us". God is the only one who can make us do good. We can't do it by ourselves. This person is a truly Good Person, who has been indoctrinated into thinking that his good thoughts are God Speaking. His heart wanted to give me ten dollars, but his brain blamed it on God. I could never be angry at a person such as this.

I could also never be angry at a person like the cashier in the "You must be Christian" incident. The notion of Original Sin is ingrained to such a degree that it subconsciously underlies every thought.

I think it's things like this we fail to consider when we get all hotheaded about Christians "not getting it" when we explain to them about how "wrong" Christianity is. We get pissed off, annoyed, or disgusted when Christians hang onto their faith despite clear evidence they don't have a leg to stand on. Why? The concepts are painfully obvious and simple to grasp - for us. What gives? What gives is that we're not taking into account the fact that for Christians, its not as simple as a set of moral values, probabilities, and methods of thinking. It's not even as simple as Life and Death...it's far, far more important - according to what they've been led to believe.

Sure, many of you remember how you "never bought that God stuff from the beginning"; in fact, I remember reading in a thread that most atheists here became atheists at exceptionally young ages. Well good for you guys - but it should be obvious to you that it was so easy because, as a kid, you had absolutely no stake in Christianity. You hadn't been indoctrinated into the "understanding" that it was eternity that was really at stake...that the whole point of singing those songs and going to that boring place every Sunday was to save your soul.

Is it even a surprise, then, that Christians hang on to their faith even when they're no longer standing on solid ground? Is it even reasonable to expect a "gee, you're right...forget all this God stuff" from someone who's scared out of his mind at the thought of eternal hellfire?

I've not given up on attempting to introduce Christians to the truth through real critical thinking; but I absolutely refuse to get "angry" or "annoyed" when my arguments fall on (at least temporarily) deaf ears next to the prospect of Torture Until The End of Time If He's Wrong.
 
Fear is a powerful force... compounded by the fact that if you realize its any part of your reason for belief, you'd really be rather disgusted with myself.

I just plain left Christianity for a bit until I could be sure I wasn't believing out of fear. But it took awhile to get to the point where I was able to do that. But you're right on the temporary- some people will eventually come to realize the part fear is playing in their belief and see that its unacceptable for it to do so.
 
The guy helped me out, and hadn't pressured me into anything. Why was I getting angry at him?
He did pressure you into thinking long and hard about this church business. Maybe not intentionally, but you have obviously spent way more than $10 worth of your time on this, and maybe this has mad you angry.

Or maybe not.
 
There is a flip side to this, which is: how polite should you be, knowing how disrespectful Christians can be when the shoe is on the other foot. I personally make it a point to counter mentions of Christianity with a declaration about my atheism. I know it likely doesn't do any good, but if a few more people can say 'hey, I know an atheist, and he's a good guy', then maybe the world will be a slightly less nutty place, huh?
 
Joshua Korosi said:
I went to the Unitarian Church in Oberlin...you can all thank Upchurch for that.
Praise {Insert abstract Unitarian concept here}, Brother!
I've not given up on attempting to introduce Christians to the truth through real critical thinking; but I absolutely refuse to get "angry" or "annoyed" when my arguments fall on (at least temporarily) deaf ears next to the prospect of Torture Until The End of Time If He's Wrong.
Seriously, though, I think this is a very wise approach to arguing religion and/or philosophy with any opposing oppinion, Christian or otherwise. Granted, there isn't necessarily the same social engrainment (is that a word?) for other religion/philosophies that Christianity has, at least not in the US, but it doesn't mean the same argument doesn't apply.

I try to not let myself get personally angry or annoyed with those on this board that have different philosophical positions than myself. I don't always succeed, but it usually takes me a lot of running in circles before I lose it. Then, I try to divorce myself from the situation until I can reapproach the situation more rationally.

From a skeptic's point of view, it makes one wonder what properties of ourselves we attribute to outside forces rather than admitting or allowing that they come from us? Something to ponder, I suppose.
 
I agree that this "taint" of original sin is one of the most (if not the most) horrible concepts of Christianity. It is a debasing notion that should have no place in our world.

What's even more confusing is that Christians claim that Christ died on the cross to remove this taint, but they still rely on it to scare people into the faith.
 
So Joshua, where's the sawski? I hope you redirected it to the Unitarian offering basket.

Given its source, it might well burst into flames when it touches all that ungodly Unitarian gelt.
 
Ipecac said:
I agree that this "taint" of original sin is one of the most (if not the most) horrible concepts of Christianity. It is a debasing notion that should have no place in our world.

What's even more confusing is that Christians claim that Christ died on the cross to remove this taint, but they still rely on it to scare people into the faith.

Without original sin, the whole reason for having Jesus in the first place up and disapears.

Of course, it not just enough to have had him come and go, you have to BELIEVE in him to be saved :rolleyes:
 
Joshua Korosi said:
Another Long Post™ from yours truly!

Is it even a surprise, then, that Christians hang on to their faith even when they're no longer standing on solid ground? Is it even reasonable to expect a "gee, you're right...forget all this God stuff" from someone who's scared out of his mind at the thought of eternal hellfire?

I've not given up on attempting to introduce Christians to the truth through real critical thinking; but I absolutely refuse to get "angry" or "annoyed" when my arguments fall on (at least temporarily) deaf ears next to the prospect of Torture Until The End of Time If He's Wrong.

True, true. You've hit the nail on the head, JK. We sometimes forget that we are each the sum total of our experiences and many of us, as children, were molded from birth to follow a god that we could not see and to fear eternal damnation. It's difficult to overcome decades of that kind of programming. Many of us here have, but many more have not.

One question you may want to ask yourself is whether you think you'd still feel anger at your good samaritan, had he not professed his religious affiliations? Would you have felt any annoyance had he announced himself an atheist?

I think your approach for introducing truth through critical thinking to Christians is defined nicely. I try to set an example, rather than argue biblical fairy-tales vs scientific discovery. I can only hope that my friends and co-workers come to the realization that I'm a pretty good person ...for someone who is not a Christian. ;)
 
fishbob said:
He did pressure you into thinking long and hard about this church business. Maybe not intentionally, but you have obviously spent way more than $10 worth of your time on this, and maybe this has mad you angry.

Or maybe not.

Not thinking about the church business. I know that I wrote a whole lot, and it took a long time to write (and read) all that - but that's the odd thing about thought: it would only have taken a couple of minutes for all those concepts to rush through your head. In any case, any situation that gives me pause for thought in retrospect is no waste of time, I think.

Originally posted by Upchurch
Praise {Insert abstract Unitarian concept here}, Brother!

Glory be to {ibid}!

Originally posted by Kullervo
So Joshua, where's the sawski? I hope you redirected it to the Unitarian offering basket.

Given its source, it might well burst into flames when it touches all that ungodly Unitarian gelt.

[mode=proselytize]At our church, collection is taken only once a month. The entire amount of the collection is then donated (yes, donated) to a local charity or community service group. This month's collection happened last Sunday, so I can't redirect God's Wealth to the basket. I'll most likely spend it, and place a different ten-spot in the plate next month. [/mode]

Of course, that's a completely different theological discussion. Would God really like me for passing "His" wealth on, or would he rather it ended up in my gas tank, or at the local Subway? The bible is so unclear on this... :o

On another note; when I unfolded the Divinely Donated rolled-up bill and saw the printed face of Alexander Hamilton, for an instant - just an instant - I felt a twinge of horror at the prospect that Hal wasn't satisfied with his "JREF...and then the world!" mission, and had moved his battle to some higher realm.

Originally posted by Ladyhawk
One question you may want to ask yourself is whether you think you'd still feel anger at your good samaritan, had he not professed his religious affiliations? Would you have felt any annoyance had he announced himself an atheist?

Well wait...I didn't actually get angry at the guy, I'd only considered it. But I understand what you mean...and the answer is "of course not". The question that logically follows then is "Then why get upset at all?" There is no reason, so I no longer get upset.
 

Back
Top Bottom