Mojo
Mostly harmless
So what was meant to happen?11 January 2006 has a 666 signature:
1/11/06=111*6=666
Take note.
So what was meant to happen?11 January 2006 has a 666 signature:
1/11/06=111*6=666
Take note.
[Insert yesterday's news story X here] - THAT was it! Sharon/bird flu/Mark Oaten/Cat got stuck up a tree fits EXACTLY! Et cetera and so forth.So what was meant to happen?
This for example http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4601286.stmSo what was meant to happen?
This for example http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4601286.stm
And the next day another disaster http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4606002.stm
Every day there is a disaster.
Oh, Gawd. That means this thread is going to go on FOREVER...
No, no, no! That's not what will save it! It will be saved because the security services are taking love's warning so seriously that they will take undercover secret action to foil the dastardly attack, thus proving that love's prophecy was correct!No no. This thread need only go until 6/7/06, the day after my earnest and intense bursts of psychic energy have demonstrably saved the Sears Tower from extinction.
No, no, no! That's not what will save it! It will be saved because the security services are taking love's warning so seriously that they will take undercover secret action to foil the dastardly attack, thus proving that love's prophecy was correct!
Ladybrook.![]()
The proof that the attack will be thwarted by the secret security services will be that nobody will notice it happening. They're secret, you see.What kind of skeptic do you take me for? I will accept that only if there is proof that security services thwart an attack. Otherwise, I'm putting in for the million. I'm furrowing my brow as I type, concentrating beams of purple healing energy at the Sears Tower. Trust me on this.![]()
The proof that the attack will be thwarted by the secret security services will be that nobody will notice it happening. They're secret, you see.![]()
Incidentally, the "security services stopped my prediction coming true" argument was actually used here By Lucianarchy.