That took a second to decipher. The names threw me off I think. Thucydidies and Herodotus were not words I was expecting as I went along.whoneedspunctuationwhenherodotusandthucydideswro
tetheirgreatworkstherewasnosuchthingaspunctuationw
ordspacingorcapitalisationyoujustwroteastreamofletter
sacrossthepageandveryoftenitwasastheoxploughsiforon
eapplaudthisrestorationoftraditionalvalues
whoneedspunctuationwhenherodotusandthucydideswro
tetheirgreatworkstherewasnosuchthingaspunctuationw
ordspacingorcapitalisationyoujustwroteastreamofletter
sacrossthepageandveryoftenitwasastheoxploughsiforon
eapplaudthisrestorationoftraditionalvalues
-... ..- - .--. ..- -. -.-. - ..- .- - .. --- -. -.-. .- -. -... . ..-. ..- -. .-.-.-
Ever see the "Dear John" letters demonstrating how different punctuation can drastically change the meaning of text? I remember it from high school, it appears to be mostly annomous so I think I'm save posting it here. There are plenty of links on google for it, just search for "Dear John punctuation".Yes, I believe that is right and it is said that the original books of the new testament were written in this style. This implies that all the punctuation, sentence structures, paragraphing, verse numbering and chapter placements were added by later writers. I just thought I'd throw that in as something for skeptics to be skeptical about.
Dear John:
I want a man who knows what love is all about. You are generous, kind, thoughtful. People who are not like you admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me for other men. I yearn for you. I have no feelings whatsoever when we're apart. I can be forever happy--will you let me be yours?
Gloria
OR
Dear John:
I want a man who knows what love is. All about you are generous, kind, thoughtful people, who are not like you. Admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me. For other men, I yearn. For you, I have no feelings whatsoever. When we're apart, I can be forever happy. Will you let me be?
Yours, Gloria
As a result I was under the impression that there actually is a new standard for written work in education without punctuation.
Is there?!.
Then of course there is text messaging. Is that English? If so can children use it in exams?
I have mine here. He differentiates between abbreviations caused by dropping the end of the word (eg "bot." for botany) where the stop servers as a cue to the reader that it's a placeholder and those caused by removing some or all of the middle of the word. By not using the period here it cues the reader that the first and last letters of the abbreviation are also those of the parent word.He credits the advance of the uncluttered style to the advocacy of Fowler in Modern English Usage ( Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1926). I can't find my copy of Fowler just now, but that is right, as far as I remember.
There is a trend away from certain sorts of punctuation, in particular the hyphen. We hyphenate too much.
~~ Paul
Apparently, yes you can.Apprntly, Y U cn.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/bizarre/4327697.html
http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1936635,00.html
-.-- . ... .. .- -.. . . -.. .-.-.-