Foster Zygote
Dental Floss Tycoon
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,131
CQ... CQ... More to follow.
I was kind of hoping they would sneak an image down for the presser tonight. but the PR guy (at least) states the first batch of images will be tomorrow's press update.
As New Horizons Mission Operations Manager (MOM) and group supervisor of the Space Department’s Space Mission Operations Group, Alice Bowman’s most interesting days at work are the ones where the unexpected happens....
It is no longer a heart. It's what it was meant to be all along...
This is sort of interesting. I took a look at the site I linked to above which shows what satellites the Deep Space Network antennae are communicating with and right not it shows two antennae at Goldstone and two antennae in Australia sending data to the New Horizons space craft. There are many possibilities of what is going on, perhaps at the top of the list should be that I don't understand what I'm looking at and there is a mistake in the information displayed.
Perhaps there is more than one receiver on the New Horizons spacecraft? Rhere is a lot of redundancy. I looked around a bit and according to one source it sounds like the receiver can distinguish between left and right circular polarization signals and there are two receivers for redundancy. So does that explain why there might be four signals at once being sent to the new Horizons spacecraft. I'm not sure.
I'm surprised that transmitting from the much smaller antennae is worthwhile given how much larger the gain of the larger antennae is. If they can send data to the spacecraft with the much smaller antennae it suggests that they will be able to communicate with the spacecraft much farther away than it is now. And I suppose that's true because they can communicate with voyager and it is several times farther away than New Horizons is right now.
You need at least two places on earth to receive signals because some of the time the spacecraft is below the horizon in the same way that the sun is sometimes below the horizon.
I'm wondering if Pluto's inclination might account for at least some of its scarcity of craters.
They just said on the Nova special Chasing Pluto that Pluto may have collided with another Pluto-sized object. Pluto survived, and the other object broke up and formed the moons.Just wild speculation, but could the system have originally been one body, which was hit by something? That's how our moon was likely formed. If that happened, say, 100 ma, it would account for the youthful surface. The re-solidification could also account for some of the weird features, like the hummocky features on the right-hand side of the high-res Pluto image and the hills (water volcanoes?).
Someone with some tracing paper, a sharp pencil, and some spare time could do some seriously cool science with this, looking for stress ellipses.
I'd like to see a model/animation that shows moons, the likes of Charon, emanating from a collision. Anybody?They just said on the Nova special Chasing Pluto that Pluto may have collided with another Pluto-sized object. Pluto survived, and the other object broke up and formed the moons.