New Building 7 Video

Walter Ego

Illuminator
Walter Ego
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
3,377
Location
Dixie
This video raises an interesting question I hadn't thought of before: If WTC7 was a controlled demolition, why were 'bombs' going off in the morning in a building that didn't fall down until late in the same afternoon?

There's also a good quote from Chief Nigro and an interesting sound clip from the Democracy Now broadcast of 9/11/01.

 
Walter Ego said:
This video raises an interesting question I hadn't thought of before: If WTC7 was a controlled demolition, why were 'bombs' going off in the morning in a building that didn't fall down until late in the same afternoon?[/yt]
Click to expand...

At a guess, the same reason there were bombs going off in the WTC1 and 2 basements at the time the planes impacted. ;)

Who needs reason when you have da twoof?
 
Spud1k said:
At a guess, the same reason there were bombs going off in the WTC1 and 2 basements at the time the planes impacted. ;)
Click to expand...

You mean a top-down-controlled-demolition wouldn't benefit from basement bombs? PREPOSTEROUS! :mad::p
 
Nice video, by the way (just got home from work). It's casting my mind back to when the truthers were hammering it down our throats that the smoking gun proof that WTC7 had to be CD was because it was completely undamaged until it fell. Prove them wrong on that and they have to find a way of morphing their logic to fit.
 
That audio from the Democracy Now Interview is interesting. It would be nice to find out who that was and the whole interview. I will have to get out the googlejitsu and see what I find...
 
he video is a nice and consise adressing of a few of the issues concerning WTC 7.

Why indeed have explosives go off several hours before the building actually fell?
If the explosives went off prior to WTC 2 falling then why did no one near the building notice that?
If the explosives went off after WTC 2 fell but before WTC 1 fell, again, why did no one nearby notice that happen?
In fact the only one speaking of an explosion inside WTC 7 is Jennings who states that he had no knowledge of what was happening outside at the time he experienced that 'explosion'. Indeed he was, at the time, in the fire stairs and fire stairs have no windows.
Nice catch that Jennings has the order in which the towers fell wrong. I assume he knows which one fell first and is refering to 'the first tower to fal' and 'the second tower to fall' but his faux pas raises doubt as to the veracity of his history. At best he is just not that good a witness in that he does not consisely relate his experiences.

So we are left with the one other choice about when this anomalous 'explosion' occured. It coincided with the fall of one of the towers in which case Jennings testimony is no proof of explosives given that the collapse of a 110 storey building is quite likely to mimic an explosion in a nearby building when the witness has no knowledge of what is occuring beyond the walls of a fire stairwell.
 
Another point worth mentioning is that Jennings is not a truther and has gone on record accusing them of taking his comments out of context. All arguments of semantics aside, the whole thing is just yet another example of the truthers taking something that someone said and twisting it to argue the opposite of what they meant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom