• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New Book by Tammy Bruce

Jedi Knight

Banned
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
2,712
This is a chunk of Chapter 1 of Tammy Bruce's new book, "The Death of Right and Wrong: Exposing the Left's Assault on Our Culture and Values"

As quoted by Tammy Bruce: "The Left Elite has worked for years to brainwash us into a sort of values lobotomy. We are not to judge those who kill, if the guilty are people of color or women; we are to excuse those who destroy lives as victims of a racist, sexist, and homophobic world, or now, on the global scale, the unfair and oppressive “multinational corporate” world; we are to blame the innocent and lionize the guilty.

And if you dare to say you don’t believe injustice to be justice, then, as I demonstrated in The New Thought Police, you will be dismissed as sexist, racist, or homophobic. We have been led behind the Looking Glass, where everything is the opposite of what it should be.

How does the Left Elite indoctrinate decent, thoughtful people into accepting, as an example, that some killers are victims and deserve to be set free? Keep in mind, I speak of the Elite not necessarily as a cabal, but as a group of people who share certain basic assumptions, a certain world view. One now-accomplished goal is the brainwashing of society into believing that because of the color of their skin, or their gender, or their sexual preference, some in our “multicultural society” can never be understood by others, making judgment and punishment inappropriate. The corollaries are that traditional concepts of personal responsibility are outdated, and that expecting others to behave with dignity, and expecting society to recognize the concepts of right and wrong, is contrary to the ideal of liberty. Every idea, every act, has the same value--none is more worthy than another. Of course, this effort has to start with convincing you that the standards by which you were raised were wrong. Your ideas about religion, family, and sex are wrong, perhaps even harmful…

How best to change Americans’ fundamental values? How best to indoctrinate you into a culture that grows sicker and more corrupt by the minute? As I will discuss in more detail in the chapters that follow, the Left Elite uses every medium at its disposal--television, film, music, and art; politics and the justice system; higher education and the news media. One of its most important tools is constant special-interest-group rhetoric.

Keep in mind, the leftism I’m describing has nothing to do with the classical liberalism on which our country was founded--the political philosophy based on individual freedom. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. The Left has had to restrict individual freedom of thought and deed in order to destroy the concept of judgment and undermine notions of right and wrong that have been held nearly universally for millennia. This is the result of the wrong people getting control of our culture at a time when we were vulnerable. It’s that simple and that scary. It also can be reversed without having to diminish the benefits of liberty that flow naturally from our system and our hearts.

The Legacy of the Left

I’m an odd bird on today’s Left--I actually believe that we can embrace individual liberty while also applying some standard of dignity to the way we lead our lives. As a gay woman, I live a life made possible by the tolerance of the average American.

The efforts of activists in the 1960s to bring about an environment that would be safer for homosexual adults, and generally freer for all those who are minorities in our society, have been generally recognized as a good thing. Now, on the contrary, I see the Left demonizing the very idea of decency in their determination to lobotomize Americans into a foggy silence about anything cultural. In truth, being gay and living with decency and dignity are not exclusive concepts. But the Left has dirtied those words to such a degree that when I’ve used them in conversation they have elicited the same reaction as if I had suddenly uttered the word ◊◊◊◊◊◊. Friends have urged me not even to use the word morality because it was too “loaded.” All the more reason to dust it off!

You don’t, after all, need to be steeped in religious fundamentalism to realize things have gone terribly wrong. I personally refuse to be silent when a movement I’ve worked for, believing it was meant to expand tolerance and increase liberty, devolves into an effort to eliminate all value-based concepts.

For example, as a gay woman, I expect tolerance. But I understand that tolerance is not “acceptance” or “buy-in.” I don’t expect other women to run out and become lesbians just because they tolerate me, or even if they like me or admire the stands I have taken. A fundamentalist Christian may think my lifestyle is wrong, but it’s not by fundamentalist Christians that I have been attacked and demonized over the last seven years.

A good example of the difference between today’s Right and today’s Left can be seen in their reaction to murder. People on the Right, no matter how strongly opposed to abortion they are, nearly all recognize that anti-abortion activists who kill doctors are wrong. Contrast that with the Left’s lionization of black men who kill whites, and especially white police officers.

The noble effort in the 1960s to encourage individuality apparently had no braking mechanism. It continued to a point where self-gratification became the goal, at the expense of values that could co-exist with and even enhance our new-found sense of our individuality and sexual self-awareness. Faith, family, fidelity, truth, and honor all became casualties of America’s Cultural Elite. Tolerance, once a genuine American ideal, has become a code word for moral relativism and all its side-effects. Once it was realized that the American people were willing to accept diversity and even some challenge to the status quo, the Left’s goal changed from extending the boundaries of what was considered right, to having no boundaries at all. Moral relativism became the order of the day--a view that moral standards are entirely grounded in social custom, varying from culture to culture, moment to moment, circumstance to circumstance...

The death of right and wrong …may be more easily seen by taking a look at the core of our culture--the art world. The disintegration of our culture, and the conditioning of people into accepting it in silence, begins with legitimizing the depraved. This requires a trip to San Francisco…."
--endquote.

Wow, that is powerful stuff, and almost sounds like the observations that I make about the radical left. I am pleased that I am not the only one who sees what is going wrong inside our country and beyond.

Jedi Knight
 
Jedi Knight said:
This is a chunk of Chapter 1 of Tammy Bruce's new book, "The Death of Right and Wrong: Exposing the Left's Assault on Our Culture and Values"

As quoted by Tammy Bruce: "The Left Elite has worked for years to brainwash us into a sort of values lobotomy. We are not to judge those who kill, if the guilty are people of color or women; we are to excuse those who destroy lives as victims of a racist, sexist, and homophobic world, or now, on the global scale, the unfair and oppressive “multinational corporate” world; we are to blame the innocent and lionize the guilty.

And if you dare to say you don’t believe injustice to be justice, then, as I demonstrated in The New Thought Police, you will be dismissed as sexist, racist, or homophobic. We have been led behind the Looking Glass, where everything is the opposite of what it should be.

How does the Left Elite indoctrinate decent, thoughtful people into accepting, as an example, that some killers are victims and deserve to be set free? Keep in mind, I speak of the Elite not necessarily as a cabal, but as a group of people who share certain basic assumptions, a certain world view. One now-accomplished goal is the brainwashing of society into believing that because of the color of their skin, or their gender, or their sexual preference, some in our “multicultural society” can never be understood by others, making judgment and punishment inappropriate. The corollaries are that traditional concepts of personal responsibility are outdated, and that expecting others to behave with dignity, and expecting society to recognize the concepts of right and wrong, is contrary to the ideal of liberty. Every idea, every act, has the same value--none is more worthy than another. Of course, this effort has to start with convincing you that the standards by which you were raised were wrong. Your ideas about religion, family, and sex are wrong, perhaps even harmful…

How best to change Americans’ fundamental values? How best to indoctrinate you into a culture that grows sicker and more corrupt by the minute? As I will discuss in more detail in the chapters that follow, the Left Elite uses every medium at its disposal--television, film, music, and art; politics and the justice system; higher education and the news media. One of its most important tools is constant special-interest-group rhetoric.

Keep in mind, the leftism I’m describing has nothing to do with the classical liberalism on which our country was founded--the political philosophy based on individual freedom. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. The Left has had to restrict individual freedom of thought and deed in order to destroy the concept of judgment and undermine notions of right and wrong that have been held nearly universally for millennia. This is the result of the wrong people getting control of our culture at a time when we were vulnerable. It’s that simple and that scary. It also can be reversed without having to diminish the benefits of liberty that flow naturally from our system and our hearts.

The Legacy of the Left

I’m an odd bird on today’s Left--I actually believe that we can embrace individual liberty while also applying some standard of dignity to the way we lead our lives. As a gay woman, I live a life made possible by the tolerance of the average American.

The efforts of activists in the 1960s to bring about an environment that would be safer for homosexual adults, and generally freer for all those who are minorities in our society, have been generally recognized as a good thing. Now, on the contrary, I see the Left demonizing the very idea of decency in their determination to lobotomize Americans into a foggy silence about anything cultural. In truth, being gay and living with decency and dignity are not exclusive concepts. But the Left has dirtied those words to such a degree that when I’ve used them in conversation they have elicited the same reaction as if I had suddenly uttered the word ◊◊◊◊◊◊. Friends have urged me not even to use the word morality because it was too “loaded.” All the more reason to dust it off!

You don’t, after all, need to be steeped in religious fundamentalism to realize things have gone terribly wrong. I personally refuse to be silent when a movement I’ve worked for, believing it was meant to expand tolerance and increase liberty, devolves into an effort to eliminate all value-based concepts.

For example, as a gay woman, I expect tolerance. But I understand that tolerance is not “acceptance” or “buy-in.” I don’t expect other women to run out and become lesbians just because they tolerate me, or even if they like me or admire the stands I have taken. A fundamentalist Christian may think my lifestyle is wrong, but it’s not by fundamentalist Christians that I have been attacked and demonized over the last seven years.

A good example of the difference between today’s Right and today’s Left can be seen in their reaction to murder. People on the Right, no matter how strongly opposed to abortion they are, nearly all recognize that anti-abortion activists who kill doctors are wrong. Contrast that with the Left’s lionization of black men who kill whites, and especially white police officers.

The noble effort in the 1960s to encourage individuality apparently had no braking mechanism. It continued to a point where self-gratification became the goal, at the expense of values that could co-exist with and even enhance our new-found sense of our individuality and sexual self-awareness. Faith, family, fidelity, truth, and honor all became casualties of America’s Cultural Elite. Tolerance, once a genuine American ideal, has become a code word for moral relativism and all its side-effects. Once it was realized that the American people were willing to accept diversity and even some challenge to the status quo, the Left’s goal changed from extending the boundaries of what was considered right, to having no boundaries at all. Moral relativism became the order of the day--a view that moral standards are entirely grounded in social custom, varying from culture to culture, moment to moment, circumstance to circumstance...

The death of right and wrong …may be more easily seen by taking a look at the core of our culture--the art world. The disintegration of our culture, and the conditioning of people into accepting it in silence, begins with legitimizing the depraved. This requires a trip to San Francisco…."
--endquote.

Wow, that is powerful stuff, and almost sounds like the observations that I make about the radical left. I am pleased that I am not the only one who sees what is going wrong inside our country and beyond.

Jedi Knight

BS
 
Jedi Knight said:


It is awesome writing by an awesome conservative, Q. What parts do you disagree with?

JK

I would answer your question, but you asked me not to talk to you again... :cool:
 
's response

Jon_in_london said:


An astute analysis, deconstruction and rebuttal!!!

:rolleyes:

Q's response is typical. She can't say why she disagrees because that just opens the door for more debate. No, rather she will just say "BS", and hope the leftist legions will pile on and support her without providing further information (you know, groupthink, a critical left-wing condition of solidarity to untruths).

JK
 
Q-Source said:


I would answer your question, but you asked me not to talk to you again... :cool:

Then why did you bother posting in my thread? One keystroke made in my thread is replying to me. Or was your "BS" reply simply a hasty definition of everything you believe innerly?

JK
 
Jedi Knight said:


Q's response is typical. She can't say why she disagrees because that just opens the door for more debate. No, rather she will just say "BS", and hope the leftist legions will pile on and support her without providing further information (you know, groupthink, a critical left-wing condition of solidarity to untruths).



Oh, no.

You know I LOVE to debate

I have tried to have rational and adult debates with you sometimes, but it is rather strange that you ALWAYS abandon or ignore my posts when we start discussing topics seriously, especially in those threads about Feminism.

I have records of all them...

Q

BTW, This is a JREF's message board. Starting a thread does not imply that it belongs to you or that I cannot post on them just because you asked me not to talk to you again. :rolleyes:
 
ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH red fonts have mercy on my dyslexia please now I am suffering bad jumpy words:(
 
Who exactly is this radical Left that is celebrating cop killers, etc? I realize this is just an introduction to her book, but some concrete examples would be nice. I just don't see the death of right and wrong - you have a conservative president who has definite notions of right and wrong.

Really, the "Left" as described here seems just as shadowy as any conspiracy theory about some "military-industrial complex" who really run our lives.

The problem is not the "Left" - it is the death of personal responsibility in general. I don't think that this can all be laid at the feet of the "Left". Turn on the tv any day and on any talk show people are whining about their lives, seeking attention, but not actually doing anything about the situations they create. I don't think it is a right or left issue.
 
So far there are two people who abscribe to the JK view of American Politics.

Well, that is at least one person more than those who abscribe to JK views of physics and cosmology.

In any event, JK needs to understand the Forum rules regarding ownership; the threads he starts are not his personal property.

The JREF is a privately owned and operated organization.
-As a result, it must manage the forum for the greater benefit of the JREF. Any and all decisions made by the forum Administrator may be appealed first to Linda and then (if desired) to Mr. Randi. In all cases, they shall have the final and complete say on any forum management issue.
 
Biker Babe said:
ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH red fonts have mercy on my dyslexia please now I am suffering bad jumpy words:(

If you have a problem with red fonts, you can highlight it to read it.
 
Q-Source said:



Oh, no.

You know I LOVE to debate

I have tried to have rational and adult debates with you sometimes, but it is rather strange that you ALWAYS abandon or ignore my posts when we start discussing topics seriously, especially in those threads about Feminism.

I have records of all them...

Q

BTW, This is a JREF's message board. Starting a thread does not imply that it belongs to you or that I cannot post on them just because you asked me not to talk to you again. :rolleyes:

I have annihilated every leftist idea you ever came up with Q. So tell me, what is wrong with Tammy's accurate intro in her new book?

You know, if Tammy wasn't a homosexual, I would ask her out to a date. I like how that chick thinks.

JK
 
Crossbow said:
So far there are two people who abscribe to the JK view of American Politics.

Well, that is at least one person more than those who abscribe to JK views of physics and cosmology.

In any event, JK needs to understand the Forum rules regarding ownership; the threads he starts are not his personal property.

The JREF is a privately owned and operated organization.
-As a result, it must manage the forum for the greater benefit of the JREF. Any and all decisions made by the forum Administrator may be appealed first to Linda and then (if desired) to Mr. Randi. In all cases, they shall have the final and complete say on any forum management issue.

Yes, yes, I can feel your anger...you are slowly falling towards the dark side.

JK
 
Great article JK,

Thanks for sharing. It seems to go right to the heart of the debate I had with Vic over on the "where's the chemical weapons" thread.

The world according to the left seems like a valueless place in which no foreign policy decision, no matter how well thought out, can be taken because we get our morality through our culture...and therefore our decisions can never be "right" according to any culture not our own. If this were our guiding principle then a foreign policy paralysis would be the only possible result. IMHO, just what the organizers behind WWP and ANSWER are angling for. :(

-z
 
rikzilla said:
Great article JK,

Thanks for sharing. It seems to go right to the heart of the debate I had with Vic over on the "where's the chemical weapons" thread.

The world according to the left seems like a valueless place in which no foreign policy decision, no matter how well thought out, can be taken because we get our morality through our culture...and therefore our decisions can never be "right" according to any culture not our own. If this were our guiding principle then a foreign policy paralysis would be the only possible result. IMHO, just what the organizers behind WWP and ANSWER are angling for. :(

-z

I had to quote Tammy's new book because there is a movement on in this forum by leftists to say that my "views" are solely my own and not shared by others. As you can see, not only does Tammy share my views, she writes about them to make money.

Hmmm....imagine a political text by Jedi lol.

JK
 
Jedi,

If you do requests, could you explain just what this "left" is that you decry? Not just what they do, but who they are. It seems to me at this point that you use the word simply to define things you do not like, as a synonymn for "jerk" or something of that nature.

Despite the dramatic and combative way you express yourself I do have sort of a feel for what you are trying to express, and I am not completely unsympathetic. You remind me of one of my old Political Science professors. You just have an unfortunate habit of slipping into sensationalistic absurdity (i.e. no such thing as an battered woman), and that has damaged your credibility. Just calm down, and quit using the word "left" as an unexplained slur, and you may be able to spend more time on the rational basis of your views than in a flame match with those that are at this point simply hostile to anything you have to say.

I was impressed by your post in the editorial thread regarding multicuturalism and the middle east. I don't necessarily agree with all of it, but those that responded with garbage definately lost some respect from me (not that they would care).

Don't let the bastards get you down.
 
Thanz said:
Who exactly is this radical Left that is celebrating cop killers, etc?
I want to know about this "values lobotomy" thingy. That might come in handy sometimes.
 
She has unfortunately fallen into blaming a very large group "the left" and painting them all into the same positions.

Not every left-leaning persons supports cop-killers of course. If you did a survey, my guess is you would find most people have no sympathy for a black man who kills a white cop.

Unless her book has good statistics showing that the occasional radical liberal has significantly altered public viewpoint about such things, then her arguements have no basis except her own "perception of how things are".
 

Back
Top Bottom