• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Multiculturalism rocks!

Xenophobic? Racist? Possibly so, he's certainly made statements that could arguably qualify as such, but I haven't read up on my Clippy-trivia to really comment encompassively on the whole or perhaps the bone of it. I care little of doing so.

So although you wouldn’t “necessarily call restrictive or even rejective sentiments toward 'multiculturalism' as xenophobic, or nonsensical, or racist” (you and I would seem to be in agreement there), You would “possibly” “arguably qualify” Clippy’s position (as expounded by Clippy) as being “xenophobic, or nonsensical, or racist”, where you, I and GreyArea would all seem to be in agreement there.
 
You would “possibly” “arguably qualify” Clippy’s position (as expounded by Clippy) as being “xenophobic, or nonsensical, or racist”, where you, I and GreyArea would all seem to be in agreement there.

Yes but we may or may not be, concerning the topic. I think that I, GreyArea and you might very well have quite different ideas of pro's and con's concerning 'multiculturalism' or specific aspects thereof. I do not think Clippy, despite his convictions, elaborated enough if he had hoped to come across coherently. Or, perhaps, he simply has little to elaborate on/from.

I wonder where he went off to.
 
Yes but we may or may not be, concerning the topic. I think that I, GreyArea and you might very well have quite different ideas of pro's and con's concerning 'multiculturalism' or specific aspects thereof. I do not think Clippy, despite his convictions, elaborated enough if he had hoped to come across coherently. Or, perhaps, he simply has little to elaborate on/from.

I wonder where he went off to.

I expect that we might have quite different and in some cases quite similar ideas about those pro’s and con’s concerning 'multiculturalism' or specific aspects thereof. It is also possible that the more Clippy might have elaborated his position, at least as it has been presented so far, the less coherent it may actual have become.
 
I expect that we might have quite different and in some cases quite similar ideas about those pro’s and con’s concerning 'multiculturalism' or specific aspects thereof. It is also possible that the more Clippy might have elaborated his position, at least as it has been presented so far, the less coherent it may actual have become.
I see what you did thar... Calling him out, no? Cunning, har har.

Your statement is merely extrapolative speculation, though... :(
 
It is also possible that the more Clippy might have elaborated his position, at least as it has been presented so far, the less coherent it may actual have become.

Yes that is possible, hence my comment; "Or, perhaps, he simply has little to elaborate on/from."

Again, I wonder where he went off to, as it is a perfectly discussable topic as any other really.
 

Actually, yes, yes we are allowed to say "epic fail of a post" here. Doesn't come under any of the rules to say it, no mod cards here on it, is not attacking the poster rather than the post. And seems to be the opinion of most of the posters.
Have a nice multicultural day!!:)
 
Yes that is possible, hence my comment; "Or, perhaps, he simply has little to elaborate on/from."

Again, I wonder where he went off to, as it is a perfectly discussable topic as any other really.


No posts on this forum since the last one on this thread.
 
While I'm not sure, it sounds like he's referring to of discussed "white flight" thingy.

Yes, I was referring to White flight.

My position on multiculturalism is that it is a distraction. It is only dealing with symptoms. People think by talking about it they can avoid the subject of race (or ethnicity). Racism is an illegitimate term, promoted by Jewish Bolsheviks. 99.99999% of what is called 'racism' is normal behaviour and does not require any label.

White people should have been asked whether they wanted their nations to be transformed. They weren't asked. If the numbers were small, it would not be a problem for the majority of White people. Third World immigration and ethnic cleansing (White flight) will continue, however, because Jews and capitalists favour it. Unless Arcade22 understands the Jewish angle, he will never know why Skeptic attacks him (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5440911&postcount=153).
 
Yes, I was referring to White flight.

My position on multiculturalism is that it is a distraction. It is only dealing with symptoms. People think by talking about it they can avoid the subject of race (or ethnicity). Racism is an illegitimate term, promoted by Jewish Bolsheviks. 99.99999% of what is called 'racism' is normal behaviour and does not require any label.

White people should have been asked whether they wanted their nations to be transformed. They weren't asked. If the numbers were small, it would not be a problem for the majority of White people. Third World immigration and ethnic cleansing (White flight) will continue, however, because Jews and capitalists favour it. Unless Arcade22 understands the Jewish angle, he will never know why Skeptic attacks him (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5440911&postcount=153).
@WhiteLion and The Man.

Does this racist, anti-Semitic and paranoid conspiracy addled nonsense answer your question?
 
Yes, I was referring to White flight.

My position on multiculturalism is that it is a distraction. It is only dealing with symptoms. People think by talking about it they can avoid the subject of race (or ethnicity). Racism is an illegitimate term, promoted by Jewish Bolsheviks. 99.99999% of what is called 'racism' is normal behaviour and does not require any label.

White people should have been asked whether they wanted their nations to be transformed. They weren't asked. If the numbers were small, it would not be a problem for the majority of White people. Third World immigration and ethnic cleansing (White flight) will continue, however, because Jews and capitalists favour it. Unless Arcade22 understands the Jewish angle, he will never know why Skeptic attacks him (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5440911&postcount=153).

How so?
 
What every patriot who has his peoples well being at heart should do.

Being taxed and controlled by the same group of incompetent bureaucrats should not be a source of pride or unity.

Why should I care more about some random person I don't know who lives inside the same arbitary border within which I reside than I care about some random person I don't know who lives within some arbitrary border outside of within which I do not reside?
 
@WhiteLion and The Man.

Does this racist, anti-Semitic and paranoid conspiracy addled nonsense answer your question?


Not sure what question of mine you might be referring to, certainly "racist, anti-Semitic and paranoid conspiracy addled nonsense" was not in question for me based on Clippy's previous posts on this thread.
 
Yes, I was referring to White flight.

My position on multiculturalism is that it is a distraction. It is only dealing with symptoms. People think by talking about it they can avoid the subject of race (or ethnicity). Racism is an illegitimate term, promoted by Jewish Bolsheviks. 99.99999% of what is called 'racism' is normal behaviour and does not require any label.

So you claim it “does not require any label”, but you give it one anyway and label it as “normal behaviour”?


White people should have been asked whether they wanted their nations to be transformed. They weren't asked. If the numbers were small, it would not be a problem for the majority of White people. Third World immigration and ethnic cleansing (White flight) will continue, however, because Jews and capitalists favour it. Unless Arcade22 understands the Jewish angle, he will never know why Skeptic attacks him (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5440911&postcount=153).

What, so Native American, Aboriginal and African peoples should not have been asked “whether they wanted their nations to be transformed”? Isn’t that just part of your “normal behaviour”?
 
White people should have been asked whether they wanted their nations to be transformed. They weren't asked.

You were asked. Your laws allow immigration and freedom of reproduction.

BTW, why "white people"? Should non-white people be able to ask too?
 
So you claim it “does not require any label”, but you give it one anyway and label it as “normal behaviour”?

Wow, you're clever.

What, so Native American, Aboriginal and African peoples should not have been asked “whether they wanted their nations to be transformed”? Isn’t that just part of your “normal behaviour”?

Native Americans had every right to resist their dispossession. That's normal behaviour.
 

Back
Top Bottom