Oleron
Muse
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2004
- Messages
- 940
I regularly watch a UK 'Living TV' show called 'Most Haunted'. Don't ask me why - I can't figure it out either.
It's a rehash of the tired old format of ghost hunting programs but done in an upbeat sort of way, involving psychics, sceances and lots of orbs.
They periodically do a 'Live' show where they fill the audience with the public (with quite a few amateur 'sensitive types') and invite Matthew Smith as the voice of the skeptics.
I have seen Matthew Smith on several shows before and he is a parapsychologist - quite open-minded but fundamentally skeptical.
Each time something odd happens (orbs, funny noise, etc) the host turns to Matthew in a kind of 'Well how do explain that one?' tone of voice.
Matthew is very patient and tries to present alternative explanations but the show quickly descends into a skeptic bashing exercise where the poor mans views are openly laughed at!
The general public, as represented by the studio audience, seem to get a great kick out of this.
I can understand that the public don't like scepticism because de-bunking ruins the story, but the level of antagonism shown towards Matthew surprised me.
I wonder how people would react to the opposite? For example a show with a room full of skeptics disregarding manners and 'intellectually bullying' a lone psychic.
It's a rehash of the tired old format of ghost hunting programs but done in an upbeat sort of way, involving psychics, sceances and lots of orbs.
They periodically do a 'Live' show where they fill the audience with the public (with quite a few amateur 'sensitive types') and invite Matthew Smith as the voice of the skeptics.
I have seen Matthew Smith on several shows before and he is a parapsychologist - quite open-minded but fundamentally skeptical.
Each time something odd happens (orbs, funny noise, etc) the host turns to Matthew in a kind of 'Well how do explain that one?' tone of voice.
Matthew is very patient and tries to present alternative explanations but the show quickly descends into a skeptic bashing exercise where the poor mans views are openly laughed at!
The general public, as represented by the studio audience, seem to get a great kick out of this.
I can understand that the public don't like scepticism because de-bunking ruins the story, but the level of antagonism shown towards Matthew surprised me.
I wonder how people would react to the opposite? For example a show with a room full of skeptics disregarding manners and 'intellectually bullying' a lone psychic.