Mission Accomplished +3

headscratcher4

Philosopher
Joined
Apr 14, 2002
Messages
7,776
Today, the third anniversary of the President's moving "Mission Accomplished" speech on an Aircraft carrier, reminds us how much has been accomplished in so short a period of time.

Iraq, finally, is at peace. The horrors of war have been banished from that land. Its oil production has surpassed even the President's wildest expectations and, using its vast resources, it has not only helped pay for its liberation by the Coalition of the Willing, it has taken on most of the internal rebuilding efforts. Hospitals and schools are going up at a heretofore unprecedented rate. International business in Bagdad has flourished, with it becoming a second Dubai in terms of free-markets.

Fortunately, the dramatic reduction in both American casualties along with the stabilization of the country and the reconstitution and deployment of a new Iraqi security force, has enabled the U.S. to withdraw many of its troops, lessening global tensions while underscoring both how well planned the U.S. occupation was, and the United States' best face to the beleaguered Arab world.

Better still, the flourishing democracy and stable, democratically elected government, free press and separation of church and state that has emerged in Iraq since the U.S. occupation, has inspired the dramatic transformation of formerly dictatorial Arab regimes into stable, democratic regimes that respect human rights.

And, least we forget, the capture of Osama Bin Ladin and the destruction of the agents of AlQeda in Iraq has contributed mightily to increased global stability. Indeed, the Administration's ploy of fighting the terrorists in Iraq rather than here at home seems to have worked masterfully. Who would have thought that wrapping up the global terrorist network and bringing its leaders to trial would have been so easily executed.

Further, and fortunately, the fact that we were able to so-quickly wrap up the occupation in Iraq, has meant that our armed-forces were subsequently able to show proper will against the renegade regime in Iran. Fortunately, no longer having to be pinned-down in Iraq, our military could back-up our diplomatic efforts with the threat of a devastating response should Iran ignore the will of the international community.

Oh, and need we say what a masterful job of tying the international community together, this Administration has accomplished since the Mission Accomplished speech. The swelling of the participants in the Coalition of the willing was, of course, expected, but to happen so quickly? I never would have thought it. The countries lining up to join in the transformation of Iraq -- and than to stand firm against Iran's nuclear ambition -- well, it has changed the world.

Here, I was initially concerned that the Administration's cow-boy, go it alone international attitude would alienate allies and potential allies alike, leaving the US to look like a renegade power in the fast of mounting international doubt about our motives and capabilities. Needless to say, boy do I have egg on my face!

Mission accomplished. It was stirring moment three years ago that continues to inspire.

God bless America. God Bless George Bush and the stellar team he assembled to take down Saddam Hussein and his close friend and ally Osama Bin Ladin.

More importantly, God Bless George Bush's steely resolve for ignoring the nay-sayers, the evidence and history.

Mission Accomplished! It is a great day, a new birth-of freedom in America and across the globe.
 
Last edited:
Because of people like you and the liberal media, we'll lose the war on the homefront and embolden the enemy and you will have caused the fulfillment of your prediction of civil war in Iraq and all because you have a pathological hatred of Dear Leader.
 
Why do you hate America?

Let me remind you of some of what our President said lo' just three years ago:

"The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 -- and still goes on. That terrible morning, 19 evil men -- the shock troops of a hateful ideology -- gave America and the civilized world a glimpse of their ambitions. They imagined, in the words of one terrorist, that September the 11th would be the "beginning of the end of America." By seeking to turn our cities into killing fields, terrorists and their allies believed that they could destroy this nation's resolve, and force our retreat from the world. They have failed. (Applause.)
In the battle of Afghanistan, we destroyed the Taliban, many terrorists, and the camps where they trained. We continue to help the Afghan people lay roads, restore hospitals, and educate all of their children. Yet we also have dangerous work to complete. As I speak, a Special Operations task force, led by the 82nd Airborne, is on the trail of the terrorists and those who seek to undermine the free government of Afghanistan. America and our coalition will finish what we have begun. (Applause.)
From Pakistan to the Philippines to the Horn of Africa, we are hunting down al Qaeda killers. Nineteen months ago, I pledged that the terrorists would not escape the patient justice of the United States. And as of tonight, nearly one-half of al Qaeda's senior operatives have been captured or killed. (Applause.)
The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We've removed an ally of al Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding. And this much is certain: No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime, because the regime is no more. (Applause.)
In these 19 months that changed the world, our actions have been focused and deliberate and proportionate to the offense. We have not forgotten the victims of September the 11th -- the last phone calls, the cold murder of children, the searches in the rubble. With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got. (Applause.)"

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030501-15.html

The war is over. Bush has won. Ther rest is mere details of history.
 
The war is over. Bush has won. Ther rest is mere details of history.

Strange, but I didn't get that message from the quote you posted at all. I've also searched in vain for any argument in your post to agree or disagree with. Do you even have a point?
 
Strange, but I didn't get that message from the quote you posted at all. I've also searched in vain for any argument in your post to agree or disagree with. Do you even have a point?

No, much like the president, my pointlessness is my strength.
 
I prefer Stephen Colbert's take: "Misery Accomplished" ....

Charlie (give up your rights for political gain and win valuable prizes) Monoxide
 
Wow. I didn't realize today was the Moronic Convergence. Let's rewind the actual text of the speech a bit:

We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous. We're pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime, who will be held to account for their crimes. We've begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons and already know of hundreds of sites that will be investigated. We're helping to rebuild Iraq, where the dictator built palaces for himself, instead of hospitals and schools. And we will stand with the new leaders of Iraq as they establish a government of, by, and for the Iraqi people. (Applause.)

The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done. Then we will leave, and we will leave behind a free Iraq.

Those are the two paragraphs immediately preceding the quoted text. Funny how they never seem to make the cut.
 
Wow. I didn't realize today was the Moronic Convergence. Let's rewind the actual text of the speech a bit:



Those are the two paragraphs immediately preceding the quoted text. Funny how they never seem to make the cut.


Your confidence in the President's vision inspires me. I am particularly hopeful that the following: "We've begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons and already know of hundreds of sites that will be investigated..." will still yield the cause needed to justify the war, as it was used to justify the war.

Also, "We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous." -- you are right, I shouldn't have left that out. It supports the whole mission accomplished vision thing. Don't let the fact that last month was possibly the highest month for US casualties in the three years since Mission Accomplished. So, I guess we're making progress on the ground right in line with the President's vision (and, I note, Rice and Rumsfeld were able to secretely fly into the country last week, fortunately, it was kept secret till they were inside the green zone, otherwise the public adulation at their liberation would have inspired a massive street party that would have detracted from the ongoing effort to rebuild the nation with the massive oil revenues that have been brought on-line since the liberation).

Yes, those two paragraphs do indeed undercut any cynical appraisal of the President's Mission Accomplished statement.

Mission Accomplished game over.
 
Wow. I didn't realize today was the Moronic Convergence. Let's rewind the actual text of the speech a bit:



Those are the two paragraphs immediately preceding the quoted text. Funny how they never seem to make the cut.
May 1, 2003: US Troops wounded = 542; killed = 139
May 1, 2006: US Troops wounded = 17,469; killed = 2,400

Moronic convergence: defenders of Bush's Mission Accomplished Stunt gather on message boards all over the Internet to shore up Dear Leader against criticism for going to war when he didn't have any idea how to go about it.
 
Talk about moronic convergence: here is part of the transcript from today's WH Briefing...

Reporter: Scott, given the current situation in Iraq, what the president described today as havoc ... could he, would he, possibly stand under a sign that says "Mission Accomplished" today, as he did three years ago?

McClellan: Well, I think that there are some Democrats that refuse to recognize the important milestone achieved by the formation of a national unity government. And there's an effort simply to distract attention away from the real progress that is being made by misrepresenting and distorting the past. And that really does nothing to help advance our goal of achieving victory in Iraq.

Reporter: So, Scott, simply yes-or-no ... could the president stand under a sign today …

McClellan: No, see, this is a way that ...

Reporter: This has nothing to do with Democrats. I'm asking you ...

McClellan: Sure it does.

Reporter: … based on reporter's curiosity: Could he stand under a sign again that says "Mission Accomplished"?

McClellan: Democrats have tried to raise this issue. And like I said, misrepresenting and distorting the past, which is what they are doing, does nothing to advance the goal of victory in Iraq.

Reporter: I mean, it's a historical fact that, you know, we're all taking note of ...

McClellan: Well, I think the focus ought to be on achieving victory in Iraq and the progress that's being made. And that's where it is. And you know exactly that Democrats are trying to distort the past.

Reporter: Let me ask it another way: Has the mission been accomplished?

McClellan: Next question.

Reporter: Has the mission been accomplished?

McClellan: We are on the way to accomplishing the mission and achieving victory.
 
Don't let the fact that last month was possibly the highest month for US casualties in the three years since Mission Accomplished.

No, it wasn't. Not close. The two top months for casualties since the initial invasion, by a good margin, are April and November of 2004, the former being the first aborted assault on Fallujah plus the squashing of Sadr's Mahdi army, the later being the second assault on Fallujah where we actually took the city. And that applies to both the number killed AND the number wounded.

http://icasualties.org/oif/woundedchart.aspx
http://icasualties.org/oif/US_chart.aspx

I don't know where you got that information (assuming you didn't make it up), but it's wrong. You might want to consider re-evaluating any other information you got from those sources, too.
 
No, it wasn't. Not close. The two top months for casualties since the initial invasion, by a good margin, are April and November of 2004, the former being the first aborted assault on Fallujah plus the squashing of Sadr's Mahdi army, the later being the second assault on Fallujah where we actually took the city. And that applies to both the number killed AND the number wounded.

http://icasualties.org/oif/woundedchart.aspx
http://icasualties.org/oif/US_chart.aspx

I don't know where you got that information (assuming you didn't make it up), but it's wrong. You might want to consider re-evaluating any other information you got from those sources, too.

You are correct. I mistated the facts. My bad. Even in my sorry try for humor, I should be more mindful of the facts. I won't promise that I will always succeed, but I do apologize.

As I understand it, April was the deadliest month for US soldiers this year.

http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/04/28/ap2707238.html

Anyway, I am sure it all means that things are that much better, right on schedule and the Administration's plan is working...all part of accomplishing the mission.
 
Scott, why did the chicken cross the road?

The Democrats made him do it.

Unless crossing the road was a good thing, then it was a result---against all odds!---of saintly Republicans overcoming the dark cabal of the liberal media, Hollywood, and evil academics trying to impede the poor chicken's god promised progress.
 
As I understand it, April was the deadliest month for US soldiers this year.

Yes, that is correct. One possible explanation I've seen is that during the first three months of the year, coalition forces scaled back their offensive operations to wait for the political process (the elections and the formation of a new government) to play out. That turned out to take far longer than it should have, and so US forces resumed their earlier pace of offensive operations in April. More offensive operations means more casualties, even things are improving.
 
Yes, that is correct. One possible explanation I've seen is that during the first three months of the year, coalition forces scaled back their offensive operations to wait for the political process (the elections and the formation of a new government) to play out. That turned out to take far longer than it should have, and so US forces resumed their earlier pace of offensive operations in April. More offensive operations means more casualties, even things are improving.

If a Democrat wins the White House next time (unlikely, I grant you) I can't wait to see how you guys start evaluating the war then.
 
If a Democrat wins the White House next time (unlikely, I grant you) I can't wait to see how you guys start evaluating the war then.

Your bias is showing, Mark. You don't even know who I wanted to win in 2004.
 
Yes, that is correct. One possible explanation I've seen is that during the first three months of the year, coalition forces scaled back their offensive operations to wait for the political process (the elections and the formation of a new government) to play out. That turned out to take far longer than it should have, and so US forces resumed their earlier pace of offensive operations in April. More offensive operations means more casualties, even things are improving.

Well, that makes it ok. Thanks. I'm glad to know there was a plan behind the spike and it was expected. My faith in the mission has been restored. My faith in the people setting policy here has been restored. I now admit that I have been completely wrong.

The Mission has been accomplished. THe mission continues to be accomplished. THe mission will be accomplished as far into the future as anyone would care to look.

I like other Americans polled are wrong. The nation is on the right course. We've got the right leadership with the right vision.

Thank you for clarifying for me. :)
 

Back
Top Bottom