• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Missing our Troofs

One related question, how are the other 9/11 forum sites going? Are they suffering or is it just us? If it is just us then this forum has problems. If it is everyone then it is a victory for critical thinking.

The only two I have frequented much, some time back, are the LC forum and the UK 9/11 forum. Both are ghost towns.
 
There goes jammonius, typing away. I know you don't believe this stuff, jammonius. You are not fooling anyone.

To put the matter of assessing evidence down to the level of a "belief" is a fundamental error in reasoning. What you post above may, indeed, form the basis of the apparent misunderstanding.

As what happened on 9/11 has not ever been reliably determined by a competent and validly conducted investigation, the issue of "belief" is largely irrelevant in my view.

Do you understand what I have just said?
 
I think we now know just how closely to home the Dick Oliver video and the analysis of it hits.

Farewell, one and all.
 
Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice.

There - somebody had to say it. But did you really want him back?
 
Maybe the twoofers are busy writing a musical.

Building 7,
What's that sound?
Hushaboom,
Not so lo - ud!

It was nano-nano-nano-nano
nanothermite!
The Director of Los Alamos'
favrite dee-lite

Missile stri - kes,
Ho - lograms
And Larry!
Larry!
Larry!

Yes it was Larry
Sil - ver - stein!

Uh, thank you very much.
Ladies and Gentlemen, jammonius has not left the building.

But alienentity has. I'll check back to see if things are still D.O.A. in June. Until then have a pleasant May.

AE
 
One can reasonably infer that the handle "t j" stands for Torquemada Junior because the query it asks is set up so as to create a gotcha scenario. Torquemada Junior asks:

Do any truthers here have a plausible hypothesis for what they think happened on 9/11?

So, right at the outset, the endeavor is simply one of control. Torquemada asks the question, then gets to have a field day based on ridicule and a readily available "amen corner."

In saying, as you do, "10 days, 995 views and yet not a single Truther posting", you act surprised. No person who is interested in reasoned discourse would willingly go along with inquisitional tactics. tj15 has not demonstrated the least interest in having a reason-based discussion and is merely playing a stupid game based on the way the thread was set up.

What?

I'm simply wondering what you think really happened on 9/11. I'm not even going to ask you to prove any parts of your hypothesis.
 
Maybe the twoofers are busy writing a musical.

Building 7,
What's that sound?
Hushaboom,
Not so lo - ud!

It was nano-nano-nano-nano
nanothermite!
The Director of Los Alamos'
favrite dee-lite

Missile stri - kes,
Ho - lograms
And Larry!
Larry!
Larry!

Yes it was Larry
Sil - ver - stein!

Uh, thank you very much.
Ladies and Gentlemen, jammonius has not left the building.

But alienentity has. I'll check back to see if things are still D.O.A. in June. Until then have a pleasant May.

AE

Did someone say 9/11 musical?
 
I could hardly believe it
When I heard the news today
I had to come and get it straight from you

They said you were leavin'
Someone's swept your thread away
From the look upon your face, I see it's true

So tell me all about it
Tell me 'bout the plans you're makin'
Tell me one thing more before I go

Tell me how am I suppose to laugh without you?
Now that I've been laughin at you so long
How am I suppose to laugh without you?
And how am I suppose to carry on?
When all that I've been laughin at is gone

:cry1
 
Last edited:
I think we now know just how closely to home the Dick Oliver video and the analysis of it hits.

Farewell, one and all.

Yes...we know just how closely it hits to home...assuming your home is somewhere on the mothership orbiting Pluto. :)

It's easy to run away...don't let the door hit you in the ass.
 
I think we now know just how closely to home the Dick Oliver video and the analysis of it hits.

Farewell, one and all.

You keep saying farewell, but you don't go anywhere. We know you don't believe engines are hubcaps, jammonius. You have failed to convince anyone here of anything other than that you like to hear yourself talk.

:blush:
 
As what happened on 9/11 has not ever been reliably determined by a competent and validly conducted investigation, the issue of "belief" is largely irrelevant in my view.


Oh dear, I wonder what Dr Judy would think of you describing her "determinations" as unreliable, incompetent and invalid?


Compus
 
What?

I'm simply wondering what you think really happened on 9/11. I'm not even going to ask you to prove any parts of your hypothesis.

OK, fair enough. I take you at your word that you were "simply wondering what [we] think really happened on 9/11" and that you weren't "even going to ask [us] to prove any parts of [our] hypotheses."

Small wonder, then, that you've gotten no replies. You're not proposing a very useful thread.

What happened on 9/11 has not ever been reliably proven by a duly authorized entity in the form of a validly determined investigation. Hence, small talk about it amongst speculators isn't really a worthwhile endeavor. We can all speculate in message boards, but 9/11 chat is not new. We know in advance what's likely to happen.

If the message board is one where most posters support the common storyline, then those who oppose it will be marginalized. If they oppose it effectively, then their posts will be hidden. If their posts are garden variety, then they'll be seized upon by debunkers as proof that debunkers are all knowing and all seeing.
 
Oh dear, I wonder what Dr Judy would think of you describing her "determinations" as unreliable, incompetent and invalid?


Compus

Oh dear is right. You deliberately misconstrued my post. Competent was meant in the sense of that word that means duly authorized and funded. Dr. Wood has determined what destroyed the WTC and has proven it. However, her efforts were those of a dedicated citizen-scientist undertaken in order to expose the falsity of common storyline and the fraud of those who were authorized by Congress and paid with taxpayer funds to determine what destroyed the WTC and who, instead, committed fraud.
 
Every minute of every day some 12 year old goes online unsupervised for the first time, and stumbles across The TruthTM.

And how, pray tell, do you describe what our 12 year olds are subjected to when they go on teevee unsupervised for the umpteenth time and stumble across Fox NewsTM? :(
 

Back
Top Bottom