Yes. Because she has confused a gedankenexperiment that Heisenberg used to describe the uncertainty principle with the truth. In fact, the reason that quantum parameters that are uncertain because they are conjugate with measured quantities is not because the measurements are disturbed- it is because the quantities themselves are of indeterminate value. It's not that they have a value but we can't measure it, it's that they don't have a value. Or in the case of continuous conjugate parameters like position and momentum, they don't have a precise value. It's a little easier to understand with spin, which has discrete values- or perhaps it's more confusing, since this type of thing is completely unlike what we experience.
No. She said that the process of measurement necessarily disturbs it- that's not the point. The point is that measurement makes the conjugate parameter indeterminate, not merely unmeasurable. We can actually tell the difference, there is an experiment called the "Aspect experiment," a realization of an earlier gedankenexperiment devised by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, and called the "EPR experiment" in their honor, that allows us to do so.
