Jalok
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Messages
- 339
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101021/ap_on_re_us/us_christian_flag_defenders
A war memorial in King, North Carolina has had it's Christian flag removed in response to a local complaint as well as a letter from the ACLU. This has resulted in a large pushback from the town and local veterans groups; Christian flags being flown everywhere, a 24 hour vigil at the memorial with a flag, and much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the townhall meeting.
The city council is consulting with it's lawyers for it's options; fight, keep the flag off and deal with the outcry, sell the land the memorial is on to a veteran's group.
From what I've read it seems that the first option is a dead one given previous court decisions regarding seperation of church and state. The second option, the current circumstances, is not politically viable for those in the current council given the vocal outcry which may push them to the other options even if, in the case of the first, it's a losing battle.
The last option is where I have a question. Selling the land and monument to a private party in order to remove the church/state link. I seem to recall a similar situation coming up before and it being shown to be an illegal sale because it's purpose was to circumvent the law, or perhaps a court decision had been involved to make things different.
Assuming you read all that, and got through the last sentence without going " huh?!", what say you? I think the previous situation had to do with that huge cross out in Nevada?, but don't have the time at the moment to look it up.
Jalok
First new thread, please be gentle
A war memorial in King, North Carolina has had it's Christian flag removed in response to a local complaint as well as a letter from the ACLU. This has resulted in a large pushback from the town and local veterans groups; Christian flags being flown everywhere, a 24 hour vigil at the memorial with a flag, and much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the townhall meeting.
The city council is consulting with it's lawyers for it's options; fight, keep the flag off and deal with the outcry, sell the land the memorial is on to a veteran's group.
From what I've read it seems that the first option is a dead one given previous court decisions regarding seperation of church and state. The second option, the current circumstances, is not politically viable for those in the current council given the vocal outcry which may push them to the other options even if, in the case of the first, it's a losing battle.
The last option is where I have a question. Selling the land and monument to a private party in order to remove the church/state link. I seem to recall a similar situation coming up before and it being shown to be an illegal sale because it's purpose was to circumvent the law, or perhaps a court decision had been involved to make things different.
Assuming you read all that, and got through the last sentence without going " huh?!", what say you? I think the previous situation had to do with that huge cross out in Nevada?, but don't have the time at the moment to look it up.
Jalok
First new thread, please be gentle
