• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Marijuana

What should the legal status of marijuana be?

  • Marijuana should be legalised

    Votes: 54 78.3%
  • Marijuana should be decriminalised

    Votes: 10 14.5%
  • Possesion should be legalised/decriminalised for personal use only

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • Marijuana should be legalised for limited medical use, but otherwise remain illegal

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Marijuana should be illegal

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • All marijuana should be shipped to Planet X as tribute to our reptilian overlords

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    69
That depends on what you mean, but if we assume you mean for personal consumption, yes.

http://www.boldweb.com/greenweb/tobacco.htm

Yes I did mean for personal use, thanks.

I do like the way in that link they try and indicate that their tobacco grown from seeds is somehow the “healthy” choice, because its free of artificial additives.
Yeah, because natural carcinogens are always to be preferred ;)

I find that highly amusing, I’m not sure if I can explain why. ;)
 
Yes I did mean for personal use, thanks.

I do like the way in that link they try and indicate that their tobacco grown from seeds is somehow the “healthy” choice, because its free of artificial additives.
Yeah, because natural carcinogens are always to be preferred ;)

I find that highly amusing, I’m not sure if I can explain why. ;)

Everyone knows that natural is always better.

It's probably organic, too.
 
I don't see how I can give much of an answer if I'm supposed to leave out the reasons behind my opinion, and simply present the opinion alone.

So. Legal.

But this pisses me off. Why, I can't say.

What pissed me off most about this article is:

Volkow's institute has been studying the effects of cannabis, whose active ingredients are very similar to important brain chemicals called endogenous cannabinoids.

"It clearly is addictive," she said.


It's NOT clearly addictive and that argument has always been made about marijuana no matter what the strength. It's also NOT a pathway to other drugs; that has ALSO been an argument against legalizing pot.

And what is the problem in using botany and modern science to improve an organic product? It's still just a plant, and making a friggin plant illegal makes about as much sense as making a star or a rock illegal!
 
It's NOT clearly addictive and that argument has always been made about marijuana no matter what the strength.
Define "addictive"? It quite clearly is habbit forming, but then are many other legal substanecs.
 
Define "addictive"? It quite clearly is habbit forming, but then are many other legal substanecs.

Yes, but it doesn't cause physical withdrawal symptoms like cigarettes or heroin. Hell, chocolate is habit forming, but it's not regulated by the government OR smuggled for great profits.
 
I think that it's absurd that marijuana is illegal in the USA (or anywhere).

I highly suspect that much more harm is done to this country's citizens by alcohol and tobacco, yet they're legal. We waste too much money policing something that is no more harmful than these legal drugs.

In discussions about marijuana, I often come back to this memory from high school when I attended a rock concert. I'm pretty sure that it was R.E.M (not a fan, but my friends were - doesn't matter). You could pretty much split the lawn seats down the middle. One half was getting drunk while one half was getting stoned. As the concert went on, the drunk folks started to fight, threw things, created all sorts of mayhem. The other side was so peaceful and just sat there enjoying the music.

It was a very powerful moment. My friends and I had such a great view of this phenomenon as it progressed. The implications were lost on no one. I remember the discussions as we all wondered why the hell was alcohol the legal one.

There is no sensible explanation for making marijuana illegal, in my opinion.

Of course there it, it will undercut nylon rope, they will make paper from it, and what are you going to charge mexicans with as a crime? Simply being mexican doesn't work.
 
That´s what I already told the O.P. in the thread that darat mentioned in post 6.
Would it make sense to merge them?

No. I want to be special.

In any case, this poll has more options than simply yes/no, which I think makes more sense given that there are several different ways of making marijuana legal to different degrees or in different situations, and that's just the ways that have been proposed as serious laws and not just speculation.

Edit : At least, it would make more sense if everyone wasn't just voting "yes" anyway.;)
 
I think that it's absurd that marijuana is illegal in the USA (or anywhere).

I highly suspect that much more harm is done to this country's citizens by alcohol and tobacco, yet they're legal. We waste too much money policing something that is no more harmful than these legal drugs.

In discussions about marijuana, I often come back to this memory from high school when I attended a rock concert. I'm pretty sure that it was R.E.M (not a fan, but my friends were - doesn't matter). You could pretty much split the lawn seats down the middle. One half was getting drunk while one half was getting stoned. As the concert went on, the drunk folks started to fight, threw things, created all sorts of mayhem. The other side was so peaceful and just sat there enjoying the music.

It was a very powerful moment. My friends and I had such a great view of this phenomenon as it progressed. The implications were lost on no one. I remember the discussions as we all wondered why the hell was alcohol the legal one.

There is no sensible explanation for making marijuana illegal, in my opinion.

There is a flaw in the ointment here somewhere. I am trying to find it. Oh, THERE it is......

Just because one bad thing is legal shoud not mean that something that is LESS bad then should be legal.

Too bad the halucinogenic gods that implemented mind-altering substances did not think to either criminalize both or legalize both at the same time. But they didn't. Now we are stuck in this quandry, eh?

We can't hardly play Indian giver at this stage and criminalize liquor. So...does that now mean that in the game of fair is fair...that we also include marijuana?

No.

Do you want to be not only dodging drunk drivers but dodging stupified drivers also????? And drivers who one driving hand down in the potato chip bag constantly?

Edit: I thought I abandoned this post. Oh well. I reconsidered. I got thinking about the policing, courts, etc. My big issue would be with under the influence drivers or adolesents still in school. We can not allow either of these two groups to partake.
 
Last edited:
There is no sensible explanation for making marijuana illegal, in my opinion.

I agree, but I also think that the legalization of marijuana in the U.S. will NEVER happen in the foreseeable future. And the question begs...why?

If the majority of Americans feel it should be legalized why don't politicians take up the issue?
 
I think legalisation is pretty much accepted here in Australia, it's just going to take some time for this to happen. At the moment, several states (South Australia and Western Australia) have decriminalised the possession of small amounts of marijuana (up to 30g or so), and the other states apply "police discretion" which, according to a cop friend of mine, means that the police let you go unless you have a huge amount of the stuff.

Check here:
http://www.drugpolicy.org/global/drugpolicyby/australianew/

Cheers,
TGHO
 
I agree, but I also think that the legalization of marijuana in the U.S. will NEVER happen in the foreseeable future. And the question begs...why?

If the majority of Americans feel it should be legalized why don't politicians take up the issue?

If the majority of Americans think we should have nativity scenes in public grounds, then why can't we?..if your logic prevails?
 
If the majority of Americans think we should have nativity scenes in public grounds, then why can't we?..if your logic prevails?

False analogy. There is nothing in the constitution regulating marijuana but there is something in the constitution regulated the government's involvment with religion.
 
I say decriminalize for adults.

I see it as a matter of jurisdiction, and the fundamental relationship between citizen and government in a free democratic society.

If I want to quit my job, sit at home, eat nothing but Sugar Pops and Pringles, and carve the alphabet on my thorax with a rusty pen knife, it's none of the government's concern.

No one would argue that I should be thrown in jail for that because it damages my health, or I might encourage minors to do it, or I might drive while bleary from pain and malnutrition and blood loss, or I'm not being productive enough, or I might contribute to high health care costs (the kind of arguments that are regularly trotted out regarding marijuana).

Ditto if I want to grow a plant and smoke it, whether it be marijuana, tobacco, or poison ivy.

I have yet to hear a single justification for throwing adults in jail for smoking pot that holds any water.
 
There is a flaw in the ointment here somewhere. I am trying to find it. Oh, THERE it is......

Just because one bad thing is legal shoud not mean that something that is LESS bad then should be legal.

Too bad the halucinogenic gods that implemented mind-altering substances did not think to either criminalize both or legalize both at the same time. But they didn't. Now we are stuck in this quandry, eh?

We can't hardly play Indian giver at this stage and criminalize liquor. So...does that now mean that in the game of fair is fair...that we also include marijuana?

No.

Do you want to be not only dodging drunk drivers but dodging stupified drivers also????? And drivers who one driving hand down in the potato chip bag constantly?

Edit: I thought I abandoned this post. Oh well. I reconsidered. I got thinking about the policing, courts, etc. My big issue would be with under the influence drivers or adolesents still in school. We can not allow either of these two groups to partake.


Actually, that's now what I was trying so say. I don't think that any of them should be illegal, but our government seems to feel that marijuana is more harmful and has outlawed its use while allowing alcohol and tobacco. It is this distinction that I do not understand.

As for driving while under the influence of anything, of course, I don't support that. Just because some is legal doesn't give anyone permission to use/consume it in a way that puts others in danger. That's why drinking alcohol is legal while driving drunk is not.
 
As for driving while under the influence of anything, of course, I don't support that. Just because some is legal doesn't give anyone permission to use/consume it in a way that puts others in danger. That's why drinking alcohol is legal while driving drunk is not.

. . . speaking of ER physicians . . . I listened in on a conversation between two police officers in the 70s (I was working in the local hospital ER at the time) and the elder officer was stating that he'd rather be on the street with 100 "potheads" than a single drunk. The young recruit was asserting that since marijuana was illegal and alcohol wasn't there HAD to be a reason and the reason was that it was likely more dangerous to the public.

The older officer said that marijuana users (in his experience) drove more carefully (perhaps BECAUSE it was illegal) and were less likely to take chances behind the wheel, whereas someone who was drunk was "sure" they could take that turn at 50 MPH, or beat that red light. Coincidentaly, they were there (in the ER) because of a motor vehicle accident involving a drunk driver.
 
Decriminalizing marijuana is a great first step in eventually ending the ravenous war on drugs. For legalization/decriminalization purposes, marijuana is a gateway drug.
 
Last edited:
. . . speaking of ER physicians . . . I listened in on a conversation between two police officers in the 70s (I was working in the local hospital ER at the time) and the elder officer was stating that he'd rather be on the street with 100 "potheads" than a single drunk. The young recruit was asserting that since marijuana was illegal and alcohol wasn't there HAD to be a reason and the reason was that it was likely more dangerous to the public.


Where therein lies the rub - that's what I think that the propaganda machine would like everyone to think. Why that is is beyond me.


ThinBlueLine said:
Decriminalizing marijuana is a great first step in eventually ending the ravenous war on drugs. For legalization/decriminalization purposes, Marijuana is a Gateway drug.

:D

Could be, TBL.
 

Back
Top Bottom