jimtron
Illuminator
This thread won't stay on topic, so I started this one.
If you ask me, a "real desktop" is one where all the parts are user upgradable.
... iMacs aren't a bad value. I would never buy one because I would rather have the choice and flexibility of a PC.
Macs can pretty much do anything PCs can do, and vice versa. This was not always true in the past, but it is today. Whether you use one or the other is largely up to individual preference.
I don't mean from a directory... I mean, I have a picture open on my desktop. I can take that picture window, file open, application and everything, and drag the window to an open email being composed. When I do that, the file is automatically attached to the email.Heh. Well, if the stated topic is the religious war of Mac vs. PC, I'll point out here that SkeptiChick's statement that on a Mac you can drag and drop files to attach them to emails surprised me, since you can do that on a PC too. And always have been able to. Win-M or Win-D hides all active windows, Alt-Tab scrolls through active windows, and although I don't use the function, Vista has widgets too.
See... While a windows machine might be able to do what a Mac can, and a mac can do what a windows machine can, that's not really the issue. Although, there are some differences when it comes to OS.For the record, I use a PC, but I don't hate Macs. I happen to use a PC because it's what I have used most, but the first computer I used regularly was a Mac. I'd happily use one again if I had a reason to.
Macs can pretty much do anything PCs can do, and vice versa. This was not always true in the past, but it is today. Whether you use one or the other is largely up to individual preference.
I just think that Macs are overpriced. Especially the Mac Pro, which is the only one that can really be upgraded. There is just no reason for that computer to cost $2500.
For some people it's worth extra money to have a beautifully designed computer on their desk. Like I said, it's a personal preference. And I think there are legit reasons it costs $2500.But then again, it wouldn't have the pretty case.![]()
Yes, my printer works equally well on a mac as it does on a windows machine. However, on a mac, it took 30 seconds to install (literally). On a windows machine, 4 hours. Yes, you read that right. 4 HOURS.
My digital camera works great on both platforms. On the mac? No install process required at all. Just plug it in, boom photos. On windows? 30 minutes of installing software and drivers before photos.
Setting up a new network connection on mac? 30 seconds. On windows? Who the heck knows how long, but I've seen struggles ranging anywhere from 10 minutes to giving up after no result in 3 hours -- the exact same network that a mac could connect to with no problem, and there were not any hardware issues, it was just the software.
The argument "you could build a computer for less" will never fly with me (whether or not it's actually true) because the cost of the computer isn't just how long it takes to build. It's how much time it sucks out of your life over the course of it's own.
Over the course of my life, I've used most of the major (and some of the not so major) operating systems out there. DOS, Unix, Linux (in various forms), Mac (when it wasn't unix), Windows... The list goes on. Hell, I grew up using DEC Alpha stations in my dad's lab, and unix terminals at home to dial into a university server on a 28.8 connection. I'm no stranger to computers or how they work. I've built them, repaired them, upgraded them, formatted them and reformatted them. And hands down, modern Mac is the absolute least amount of work.
PC (and yeah, linux too sometimes) is great if you're happy wasting your time dealing with inane issues that keep coming up over and over and over again no matter how many times they get "fixed". Personally, I don't particularly enjoy wasting my time. So I use a computer that "just works". That's my personal preference -- to not waste my time and effort on frustrations that simply should not exist. I am willing to pay more in the short run so I end up paying less in the long run. So I do. And I'm 100% satisfied.
Have you actually looked at the design of the case? It's not just about looks. It's functional. Custom air flow design, specialized heat zones, ease of access to components, custom connections that eliminate the need to dig through layers of ribbon cable...I just think that Macs are overpriced. Especially the Mac Pro, which is the only one that can really be upgraded. There is just no reason for that computer to cost $2500. For that money I could build (or just buy) a computer that is much, much better. But then again, it wouldn't have the pretty case.![]()
For some people it's worth extra money to have a beautifully designed computer on their desk. Like I said, it's a personal preference.
And I think there are legit reasons it costs $2500.
I would encourage you to do some heavy research into exact price comparisons for equal machines instead of just noticing that you can get a bargain basement tower system from dell for $399, whereas mac's cheapest machine is $700. Yes, if all you look at is the lowest price available, mac seems more expensive. If you actually look at what you're getting hardware spec wise for that money? Not so much.I own a very nice mac book that I've had for about a year now. I mostly work with PCs but also Solaris, SuSe, etc.
My biggest complaint about the Macs are their price. Everything, and I mean everything, is overpriced compared to a PC. As far as desktops are concerned, its great to be able to upgrade your sound card, your video card, etc. and do it on the cheap. Mac...not so much.
<snip>
Macs are great, but they are way over priced.
$1000+ extra?
Yes, I can do that on a PC too. Always have been able to. ETA: Unless you talk about going back fifteen years to the DOS age. I couldn't do it then.I don't mean from a directory... I mean, I have a picture open on my desktop. I can take that picture window, file open, application and everything, and drag the window to an open email being composed. When I do that, the file is automatically attached to the email.
I took 30 seconds to install my printer on my Vista laptop....
Yes, my printer works equally well on a mac as it does on a windows machine. However, on a mac, it took 30 seconds to install (literally). On a windows machine, 4 hours. Yes, you read that right. 4 HOURS.
Again, less than 30 seconds to read files from my digital camera.My digital camera works great on both platforms. On the mac? No install process required at all. Just plug it in, boom photos. On windows? 30 minutes of installing software and drivers before photos.
My Vista laptop saw my home wireless network and its internet connection first time, no problem. I didn't even actually install anything - it worked without intervention, first time. I booted the machine and it was simply there. I take it somewhere else, and if there's a wireless connection available, I tell it to connect and it connects in less than thirty seconds.Setting up a new network connection on mac? 30 seconds. On windows? Who the heck knows how long, but I've seen struggles ranging anywhere from 10 minutes to giving up after no result in 3 hours -- the exact same network that a mac could connect to with no problem, and there were not any hardware issues, it was just the software.
And that's great that it works for you. My experience is that PCs "just work", and I never seem to need to spend the time over them that you obviously have. Oh, there is the occasional problem, but it is invariably self-inflicted, since I like to muck about with things, and I suspect I'd have those problems on Mac or Linux as well. For example, while I was in the US, I managed to turn off my laptop's external speakers. I haven't yet worked out how I did it, or how to fix it. Point being, this is something that I did, and not something to do with the fact that I'm running Windows....
PC (and yeah, linux too sometimes) is great if you're happy wasting your time dealing with inane issues that keep coming up over and over and over again no matter how many times they get "fixed". Personally, I don't particularly enjoy wasting my time. So I use a computer that "just works". That's my personal preference -- to not waste my time and effort on frustrations that simply should not exist. I am willing to pay more in the short run so I end up paying less in the long run. So I do. And I'm 100% satisfied.
Not really.