• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Libby found guilty

Again, if they didn't know where AA77 was and had no way of shooting it down, how could Cheney have been talking about AA77?
Click to expand...


[CT]But, but, but the Pentagon had missiles[/CT]

The poster accepts no responibility for any braincells killed while reading the above link.
 
busherie said:
Richard Clarke, saying that Cheney left his office for the PEOC just after 0900 and not minutes before F77 crashed (0936).
Click to expand...

You need to read Against All Enemies again. Clarke leaves Cheney in his office, "gathering papers" to go downstairs. He does not say that Cheney leaves for the PEOC just after 0900.
 
[=MaGZ;2404836]There was a conspiracy to get the US into a war against Iraq using fake intel: example the Niger "yellowcake" report.
Click to expand...

You are, as you know, not telling the truth. The forged documents played no role whatever in the decision to invade Iraq. The Washington Post is strongly anti-Bush. You might want to read its editorial of March 7, particularly the references to Lyin' Joe Wilson.
 
Last edited:
[=busherie;2405146]Indeed that's a good question. The answer is I don't know, and nobody does. The WH defense system is not known.

Anyway, I'll stop bringing up Mineta here, because there is an ultimate clash about him: you choose to believe Cheney & co, I choose to believe Mineta, Bohrer, Clarke etc...

Busherie
Click to expand...


Regarding Mineta's incorrect timeline, there is nothing to believe. That is, unless you think Mineta accurately reported Dick Cheney announcing in public that orders existed permitting a hijacked plane to crash into a government building. Most of us get the idea that the orders in question were the shoot-down orders Bush had communicated to Cheney. If Cheney had really insisted that a hijacked plane (hey, I thought it wasn't a plane) was going to be allowed to fly into the Pentagon or the Capitol, some people might regard it as newsworthy.
 
pomeroo said:
You are, as you know, not telling the truth. The forged documents played no role whatever in the decision to invade Iraq. The Washington Post is strongly anti-Bush. You might want to read its editorial of March 7, particularly the references to Lyin' Joe Wilson.
Click to expand...

Bush referenced the Niger documents saying the British gave them credence in his State of the Union speech.
 
pomeroo said:
You are, as you know, not telling the truth. The forged documents played no role whatever in the decision to invade Iraq. The Washington Post is strongly anti-Bush. You might want to read its editorial of March 7, particularly the references to Lyin' Joe Wilson.
Click to expand...

Pomeroo, you should take this to Politics, because that's what this post of yours is all about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom