headscratcher4
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2002
- Messages
- 7,776
Well, if someone starts polluting gramma or speeling, isn't that hijacking the language class?I thought it was funny until you get to the end. Taking 10 seconds to say "God may have created Earth" is hardly hijacking science class, especially chemistry which is what is shown on the chalkboard.
I thought it was funny until you get to the end. Taking 10 seconds to say "God may have created Earth" is hardly hijacking science class, especially chemistry which is what is shown on the chalkboard.
Again, briefly acknowledging an alternate belief or not making evolution a mandatory part of the curriculum is not changing science and replacing it with magic. Its on such a small scale it would be, using your analogy, one grammar error on a paper being overlooked.Well, if someone starts polluting gramma or speeling, isn't that hijacking the language class?
Okay then, lets have Kansas not just teach creationism, but make it a whole seperate class and make it a full semmester and mandatory that every student takes it. Now everyone's happy.Considering it has no place being in a science class I would have to disagree as to its non-hijacking-ness.
No it won't. I may be pesimistic, but i believe that as soon as the foot is in the door, the door won't be closed for many a year. First one little finger, then the whole hand, then the arm, and then the body.Again, briefly acknowledging an alternate belief or not making evolution a mandatory part of the curriculum is not changing science and replacing it with magic. Its on such a small scale it would be, using your analogy, one grammar error on a paper being overlooked.
Rather, use a month on a bunch of creation myths, and show why they aren't usable within the context of science. That i could support.Okay then, lets have Kansas not just teach creationism, but make it a whole seperate class and make it a full semmester and mandatory that every student takes it. Now everyone's happy.
As you can see your argument is flawed. I dont know about you but i would rather my kids listen to 5 minutes of ******** than 5 months
You cant get a month out of it. 1 day at most. Contrary to what you hear on the Daily Show, most christians dont believe man lived with dinosaurs, and few have even heard that the bible says the world is 6000 years old. You are grossly misinformed.Rather, use a month on a bunch of creation myths, and show why they aren't usable within the context of science. That i could support.
Each class a different theory. Like, aztec, christian, buddhist, etc.You cant get a month out of it. 1 day at most. Contrary to what you hear on the Daily Show, most christians dont believe man lived with dinosaurs, and few have even heard that the bible says the world is 6000 years old. You are grossly misinformed.
Throughout all of high school, going through AP Bio (so I have about 2.5 years), evolution hasnt been brought up once. by completely removing it from the curriculum, there is no way it will turn into a slippery slope.
How do you make it through 2.5 years of biology without covering genetics? Who runs an AP Biology course without covering genetics (a major component of the AP Biology test)?Throughout all of high school, going through AP Bio (so I have about 2.5 years), evolution hasnt been brought up once.
I willl admit it is possible, but America is a nation of Christians. The country stops on Christmas and Easter. Not to mention most Americans could not tell you the differences between the Mayans and the Aztecs. I really cant see much protesting being done for Mayan equality in schoolsEach class a different theory. Like, aztec, christian, buddhist, etc.![]()
How do you make it through 2.5 years of biology without covering genetics? Who runs an AP Biology course without covering genetics (a major component of the AP Biology test)?
I thought it was funny until you get to the end. Taking 10 seconds to say "God may have created Earth" is hardly hijacking science class, especially chemistry which is what is shown on the chalkboard.
That explains a lot.but as for covering the theories of evolution, I havent come close to anything like that since 6th grade.
If youre still learning evolution in high school you are quite a few years behind son.That explains a lot.
So you are saying that to make little minded (and that is being generous) people feel good, teachers should lie to their students. Not a great or noble idea.
I'm well out of grad school and I'm still learning evolution. I would recommend the same practice to anyone.If youre still learning evolution in high school you are quite a few years behind son.
I'm well out of grad school and I'm still learning evolution. I would recommend the same practice to anyone.
Excellent idea.Okay then, lets have Kansas not just teach creationism,
Only if it is taught as modern mythology, or as a sociology/civilization course; otherwise it is in violation of the establishment clause.but make it a whole seperate class
So long as it fits my previous criteria, sure, why not?and make it a full semmester and mandatory that every student takes it.
Now everyone's happy.
As you can see your argument is flawed. I dont know about you but i would rather my kids listen to 5 minutes of ******** than 5 months
In that case, you contradicted yourself. Forcing one religion to learn something is against the establishment cause. You should stick with short, ambiguous postings as not to do this.Excellent idea.
No, you attempted counter-argument is flawed because it is a false dichotomy. It is not a matter of 5-minutes in the science class, or a whole semester as its own class. My comment was focused directly at the idea of creationism in a science class. No more, no less. To attempt to take it beyond such and then argue against it is a strawman.