• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JREF Exclusive: Mark Cuban update

MarkyX

Master Poster
MarkyX
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
2,157
Since the announcement of Mark Cuban's endorsement of the fictional movie, Loose Change, a lot of people from both sides pondered on Cuban's motivation in all of this. The local media to everyone's least favorite loud mouth Bill Reilly, questioned as to why someone would promote a video they didn't believe in. Cuban's reasons are freedom of speech and expression, even if it's false. He even claimed to welcome a rebuttal. The response from many debunkers, including myself, called BS.

Good news, a representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. In other words, opposing forces at work. Obviously one cannot sell a movie with subtitles over original footage as a "debate", but I wouldn't have been contacted by Mark Cuban if he wasn't interested in hearing the what "other side" has to say.

I can't give much details, mainly because nothing has really developed yet, but I just want to inform you all that Mark Cuban is well-aware of Screw Loose Change's existence.
 
Last edited:
This seems consistent with his statements that he is just looking to publish all angles of a controversial subject and has no personal vested interested (other than profit).
 
I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.
 
Get a bunch of professionals, interview them and refute the claims that way I'm guessing. Kind of like FahrenHYPE 9/11 or the BBC documentary on 9/11 CT's.
 
i always figured cuban was just interested in capitalizing on what he sees as a viable market (im honestly suprised no one did before)

by offering to distribute a rebuttal film as well he will be making money off both sides of the argument, a rather brilliant move, from a financial point of view, with a bit of delicious irony in that the savior who was to bring 9/11 truth to the mainstream may very well bring debunking there as well, lol
 
Yep, and the conversation with the gentleman was pretty entertaining. I've managed to plug in a few things, including Gravy's Loose Change guide and the JREF forums to the representative.

All we have to do is wait.
 
Actually, at the end of the day they still get their money. So I guess it won't be that big of a deal for Dylan, but a lot of the truthers sure will be pissed.
 
MarkyX said:
Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true.
Click to expand...
Okay, thanks for removing the "I lied" part. I don't have enough hair on my head to afford scratching like that. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom