JREF 9/11 Links - twitter feed

[jhunter1163]

R. Mackey puts the beam-weapon theory to bed once and for all:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2086102#post2086102

 

[Baylor]

R. Mackey puts the beam-weapon theory to bed once and for all:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2086102#post2086102

Thanks jhunter, will add shortly.

 

[Edx]

If I may offer a criticism: something needs to be done about that background.

Yea makes me feel motion sick for some reason

 

[rjh01]

Bump to mention this thread http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=183072

 

[triforcharity]

Hey Rjh, thanks!

 

[ElMondoHummus]

After reading some discussion on the topic, I made my own JREF-only link site debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories.

If you know of any specific posts that thoroughly debunk a 9/11 CT, please find it and link to it. The post should be:

1. to the point.
2. a single post and not a long discussion of JREFers trying to teach a hapless truther.
3. it should debunk a 9/11 CT commonly accepted in trutherville.

Here's what I got so far: http://twitter.com/JREF911links

Well, since thermite is the topic that just won't die:

• Sunstealer's refutation of Jones's conclusion, using Jones's own photomicrography and spectrographic arguments: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4607894&postcount=1694
• His more detailed argument analyzing points of the X-EDS and SEM photomicrography: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4659658#post4659658

Keep in mind, too, that if you wanted to be lazy, you could just randomly pick a link from Gravy's website. If there's an encyclopedia against the common trutherisms, it's that, Mike's 911myths site, or the Debunking911 one.

 

[T.A.M.]

tfk (tom) has been schooling fmr2 in a thread here recently, I believe on the analysis of WTC7, here

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182833

TAM