John Kerry Regarding WTC7

[Totovader]

Somebody called John Kerry's office:

Finally- now all those Deniers claiming "I believe a US Senator before I believe you!" when dealing with the statements made- will have to concede to that.

 

[Orphia Nay]

Somebody called John Kerry's office:

How did I guess it wouldn't have been a truther who called John Kerry?

Thanks for the link and quote, boloboffin.

That's a pretty good article.

Folks, you are free to believe what you will of 9/11 whether or not the government was behind it. But, what I am asking is that any article that comes across your monitor stating that the government was behind 9/11 is to use critical thinking. Do not automatically believe in your angst against this administration that every article that says President Bush did it is true. To be honest, at one time I believed these theories. It was only through critical thinking and searching out what others of a differing opinion had to say that changed my mind. And no, I am not a collaborator, but a writer who has consistently written negative articles targeted at George W. Bush.

 

[PhantomWolf]

Before the troothers came to be the word "MOVEMENT" meant something very specific to me...and now....

oh...nevermind...it still means the same thing.

I think we should call them the 9/11 Truth Revolution, because all they do is go around in circles.

 

[MaGZ]

Senator John Kerry was questioned about the collapse of WTC Building 7 during an appearance at Book People in Austin, Texas.

Kerry responded:


Here is the video.


I think he's referring to WTC6 to be honest. Doesn't make much sense that he knew WTC7 was a controlled demolition and didn't bring it up in the 04 election. I am guessing someone representing Kerry will have to clear this up within a few days.

Your being silly. No Truther would ever ask a question about WTC 6.

 

[The Doc]

Your being silly. No Truther would ever ask a question about WTC 6.

I'm not saying that they asked the question referring to WTC6 MaGZ. I'm saying that Kerry was most likely referring to WTC6 in his answer by referring to "the wall" that was brought down in a controlled fashion, as that is what happened to WTC6.

 

[MaGZ]

Why would John Kerry know about the conspiracy? And since when to people refer to 47 storey buildings as "that wall." He's most likely just talking about the slurry wall (notice the word "wall" there) as others have said, or possibly the perimeter walls (again, "walls") left standing after the Twin Towers collapsed.

Why would Kerry have any knowledge of a slurry wall being any kind of a threat? It is obvious firefighters were concerned WTC 7 might collapse.
You are grasping at straws in your explanation.

 

[apathoid]

Why would Kerry have any knowledge of a slurry wall being any kind of a threat?

How many times have you heard someone refer to a skyscraper, or any building for that matter, as a wall?

It is obvious firefighters were concerned WTC 7 might collapse.

Please think about that.

You are grasping at straws in your explanation.

"...I called up Senator Kerry’s office and an aid that I spoke with knew of this article being circulated and he flat out told me that Senator Kerry never opined or stated that Building 7 was deliberately demolished. What he said was that “one wall had to be taken down” He never said that the whole building was intentionally brought down by a controlled demolition.."


You were saying??

 

[MaGZ]

I'm not saying that they asked the question referring to WTC6 MaGZ. I'm saying that Kerry was most likely referring to WTC6 in his answer by referring to "the wall" that was brought down in a controlled fashion, as that is what happened to WTC6.

Do you really think Kerry knew which building was WTC 6 or that a team pulled the building over?

And the "pulling" of WTC 6, wasn't that days after 9/11? On the afternoon of 9/11 WTC 6 was still burning so they could not haved pull the building over.

Is the "wall" you are referring to one of the sides of WTC 1 that reminded after the collapse?

Did this "wall" fall on it’s own, and if not what day was it pulled down?

 

[MaGZ]

How many times have you heard someone refer to a skyscraper, or any building for that matter, as a wall?





Please think about that.





"...I called up Senator Kerry’s office and an aid that I spoke with knew of this article being circulated and he flat out told me that Senator Kerry never opined or stated that Building 7 was deliberately demolished. What he said was that “one wall had to be taken down” He never said that the whole building was intentionally brought down by a controlled demolition.."


You were saying??

So your interpretation of the statement is Kerry was saying one wall of WTC 7 had to be taken down?

 

[The Doc]

Do you really think Kerry knew which building was WTC 6 or that a team pulled the building over?

And the "pulling" of WTC 6, wasn't that days after 9/11? On the afternoon of 9/11 WTC 6 was still burning so they could not haved pull the building over.

Is the "wall" you are referring to one of the sides of WTC 1 that reminded after the collapse?

Did this "wall" fall on it’s own, and if not what day was it pulled down?

You are missing my point MaGZ.

I'm saying that Kerry probably answered in reference to WTC6 in his obviously confused/uneducated answer. I doubt he would have known that WTC6 (specifically) was demolished. He probably knew that a few of the buildings had to be brought down in a controlled fashion, and assumed WTC7 was one of them.

 

[nicepants]

Interesting

It's funny, that to a truther, any statement made by any person that is consistent with their theory is "proof".

I.e. "pull it", etc

Statements made to the contrary are meaningless, even when accompanied by physical evidence.

The double standard is astounding.

 

[beachnut]

So your interpretation of the statement is Kerry was saying one wall of WTC 7 had to be taken down?

You must learn to comprehend.

Kerry said he does not know. He does not know. Which part of not knowing do you not understand. Kerry said he does not have knowledge, he talked about thinking he heard something about a wall had to be taken down for safety. He is not talking about WTC7, because he also tells you he does not know.

You must listen better, and comprehend. Your grades will go up. Also you will get a lot smarter if you stop going to the NeoNAZI sites.

 

[VespaGuy]

Here's another truther's take on the Kerry quote at LCF

When they caption him with the Red/White text ribbon, they leave out the words "I think" when he said "...that wall was in danger and I think they made a decision based on..."

I can just see that is something somebody will turn into a strawman later to try and discredit the whole thing. I wouldn't be surprised if that was 'planted' there by somebody to 'discover' later just for that purpose. Looks like I beat them to it.

Yup. The very same video that CTs are claiming shows Kerry admited that WTC7 was a CD, was actually planted for the sole purpose of actually discrediting the Cts. These people actually believe this? The CT claims get nuttier and nuttier with each passing day.