• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

John Kerry Regarding WTC7

The Doc

Curing Stupidity
The Doc
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
2,158
Senator John Kerry was questioned about the collapse of WTC Building 7 during an appearance at Book People in Austin, Texas.

Kerry responded:
I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion.
Click to expand...

Here is the video.


I think he's referring to WTC6 to be honest. Doesn't make much sense that he knew WTC7 was a controlled demolition and didn't bring it up in the 04 election. I am guessing someone representing Kerry will have to clear this up within a few days.
 
For the last time! Larry Silverstein would not admit on live television that he ordered a destruction of a building! Just how idiotic are these people?
 
Well, as part of the ritual infighting that our slow cousins enjoy whenever a thread goes beyond 7 posts, JTGOB over at LCF seems to think it's likely he's talking about this one

11019462c6f2808861.jpg


which seems reasonable enough to me. (link to post)
 
The question asker claims Silverstein made $5 billion off 9/11. How can people who call themselves "truth seekers" lie so blatantly and continue to call themselves that.

Also to note is the fact that Kerry (and he admits this) has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.
 
Yes, it's clear from the context that John Kerry has not been reading his Skull and Bones alumni newsletters hasn't a clue what the questioner is referring to. I'd lay odds that Kerry was accepting the report of controlled demolition from the questioner at face value.
 
My mate LUCUS has gone into CAPS LOCK overdrive.

I guess he's given up any hope of ever becoming an LCF mod now.:D
 
Anyone know what he's referring to by "the wall"?
Click to expand...

I cant watch the video, but may I venture a guess he is talking about something underground. I recall there was fear of flooding etc because the skirting dam had been breached
 
LUCUS at LCF said:
This is such a big lie, that means there are lies piled on top of lies on top of lies on top of lies

It is hard to keep track. He slipped up and that's the way I am marketing it
Click to expand...

With the use of the word marketing, Lucus gives the game away about the true nature of 9/11 conspiracy theories for many of those involved - a product to be marketed. Nice slip up, Lucus!
 
sleahead said:
With the use of the word marketing, Lucus gives the game away about the true nature of 9/11 conspiracy theories for many of those involved - a product to be marketed. Nice slip up, Lucus!
Click to expand...

Aha, Yes. It seems to me that the true conspiracy behind 9/11 today is a conspiracy by Fletzer and others to make lots of money.




(Fellow Brits will note the "In my opinion", "Have I Got News for You" caveat there. :) )
 
Architect said:
Aha, Yes. It seems to me that the true conspiracy behind 9/11 today is a conspiracy by Fletzer and others to make lots of money.




(Fellow Brits will note the "In my opinion", "Have I Got News for You" caveat there. :) )
Click to expand...
Allegedly
 
Undesired Walrus said:
Allegedly
Click to expand...



Ach soddit.

In my professional opinion the NIST report adequately describes the principal reasons behind the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, based upon an acceptably thorough analysis of the surviving evidence. This is in stark contrast to the principal proponents of alternative conspiracy theories, notably the likes of Loose Change, Fetzer, Jones, and Griffin, who - in my informed view - show a startling failure to address the underlying issues in a comprehensive, rounded manner. On this basis I believe them to be either deeply misguided or more interested in personal gain.


Phew. Complaint to the RIBA coming already. I can just feel it.
 
Last edited:
I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion.
Click to expand...

I think he's pulling the twoofers' legs.
 
ref said:
That's Fetzer and Griffin :p Sorry, I just had to do that.
Click to expand...


No, I mean Jimmy Feltzer that drinks down at the Nag's Head and Ray Griffiths, the snooker player. Sheesh, don't u guys know anything????

:p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom