• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Is This Article Overly Optimistic?

Tony

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
15,410
http://www.aarpmagazine.org/people/Articles/a2004-07-20-mag-wakeup.html ...full article

Okay, maybe the Boomer Generation didn’t change the world the way we once thought it would. But as our exclusive survey reveals, this sleeping giant is now rousing itself to rock American politics like never before.

When they first came of age, it appeared certain that baby boomers were destined to change American politics forever. The long-haired teens who took to the streets to fight for civil rights and to protest the Vietnam War also won the right for 18-year-olds to vote starting in 1972. Many political veterans at the time predicted seismic upheavals in the years to follow, as the kids matured into activist adults.

As things turned out, boomers have transformed our culture and our economy, influencing everything from the beverages we drink to the television shows we watch to the medical procedures we undergo, but not so much our politics. Their elders, whom we revere as The Greatest Generation for their grit and heroism during the Great Depression and World War II, have been steadfastly engaged in setting the terms of public discourse and purpose. Meanwhile, materialism, an entrepreneurial bent—and a longstanding distrust of big government—have led the boomers away from mass action.

Until now.


Is the baby-boomer generation really going to change the political landscape as much as this article predicts?
 
Well this is from the AARP, so I imagine they are just pissing their depends hoping boomers won't cut off their gravy train.
 
Tony said:
http://www.aarpmagazine.org/people/Articles/a2004-07-20-mag-wakeup.html ...full article
Is the baby-boomer generation really going to change the political landscape as much as this article predicts?
These sorts of articles tend to be written by baby boomers who have either sat out the revolution and want to validate their existance as death bears down on them like a steam train, or baby boomers who participated in the revolution and want to try to re-live the old days.


(for those who may think I've covered all baby boomers in that statement, there are quite a few boomers who are quite satisfied in themselves and don't need to write attention-whoring articles about what sort of 'force' they're going to be this week)
 
Whoracle said:
Well this is from the AARP, so I imagine they are just pissing their depends hoping boomers won't cut off their gravy train.


Uhhmm Whoracle..before making such comments, you DID know that the youngest of the boomers are at or near the age to be AARP members, didn't you?


How exactly are a bunch of 50 to 70 year olds a 'new' generation , or 'getting ready' to change anything?
 
Yes I do realize boomers are getting close to retirement age, and people in that age group suddenly realize they should start voting for people who are going to give old people more money. But what else could they be talking about. The boomers aren't hippies trying to change the world anymore. They are the establishment now. Getting more money for old people is the basic goal of the AARP, so something must have them worried.
 
The impact of the babyboomers getting old isn't about voting for or against things--it's the massive demographic changes that will occur simply because they exist in such numbers. They're starting to retire, in a time when medical costs, property values, and life expectancy are all rising. They will need a lot more money saved up for retirement than their parents needed, and they will live for longer. Social Security and Medicare are already massive drains on the budget paying just for the war-time generation--just wait until we see millions more old people, requiring more subsidies for the pricier medicine, all living for twenty, thirty years after retirement.

Not to mention the population changes. Retirees tend to relocate. What happens to places that see an influx of people suddenly? Florida is getting to be full, and pricy. Georgia and South Carolina are seeing record numbers of retirees moving there, and the average age of those states is rising. Political priorities will shift from education toward medical care, to name just one inevitable trend.

I think there will be sweeping changes, but as a result of demographic shifts rather than a planned political campaign.
 
TragicMonkey said:
The impact of the babyboomers getting old isn't about voting for or against things--it's the massive demographic changes that will occur simply because they exist in such numbers. They're starting to retire, in a time when medical costs, property values, and life expectancy are all rising. They will need a lot more money saved up for retirement than their parents needed, and they will live for longer. Social Security and Medicare are already massive drains on the budget paying just for the war-time generation--just wait until we see millions more old people, requiring more subsidies for the pricier medicine, all living for twenty, thirty years after retirement.

Not to mention the population changes. Retirees tend to relocate. What happens to places that see an influx of people suddenly? Florida is getting to be full, and pricy. Georgia and South Carolina are seeing record numbers of retirees moving there, and the average age of those states is rising. Political priorities will shift from education toward medical care, to name just one inevitable trend.

I think there will be sweeping changes, but as a result of demographic shifts rather than a planned political campaign.

It is called 'Rebounders'...Florida is suddenly NOT what a lot of retirees thought it was going to be, and after a couple of years they pick up and move to Carolina to be near state of the art medical facilities at Duke...
 
crimresearch said:
It is called 'Rebounders'...Florida is suddenly NOT what a lot of retirees thought it was going to be, and after a couple of years they pick up and move to Carolina to be near state of the art medical facilities at Duke...

There's also the unanticipated effect of military hospital closings. Military retirees like to retire to where they can get their healthcare, which is an increasingly small number of destinations.
 

Back
Top Bottom