Quote by CBL4
Let's assume it is a disease. What changes?
Do you mean ...
"It doesn't matter what you call it, the need to attend to curing the disease or relieving an illness or symptom is unchanged."
I do think it matters what we call it.
Then we know what is the right thing to do.
Partly it is the usage of language causing part of the problem.
Consider what Goodwin said (page 2 and 3) in the debate.
Essentially he said that there is a difference between
"Depression" and "depression"
-
"Depression" with a capital "D" which is a NAME for a medical condition defined by the medical authorities/community.
-
"depression" which is usually taken to mean a "state of being depressed". This state could be symptom of a disease, or it could be a harmless temporary result of tired day.
But I do think it was wrong to have a disease called "Depression".
They could have called it SDD "Seretoni-Deficiency"Disease.
Or they could call it IFS Disease ("I feel sad") .
Or maybe Ameoba Depression Disease. (If Ameoba is a germ that caused brain damage and therefore caused the depressed mood).
Why call it "Depression" and create all the confusion?