Dancing David Penultimate Amazing Joined Mar 26, 2003 Messages 39,700 Location central Illinois Sep 10, 2007 #41 Thank you Jason, is the sukka=balance, dukka=unbalance a correct reading of the pali?
JetLeg Master Poster J Joined Aug 29, 2007 Messages 2,414 Sep 10, 2007 #42 Is philosophy scientific? No, but that does not disqualify philosophy. Buddhism is more a philosophy than a science.
Is philosophy scientific? No, but that does not disqualify philosophy. Buddhism is more a philosophy than a science.
Nosaj Thinker Joined Jun 11, 2007 Messages 172 Sep 10, 2007 #43 David, Dancing David said: Thank you Jason, is the sukka=balance, dukka=unbalance a correct reading of the pali? Click to expand... I guess that is one possible interpretation that could be appropriate in certain circumstances. Jason
David, Dancing David said: Thank you Jason, is the sukka=balance, dukka=unbalance a correct reading of the pali? Click to expand... I guess that is one possible interpretation that could be appropriate in certain circumstances. Jason
Dancing David Penultimate Amazing Joined Mar 26, 2003 Messages 39,700 Location central Illinois Sep 10, 2007 #44 Elohim said: David, I guess that is one possible interpretation that could be appropriate in certain circumstances. Jason Click to expand... Well that is a common interpretation from sanskit cognates, which is why I asked. So not all the time? Cool.
Elohim said: David, I guess that is one possible interpretation that could be appropriate in certain circumstances. Jason Click to expand... Well that is a common interpretation from sanskit cognates, which is why I asked. So not all the time? Cool.